Comparison of Parameter Estimation Methods Based on Two Additive Biomass Models with Small Samples

被引:3
|
作者
Xiong, Nina [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Qiao, Yue [3 ]
Ren, Huiru [3 ]
Zhang, Li [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Rihui [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Jia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Beijing Key Lab Precise Forestry, 35 Qinghua East Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Forestry Inst, 35 Qinghua East Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Municipal Inst City Management, Management Res Dept, Jia 48 Shangjialou, Beijing 100028, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Municipal Inst City Management, Beijing Key Lab Municipal Solid Wastes Testing Ana, Jia 48 Shangjialou, Beijing 100028, Peoples R China
来源
FORESTS | 2023年 / 14卷 / 08期
关键词
tree biomass; additive biomass model; GMM; log transformation; NSUR; small samples; ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; TREE BIOMASS; EQUATIONS; ALLOMETRY;
D O I
10.3390/f14081655
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Accurately estimating tree biomass is crucial for monitoring and managing forest resources, and understanding regional climate change and material cycles. The additive model system has proven reliable for biomass estimation in Chinese forestry since it considers the inherent correlation among variables based on allometric equations. However, due to the increasing difficulty of obtaining a substantial amount of sample data, estimating parameters for the additive model equations becomes a formidable challenge when working with limited sample sizes. This study primarily focuses on analyzing these parameters using data extracted from a smaller sample. Here, we established two additive biomass model systems using the independent diameter and the combined variable that comprises diameter and tree height. The logarithmic Nonlinear Seemingly Uncorrelated (logarithmic NSUR) method and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) method were applied to estimate the parameters of these models. By comparing four distinct approaches, the following key results were obtained: (1) Both the GMM and logarithmic NSUR methods can yield satisfactory goodness of fit and estimation precision for the additive biomass equations, with the root mean square error (RMSE) were significantly low, and coefficients of determination (R-2) were mostly higher than 0.9. (2) Comparatively, examining the fitted curves of predicted values, the GMM method provided better fitting than the NSUR method. The GMM method with the combined variable is the most suggested approach for the calculation and research of single-tree biomass models with a small sample size.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Parameter estimation methods for single neuron models
    Tabak, J
    Murphey, CR
    Moore, LE
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 9 (03) : 215 - 236
  • [22] Computational Methods for Parameter Estimation in Climate Models
    Villagran, Alejandro
    Huerta, Gabriel
    Jackson, Charles S.
    Sen, Mrinal K.
    BAYESIAN ANALYSIS, 2008, 3 (04): : 823 - +
  • [23] Methods for Parameter Estimation in Wine Fermentation Models
    Coleman, Robert
    Nelson, James
    Boulton, Roger
    FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2024, 10 (08):
  • [24] Parameter Estimation Methods for Single Neuron Models
    Joël Tabak
    C. Richard Murphey
    L.E. Moore
    Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 2000, 9 : 215 - 236
  • [25] Likelihood-Based Parameter Estimation and Comparison of Dynamical Cognitive Models
    Schuett, Heiko H.
    Rothkegel, Lars O. M.
    Trukenbrod, Hans A.
    Reich, Sebastian
    Wichmann, Felix A.
    Engbert, Ralf
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2017, 124 (04) : 505 - 524
  • [26] Estimation Methods Comparison of SVAR Models with a Mixture of Two Normal Distributions
    Maciejowska, Katarzyna
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC MODELLING AND ECONOMETRICS, 2010, 2 (04): : 279 - 314
  • [27] A comparison of methods for the fitting of generalized additive models
    Harald Binder
    Gerhard Tutz
    Statistics and Computing, 2008, 18 : 87 - 99
  • [28] A comparison of methods for the fitting of generalized additive models
    Binder, Harald
    Tutz, Gerhard
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2008, 18 (01) : 87 - 99
  • [29] Comparison of parameter estimation methods in stochastic chemical kinetic models: Examples in systems biology
    Gupta, Ankur
    Rawlings, James B.
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2014, 60 (04) : 1253 - 1268
  • [30] Comparison of parameter estimation methods for reliability model
    Wang X.-F.
    Shen G.-X.
    Zhang Y.-Z.
    Chen B.-K.
    Zheng S.
    Liu W.
    Huanan Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science), 2011, 39 (06): : 47 - 52