The impact of high-pressure political reforms on state-owned enterprises: Evidence from China

被引:5
|
作者
Bae, Sung C. [1 ]
Kwon, Taek Ho [2 ]
Liu, Chenyang [2 ]
机构
[1] Bowling Green State Univ, Schmidthorst Coll Business, Dept Finance, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
[2] Chungnam Natl Univ, Sch Business, Daejon, South Korea
关键词
High-pressure political reforms; State-owned enterprises; Anti -corruption campaign; China; AGENCY COSTS; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; ANTI-CORRUPTION; GOVERNMENT; OWNERSHIP; PRIVATIZATION; INVESTMENT; INCENTIVES; CASH; FIRM;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Taking the case of high-pressure political reforms including the ongoing anti-corruption campaign in China, we investigate the impact of such reforms on the performance of Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) from the agency problem perspective. We report that before the reforms, SOEs significantly underperform non-SOEs in most performance measures, consistent with the existing evidence. Following the reforms, however, the per-formance gaps between SOEs and non-SOEs become insignificant or even reversed. Our results of positive im-pacts of the reforms on overall performance, cost control, operating efficiency and cash positions and their negative impacts on investment levels and efficiency for SOEs are in supportive of our hypotheses based on the agency theory. We further find that the state as SOEs' controlling shareholder is the primary beneficiary of the reforms through higher tax collections from SOEs, though incurring a loss in shareholder stock returns. We also report a few cases of industry heterogeneity in the impacts. Our results lend strong evidence that the political reforms empower the state to deter SOEs' corrupt practices and align their business decisions with the state's political objectives mainly by mitigating agency problems in Chinese SOEs.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Do state-owned enterprises prefer capital from private enterprises with better ESG performance? Evidence from China's mixed ownership reforms
    Wei, Feng
    Zhou, Lei
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 62
  • [32] The Siamese twins: Do state-owned banks favor state-owned enterprises in China?
    Wei, SJ
    Wang, T
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1997, 8 (01) : 19 - 29
  • [33] Appointments of outsiders as CEOs, state-owned enterprises, and firm performance: Evidence from China
    Jiang, Fuxiu
    Huang, Jicheng
    Kim, Kenneth A.
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2013, 23 : 49 - 64
  • [34] Aversion to the use of foreign exchange hedging in state-owned enterprises: Evidence from China
    Wang, Xin
    Hao, Xiaobei
    Sun, Yue
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 88
  • [35] Study on Innovation of State-Owned Enterprises in China
    Guo Pibin
    Zhou Xijun
    ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, PT 1, 2008, : 803 - +
  • [36] Competition Policy and State-Owned Enterprises in China
    Kovacic, William E.
    WORLD TRADE REVIEW, 2017, 16 (04) : 693 - 711
  • [37] Productivity and efficiency of state-owned enterprises in China
    Feng-Cheng Fu
    Chu-Ping C. Vijverberg
    Yong-Sheng Chen
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2008, 29 : 249 - 259
  • [38] Reforming China's State-owned Enterprises
    Kratz, Agatha
    CHINA PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 1 : 94 - 96
  • [39] The Deregulation of State-Owned Enterprises in India and China
    Lawrence Sáez
    Joy Yang
    Comparative Economic Studies, 2001, 43 (3) : 69 - 97
  • [40] Does corruption shape firm centralisation? Evidence from state-owned enterprises in China
    Kong, Dongmin
    Zhu, Ling
    Qin, Ni
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2022, 62 (03): : 3365 - 3395