Protein pattern and physiological responses to drought stress in wheat landraces

被引:1
|
作者
Khalvandi, M. [1 ]
Siosemardeh, A. [1 ]
Bahramnejad, B. [1 ]
Roohi, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kurdistan, Fac Agr, Dept Agron & Plant Breeding, POB, Sanandaj 6617715175, Iran
[2] Agr Res & Nat Resources Ctr Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
关键词
Drought stress; ROS scavenger; Wheat; SSI; PROLINE; RESISTANCE; PLANTS; ACID; STABILITY; SALINITY;
D O I
10.1007/s42976-023-00365-7
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Drought stress by affecting many physiological aspects of crop plants can limit their productivity in the all-around world. In this study, a field experiment was carried out to investigate the changes in nutrient elements (P, K, Fe and Ca) concentrations, membrane electrolyte leakage, antioxidative enzymes, lipid peroxidation and the intensity of polypeptides of twelve wheat landraces leaves in response to the drought stress conditions. The results showed that PPO, SOD, proline, membrane electrolyte leakage as well as lipid peroxidation were obviously increased under drought stress conditions, while it reduced protein content, P, Fe, Ca and K + concentrations. Moreover, under drought stress conditions, the lowest minerals uptake, cell membrane stability, antioxidant enzymatic activity, and the abundance of some protein spots were observed in Gawdare, Awihang and Khoshab, while the highest was obtained in Tazeabad, Siosemarde, and Baharband, which was related to their ability in ameliorating the negative effects of drought stress by increasing ROS scavenging activities (PPO and SOD), polypeptides expression, proline, nutrient absorption as well as membrane integrity. On the other hand, selecting resistant landraces with higher cell membrane integrity, nutrient uptake and ROS scavenger activity seems to be a promising method that could be used to cope with drought stress on wheat.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 163
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Physiological Responses of Two Wheat Cultivars to Soil Drought
    Chipilski, Radoslav R.
    Kocheva, Konstantina V.
    Nenova, Veselina R.
    Georgiev, Georgi I.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATURFORSCHUNG SECTION C-A JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 2012, 67 (3-4): : 181 - 186
  • [22] Differential physiological responses to salt stress in rice landraces in Thailand
    Nounjan, Noppawan
    Sanitchon, Jirawat
    Pamuta, Dechudom
    Theerakulpisut, Piyada
    NOTULAE BOTANICAE HORTI AGROBOTANICI CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2024, 52 (03)
  • [23] Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Watermelon Landraces to Water Deficit Stress
    Rouen, A.
    Baghizadeh, A.
    Roghami, M.
    Mousavi, A.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 70 (06)
  • [24] Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Watermelon Landraces to Water Deficit Stress
    A. Rouen
    A. Baghizadeh
    M. Roghami
    A. Mousavi
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2023, 70
  • [25] Physiological and biochemical responses of sorghum to drought stress
    Goche, T.
    Chivasa, S.
    Ngara, R.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 109 : 336 - 336
  • [26] Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Medicagotruncatula to Drought Stress
    Hegab, M. M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2016, 56 (03): : 895 - 912
  • [27] Physiological Responses of Almond Genotypes to Drought Stress
    Gohari, S.
    Imani, A.
    Talaei, A. R.
    Abdossi, V.
    Asghari, M. R.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 70 (06)
  • [28] Physiological Responses of Almond Genotypes to Drought Stress
    S. Gohari
    A. Imani
    A. R. Talaei
    V. Abdossi
    M. R. Asghari
    Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2023, 70
  • [29] Physiological Responses of Bermudagrasses under Drought Stress
    Arikilla, Snigdha
    Moss, Justin Q.
    Xiang, Mingying
    Fontanier, Charles
    Martin, Dennis
    Wu, Yanqi
    HORTSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (09) : SR49 - SR49
  • [30] Physiological Responses of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cultivars to Drought Stress and Exogenous Methyl Jasmonate
    Zahra Javadipour
    Hamidreza Balouchi
    Mohsen Movahhedi Dehnavi
    Alireza Yadavi
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2022, 41 : 3433 - 3448