Measurement of Mobility and Physical Function in Patients Hospitalized With Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review of Instruments and Their Measurement Properties

被引:4
|
作者
Rix, Alana [1 ]
Lawrence, Drew [1 ]
Raper, Eleanor [1 ]
Calthorpe, Sara [1 ]
Holland, Anne E. [1 ,2 ]
Kimmel, Lara A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hlth, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2023年 / 103卷 / 01期
关键词
Hip Fractures; Mobility; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); CUMULATED AMBULATION SCORE; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; GO TEST; HEALTH-STATUS; ACUTE-PHASE; GERIATRIC-PATIENTS; SELF-CARE; PERFORMANCE; MORTALITY; REHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/pzac142
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Hip fractures are common and significantly impact mobility and physical function. Measurement of patient progress post hip fracture in the acute hospital setting is important to monitor early recovery and outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the measurement properties (reliability, validity, responsiveness), interpretability, and clinical utility of instruments used to measure mobility and physical function in patients with hip fracture in the acute hospital setting. Methods Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL) were searched. Studies reporting direct clinician assessment instruments to measure mobility or physical function in patients with hip fracture were included. Data were extracted by 2 reviewers, and the quality of each study was determined using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments risk of bias checklist. Results Sixty-eight studies were included with 19 measurement instruments identified. The most frequently used instruments were the Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG) (19 studies), Barthel Index (BI) (18 studies), Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS) (18 studies), and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) (14 studies). All 4 of these instruments demonstrated good predictive validity (clinical outcomes and mortality) and responsiveness over time (effect sizes 0.63-2.79). The BI and CAS also had good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] >0.70). Floor effects were demonstrated for the TUG, CAS, and FIM (16%-60% of patients). The TUG, CAS, and BI all had good clinical utility. Conclusion Depending on the context (use by treating clinicians, research, benchmarking), 1 or a combination of the BI, CAS, and TUG provide robust measurement of mobility and physical function for patients with hip fracture in the acute hospital setting. Impact This study identified 3 instruments suitable for measuring mobility and physical function in hospitalized patients following hip fracture. This provides clinicians with tools to measure patient progress and benchmark across sites to improve patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measurement properties of instruments for assessment of cervical spine function in infants with torticollis: a systematic review
    Seager, Anthea
    French, Helen
    Meldrum, Dara
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2019, 178 (05) : 657 - 671
  • [22] Measurement properties of instruments for assessment of cervical spine function in infants with torticollis: a systematic review
    Anthea Seager
    Helen French
    Dara Meldrum
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2019, 178 : 657 - 671
  • [23] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES OF INSTRUMENTS TO ASSESS RISK OF FRACTURE IN OLDER PERSONS-AN UPDATE
    Honvo, G.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 36 : S40 - S40
  • [24] Exercise interventions, physical function, and mobility after hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Xiaorui
    Butts, William J.
    You, Tongjian
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (18) : 4986 - 4996
  • [25] Measurement properties of the Dutch–Flemish patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function item bank and instruments: a systematic review
    Inger L. Abma
    Bas J. D. Butje
    Peter M. ten Klooster
    Philip J. van der Wees
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19
  • [26] The psychometric properties of nursing image measurement instruments: A systematic review
    Zhou, Lu
    Sukpasjaroen, Khunanan
    Cai, EnLi
    Moonsri, Kristiya
    Imsiri, Prakobkiat
    Chankoson, Thitinan
    NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (08): : 5056 - 5078
  • [27] Instruments Measuring Physical Activity in Individuals Who Use a Wheelchair: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Lankhorst, Kristel
    Oerbekke, Michiel
    van den Berg-Emons, Rita
    Takken, Tim
    de Groot, Janke
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 101 (03): : 535 - 552
  • [28] Assessing medical professionalism: A systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties
    Li, Honghe
    Ding, Ning
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Liu, Yang
    Wen, Deliang
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):
  • [29] Instruments Measuring Integrated Care: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Bautista, Mary Ann C.
    Nurjono, Milawaty
    Lim, Yee Wei
    Dessers, Ezra
    Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M.
    MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2016, 94 (04): : 862 - 917
  • [30] Informal caregiving in COPD: A systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties
    Cruz, Joana
    Marques, Alda
    Machado, Ana
    O'Hoski, Sachi
    Goldstein, Roger
    Brooks, Dina
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 128 : 13 - 27