Is the Robotic Assisted Hybrid Approach Increasing the MIS efficiency for Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

被引:0
|
作者
Copaescu, Catalin [1 ,2 ]
Dumbrava, Bogdan [1 ]
机构
[1] Ponderas Acad Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Ponderas Acad Hosp, Surg, Nicolae Caramfil St 85 A,Dist 1, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
pancreaticoduodenectomy; minimal-invasive; robotic-assisted; hybrid; laparoscopy; LAPAROSCOPIC PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATECTOMY; METAANALYSIS; EXPERIENCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.3.p.302
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Pancreaticoduodenectomy, commonly known as the Whipple procedure, is a complex surgical technique employed for the treatment of various pancreatic and periampullary pathologies. Minimally invasive PD was created in an attempt to enhance the outcomes of the traditional, open technique. However, the reconstruction phase has been recognized as a substantial barrier to widespread adoption of the laparoscopic technique. Several research appraisals and case studies recommend the robotic technique as a facilitator during the reconstruction steps. We propose a hybrid approach to combine the versatility of laparoscopy and the visual and motor advantages of the DaVinci Xi in order to maximize the precision of the reconstruction. Our suggestion is based on the experience that our institution has had with the standardization of different surgical procedures and protocols.Methods: This article is focused on the outcomes of robotic assisted PD in our institution. Eleven patients underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic PD between 1st January, 2020 and 7th March, 2023 (N=11). There were two approaches involved: hybrid PD type A (N=6) and hybrid PD type B (N=5). Of the eleven patients who underwent hybrid PD, most of them were men (81.8%) and mean age was 61.9 years-old (range 45 to 75 years). The mean operative duration was 618 minutes (range 480 to 780 minutes). Mean blood loss was 159 mL (range 50 to 350 mL). Ten operations were performed for malignancy and one for neuroendocrine duodenal tumour; the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved was 16.2 (range 11 to 24 nodes) and all the specimens were reported by pathology as R0. Mean hospital stay was 18 days (range 8 to 40 days). Reoperations were necessary in five patients (N=5), all from the type A group, and mortality occurred in one (N=1) patient. There were no conversions to open surgery during the index procedures as well as no clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulae. Thirty-day mortality was nil, with 1 mortality at 90-days due to massive pulmonary embolism.Conclusions: The hybrid approach facilitates the advantages of both laparoscopic and robotic approaches. While laparoscopy is safer in manipulating the bowel and allows the Roux en Y reconstruction and gastro-pancreatic anastomosis, the robotic assistance enables the surgeon to perform delicate anastomosis with a high accuracy. The learning curve's most important element is standardization and careful patient selection along with a stepwise approach.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 313
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: the results of a case-matched comparison
    Marino, Marco Vito
    Podda, Mauro
    Gomez Ruiz, Marcos
    Cagigas Fernandez, Carmen
    Guarrasi, Domenico
    Gomez Fleitas, Manuel
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (03) : 493 - 502
  • [32] The Role of BMI on Postoperative Outcomes after Open vs Robotic-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Wong, William G.
    Perez Holguin, Rolfy A.
    Pham, Jonatham
    Pameijer, Colette R.
    Dixon, Matthew E.
    Peng, June S.
    Vining, Charles C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 235 (05) : S156 - S157
  • [33] Total laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: which one is better?
    Choi, Munseok
    Rho, Seoung Yoon
    Kim, Sung Hyun
    Hwang, Ho Kyoung
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Kang, Chang Moo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (12): : 8959 - 8966
  • [34] Safety and learning curve analysis of robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: experience of a single surgeon
    Yu, Yang
    Changyong, E.
    Lin, Chao
    Wang, Lun
    Jiang, Tao
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [35] Total laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: which one is better?
    Munseok Choi
    Seoung Yoon Rho
    Sung Hyun Kim
    Ho Kyoung Hwang
    Woo Jung Lee
    Chang Moo Kang
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 8959 - 8966
  • [36] Robotic-assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Technique Description and Performance Evaluation After 60 Cases
    Marino, Marco, V
    Podda, Mauro
    Pisanu, Adolfo
    di Saverio, Salomone
    Fleitas, Manuel G.
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (02): : 156 - 163
  • [37] Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: the results of a case-matched comparison
    Marco Vito Marino
    Mauro Podda
    Marcos Gomez Ruiz
    Carmen Cagigas Fernandez
    Domenico Guarrasi
    Manuel Gomez Fleitas
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 14 : 493 - 502
  • [38] Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection
    Chalikonda, S.
    Aguilar-Saavedra, J. R.
    Walsh, R. M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (09): : 2397 - 2402
  • [39] Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection
    S. Chalikonda
    J. R. Aguilar-Saavedra
    R. M. Walsh
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 2397 - 2402
  • [40] ROBOTIC ASSISTED SACROCOLPOPEXY: TIPS AND TRICKS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY
    Stockwell, E. L.
    Pedroso, J.
    Volker, W.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 : S268 - S268