Trustworthy artificial intelligence: A decision-making taxonomy of potential challenges

被引:3
|
作者
Akbar, Muhammad Azeem [1 ]
Khan, Arif Ali [2 ]
Mahmood, Sajjad [3 ]
Rafi, Saima [4 ]
Demi, Selina [5 ]
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Lahti Univ Technol, Software Engn Dept, Lappeenranta 53851, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, M3S Empir Software Engn Res Unit, Oulu, Finland
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Informat & Comp Sci Dept, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ Murcia, Dept Informat & Syst, Murcia, Spain
[5] Ostfold Univ Coll, Fac Comp Sci, Halden, Norway
来源
SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE | 2024年 / 54卷 / 09期
关键词
challenges; multi-vocal literature review; questionnaire; SPI manifesto; trustworthy AI software; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SOFTWARE; MANAGEMENT; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1002/spe.3216
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The significance of artificial intelligence (AI) trustworthiness lies in its potential impacts on society. AI revolutionizes various industries and improves social life, but it also brings ethical harm. However, the challenging factors of AI trustworthiness are still being debated. This research explores the challenging factors and their priorities to be considered in the software process improvement (SPI) manifesto for developing a trustworthy AI system. The multivocal literature review (MLR) and questionnaire-based survey approaches are used to identify the challenging factors from state-of-the-art literature and industry. Prioritization based taxonomy of the challenges is developed, which reveals that lack of responsible and accountable ethical AI leaders, lack of ethics audits, moral deskilling & debility, lack of inclusivity in AI multistakeholder governance, and lack of scale training programs to sensitize the workforce on ethical issues are the top-ranked challenging factors to be considered in SPI manifesto. This study's findings suggest revising AI-based development techniques and strategies, particularly focusing on trustworthiness. In addition, the results of this study encourage further research to support the development and quality assessment of ethics-aware AI systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1621 / 1650
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making
    Dear, Keith
    [J]. RUSI JOURNAL, 2019, 164 (5-6): : 18 - 25
  • [2] Optimization, Decision-making and Artificial Intelligence
    Mittal, Mandeep
    Shah, Nita H.
    [J]. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2022, 15 (01):
  • [3] Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making
    Loftus, Tyler J.
    Tighe, Patrick J.
    Filiberto, Amanda C.
    Efron, Philip A.
    Brakenridge, Scott C.
    Mohr, Alicia M.
    Rashidi, Parisa
    Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr.
    Bihorac, Azra
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (02) : 148 - 158
  • [4] Large-Scale decision-making: Characterization, taxonomy, challenges and future directions from an Artificial Intelligence and applications perspective
    Ding, Ru-Xi
    Palomares, Ivan
    Wang, Xueqing
    Yang, Guo-Rui
    Liu, Bingsheng
    Dong, Yucheng
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    Herrera, Francisco
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 59 : 84 - 102
  • [5] Artificial intelligence and decision-making in government functions: opportunities, challenges and future research
    Alshahrani, Albandari
    Griva, Anastasia
    Dennehy, Denis
    Mantymaki, Matti
    [J]. TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY, 2024,
  • [6] Use of Artificial Intelligence in Regulatory Decision-Making
    Jago, Robert
    Gaag, Anna van der
    Stathis, Kostas
    Petej, Ivan
    Lertvittayakumjorn, Piyawat
    Krishnamurthy, Yamuna
    Gao, Yang
    Silva, Juan Caceres
    Webster, Michelle
    Gallagher, Ann
    Austin, Zubin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION, 2021, 12 (03) : 11 - 19
  • [7] Algorithms and Decision-Making in Military Artificial Intelligence
    Garcia, Denise
    [J]. GLOBAL SOCIETY, 2024, 38 (01) : 24 - 33
  • [8] Artificial intelligence for decision-making and the future of work
    Dennehy, Denis
    Griva, Anastasia
    Pouloudi, Nancy
    Mantymakid, Matti
    Pappas, Ilias
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 69
  • [9] Accessing Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision-Making
    Giordano, Chris
    Brennan, Meghan
    Mohamed, Basma
    Rashidi, Parisa
    Modave, Francois
    Tighe, Patrick
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2021, 3
  • [10] Improving Group Decision-Making by Artificial Intelligence
    Xia, Lirong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, : 5156 - 5160