Pathway and Cost-Benefit Analysis to Achieve China?s Zero Hydrofluorocarbon Emissions

被引:9
|
作者
Bai, Fuli [1 ,2 ]
An, Minde [3 ]
Wu, Jing [4 ]
Fang, Xuekun [1 ]
Jiang, Pengnan [1 ]
Yao, Bo [5 ]
Zhao, Xingchen [1 ]
Xiang, Xueying [1 ]
Chen, Ziwei [1 ]
Hu, Jianxin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] MIT, Ctr Global Change Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[5] Fudan Univ, Inst Atmospher Sci, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China
关键词
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs); near-zero emissions; climate change mitigation; cost-benefit; China; HFC EMISSIONS; PROJECTIONS; TRENDS; ABUNDANCES;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.3c00166
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) cumulative emissions will be more than 20 Gt CO2-equiv during 2020-2060 and have a non-negligible impact on global warming even in full compliance with the Kigali Amendment (KA). Fluorochemical manufacturers (including multinationals) in China have accounted for about 70% of global HFC production since 2015, of which about 60% is emitted outside China. This study built an integrated model (i.e., DECAF) estimate both territorial and exported emissions of China under three scenarios and assess the corresponding climate effects as well as abatement costs. Achieving near-zero territorial emissions by 2060 could avoid 23 +/- 4 Gt CO2-equiv of cumulative territorial emissions (compared to the 2019 Baseline scenario) during 2020-2060 at an average abatement cost of 9 +/- 6 USD/t CO2-equiv. Under the near-zero emission (including territorial and abroad) pathway, radiative forcing from HFCs will peak in 2037 (60 +/- 6 mW/m2) with a 33% peak reduction and 8 years in advance compared to the path regulated by the KA, and the radiative forcing by 2060 will be lower than that in 2019. Accelerated phase-out of HFC production in China could provide a possibility for rapid global HFC abatement and achieve greater climate benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:6474 / 6484
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-benefit analysis of China's farming system
    Suo, Xinhao
    Cao, Shixiong
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2021, 113 (03) : 2407 - 2416
  • [2] Cost-Benefit Analysis of China's Internet Content Regulation
    Song, Qiang
    Li, Gang
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION ASSURANCE AND SECURITY, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 571 - 575
  • [3] Cost-benefit analysis for China's Grain for Green Program
    Xian, Junli
    Xia, Chengqi
    Cao, Shixiong
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 151 (151)
  • [4] Cost-benefit analysis of ecosystem services in China
    Cao, Shixiong
    Yu, Zhongqi
    Zhang, Junze
    Feng, Fei
    Xu, Duanyang
    Mu, Xingmin
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 125 : 143 - 148
  • [5] A cost-benefit analysis for the economic growth in China
    Wen, Zongguo
    Chen, Jining
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (02) : 356 - 366
  • [6] Cost-Benefit Analysis of China's Natural Forest Conservation Program
    Ma, Zihao
    Xia, Chengqi
    Cao, Shixiong
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2020, 55
  • [7] Cost-benefit analysis of net zero energy campus residence
    Raffio, Gregory
    Mertz, George
    Kissock, Kelly
    Proceedings of the ASME International Solar Energy Conference, 2007, : 567 - 575
  • [8] Cost-benefit analysis
    Miura, Grant
    NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (10) : 903 - 903
  • [9] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BJORNSTAD, P
    KJEMI, 1975, 35 (10): : 3 - 3
  • [10] Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Concentrated Solar Power in China
    Yang, Shuxia
    Zhu, Xianguo
    Guo, Weishang
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018