Trustworthy artificial intelligence: A decision-making taxonomy of potential challenges

被引:3
|
作者
Akbar, Muhammad Azeem [1 ]
Khan, Arif Ali [2 ]
Mahmood, Sajjad [3 ]
Rafi, Saima [4 ]
Demi, Selina [5 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Lahti Univ Technol, Software Engn Dept, Lappeenranta 53851, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, M3S Empir Software Engn Res Unit, Oulu, Finland
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Informat & Comp Sci Dept, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ Murcia, Dept Informat & Syst, Murcia, Spain
[5] Ostfold Univ Coll, Fac Comp Sci, Halden, Norway
来源
SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE | 2024年 / 54卷 / 09期
关键词
challenges; multi-vocal literature review; questionnaire; SPI manifesto; trustworthy AI software; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SOFTWARE; MANAGEMENT; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1002/spe.3216
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The significance of artificial intelligence (AI) trustworthiness lies in its potential impacts on society. AI revolutionizes various industries and improves social life, but it also brings ethical harm. However, the challenging factors of AI trustworthiness are still being debated. This research explores the challenging factors and their priorities to be considered in the software process improvement (SPI) manifesto for developing a trustworthy AI system. The multivocal literature review (MLR) and questionnaire-based survey approaches are used to identify the challenging factors from state-of-the-art literature and industry. Prioritization based taxonomy of the challenges is developed, which reveals that lack of responsible and accountable ethical AI leaders, lack of ethics audits, moral deskilling & debility, lack of inclusivity in AI multistakeholder governance, and lack of scale training programs to sensitize the workforce on ethical issues are the top-ranked challenging factors to be considered in SPI manifesto. This study's findings suggest revising AI-based development techniques and strategies, particularly focusing on trustworthiness. In addition, the results of this study encourage further research to support the development and quality assessment of ethics-aware AI systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1621 / 1650
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making
    Bjerring J.C.
    Busch J.
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (2) : 349 - 371
  • [22] Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
    Shrestha, Yash Raj
    Ben-Menahem, Shiko M.
    von Krogh, Georg
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 61 (04) : 66 - 83
  • [23] Substation decision-making platform based on artificial intelligence
    Qin J.
    Zhu X.
    Wang Z.
    Ma J.
    Gao S.
    Hu C.
    [J]. Hu, Chengbo (huchengbo01@163.com), 1600, River Publishers (35): : 151 - 172
  • [24] ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE IN CLINICAL LABORATORY DECISION-MAKING
    PAPPAS, AA
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1985, 31 (06) : 895 - 896
  • [25] Rescue Artificial Intelligence Assistant Decision-Making System
    Zhou, Huaren
    Liu, Changyu
    Zhang, Chun
    Zhang, Yan
    [J]. 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (ICEIM 2011), 2011, : 47 - 49
  • [26] Algorithms and Influence Artificial Intelligence and Crisis Decision-Making
    Horowitz, Michael C.
    Lin-Greenberg, Erik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2022, 66 (04)
  • [27] Interacting Decision-making Agents and their Impacts on Assurances: Taxonomy and Challenges
    Bencomo, Nelly
    Lewis, Peter R.
    Goetz, Sebastian
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL MODEL-DRIVEN REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING WORKSHOP (MODRE 2018), 2018, : 79 - 83
  • [28] Exploring the potential of Artificial intelligence: Revolutionizing treatment decision-making in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Froicu, E-M.
    Afrasanie, V-A.
    Alexa-Stratulat, T.
    Radu, I.
    Miron, L.
    Marinca, M. V.
    Gafton, B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S19 - S19
  • [29] The Medicine Revolution Through Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Challenges of Machine Learning Algorithms in Decision-Making
    Marques, Marta
    Almeida, Ana
    Pereira, Helder
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [30] Artificial intelligence in educational leadership: a symbiotic role of human-artificial intelligence decision-making
    Wang, Yinying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 59 (03) : 256 - 270