The predictive value of the dynamic risk outcome scales (DROS) for recidivism in (forensic) clients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning

被引:2
|
作者
Delforterie, M. J. [1 ,2 ]
Hesper, B. L. [1 ]
Nijman, H. L. I. [2 ,3 ]
Korzilius, H. P. L. M. [4 ]
Turhan, A. [1 ,2 ]
Didden, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Trajectum Specialized & Forens Care, Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Behav Sci Inst, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Fivoor Specialized & Forens Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
borderline intellectual functioning; DROS; HKT-30; mild intellectual disability; recidivism; risk assessment; VIOLENCE RISK; OFFENDERS; ADULTS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1111/jar.13090
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe dynamic risk outcome scales (DROS) was developed to assess treatment progress of clients with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning using dynamic risk factors. We studied the predictive value of the DROS on various classifications and severity levels of recidivism. MethodData of 250 forensic clients with intellectual disabilities were linked to recidivism data from the Judicial Information Service in the Netherlands. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were used to determine the predictive values. ResultsThe DROS total score could not significantly predict recidivism. A DROS recidivism subscale predicted general, violent and other recidivism. These predictive values were comparable to those of a Dutch tool validated for risk assessment in the general forensic population. ConclusionsThe DROS recidivism subscale predicted various classifications of recidivism better than chance. At present, the DROS appears to have no added value beyond the HKT-30 for the purpose of risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 757
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [41] Peer-Influence on Risk-Taking in Male Adolescents with Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disabilities and/or Behavior Disorders
    Bexkens, Anika
    Huizenga, Hilde M.
    Neville, David A.
    d'Escury-Koenigs, Annematt L. Collot
    Bredman, Joren C.
    Wagemaker, Eline
    Van der Molen, Maurits W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 47 (03) : 543 - 555
  • [42] Peer-Influence on Risk-Taking in Male Adolescents with Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disabilities and/or Behavior Disorders
    Anika Bexkens
    Hilde M. Huizenga
    David A. Neville
    Annematt L. Collot d’Escury-Koenigs
    Joren C. Bredman
    Eline Wagemaker
    Maurits W. Van der Molen
    [J]. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2019, 47 : 543 - 555
  • [43] ASSESSING MENTALIZING IN PEOPLE WITH MILD TO BORDERLINE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES AND TYPICALLY DEVELOPING PERSONS: RESULTS OF THE REFLECTIVE FUNCTIONING QUESTIONNAIRE AND THE ASSOCIATION WITH AUTISTIC TRAITS
    Derks, S. D. M.
    Andries, V. M. M.
    de Bildt, A.
    Willemen, A. M.
    Sterkenburg, P. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2023, 67 (10) : 919 - 919
  • [44] Brief Symptom Inventory symptom profiles of outpatients with borderline intellectual functioning and major depressive disorder or posttraumatic stress disorder: Comparison with patients from regular mental health care and patients with Mild Intellectual Disabilities
    Wieland, Jannelien
    Zitman, Frans G.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2016, 51-52 : 153 - 159
  • [45] Relationships between dynamic risk factors for externalising problem behaviour and group climate in adults with mild intellectual disability in forensic treatment
    Turhan, A.
    Delforterie, M. J.
    Roest, J. J.
    Van Der Helm, G. H. P.
    Neimeijer, E. G.
    Didden, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2023, 36 (03) : 641 - 652