Accounting for uncertainty in marine ecosystem service predictions for spatial prioritisation

被引:0
|
作者
Rullens, Vera [1 ]
Stephenson, Fabrice [1 ,2 ]
Townsend, Michael [3 ]
Lohrer, Andrew M. [4 ]
Hewitt, Judi E. [5 ,6 ]
Pilditch, Conrad A. [1 ]
Ellis, Joanne I. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waikato, Sch Sci, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Waikato Reg Council, Hamilton, New Zealand
[4] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Hamilton, New Zealand
[5] Univ Auckland, Dept Stat, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Univ Helsinki, Tvarminne Field Stn, Helsinki, Finland
[7] Univ Waikato, Sch Sci, Tauranga, New Zealand
关键词
bivalves; Ecosystem-Based Management; estuary; mapping; sensitivity analysis; spatial planning; CONSERVATION; RESERVE; RESTORATION; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; ROBUST; AREAS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.13823
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim: Spatial assessments of Ecosystem Services (ES) are increasingly used in environmental management, but rarely provide information on the prediction accuracy. Uncertainty estimates are essential to provide confidence in the quality and credibility of ES assessments for informed decision making. In marine environments, the need for uncertainty assessments for ES is unparalleled as they are data scarce, poorly (spatially) defined, with complex interconnectivity of seascapes. This study illustrates the uncertainty associated with a principle-based method for ES modelling by accounting for model variability, data coverage and uncertainty in thresholds and parameters. Location; Tauranga, New Zealand. Methods; A sensitivity analysis was applied on ES models for marine bivalves (Austrovenus stutchburyi and Paphies australis) and their contribution to Food provision, Water quality regulation, Nitrogen removal and Sediment stabilisation. ES estimates from the sensitivity analysis were compared against baseline ES predictions. Spatial uncertainty patterns were analysed for individual ES through bi-plots and multiple ES through spatial prioritisation using Zonation. Results: Our study showed spatially explicit differences in uncertainty patterns for ES and between species. Food provision had highest maximum uncertainty (>5 points) but also the largest area of high ES and high certainty conditions. Zonation analysis conducted on baseline and conservative ES values showed overall robust outcomes of top 30% area, but important nuances through shifts in top 5% and 10% areas that allowed for a consistently better representation of ES when accounting for uncertainty. Main Conclusions: The spatial prioritisation in combination with the ES uncertainty biplots provide tools for spatial planning of individual and multiple ES to focus on area of highest value with highest certainty and can thereby help reduce risk and aid decision-making at acceptable confidence levels. This type of information is urgently needed in marine ES assessments and their management, but likewise extends to other environments to improve transparency.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Developing spatial biophysical accounting for multiple ecosystem services
    Remme, Roy P.
    Schroter, Matthias
    Hein, Lars
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 10 : 6 - 18
  • [22] Marine Spatial Planning in the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem
    Finke, Gunnar
    Gee, Kira
    Gxaba, Thandiwe
    Sorgenfrei, Roman
    Russo, Vladimir
    Pinto, Duarte
    Nsiangango, Silvi Edith
    Sousa, Lia Neto
    Braby, Rodney
    Alves, Fatima Lopes
    Heinrichs, Bernhard
    Kreiner, Anja
    Amunyela, Maria
    Popose, Gcobani
    Ramakulukusha, Moses
    Naidoo, Ashley
    Mausolf, Elisabeth
    Nsingi, Kumbi Kilongo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 36
  • [23] Spatial complementarity of forests and farms: Accounting for ecosystem services
    Pattanayak, SK
    Butry, DT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 87 (04) : 995 - 1008
  • [24] The Challenge of Implementing the Marine Ecosystem Service Concept
    Townsend, Michael
    Davies, Kate
    Hanley, Nicholas
    Hewitt, Judi E.
    Lundquist, Carolyn J.
    Lohrer, Andrew M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2018, 5
  • [25] Cultural worldviews consistently explain bundles of ecosystem service prioritisation across rural Germany
    Peter, Sophie
    Le Provost, Gaetane
    Mehring, Marion
    Mueller, Thomas
    Manning, Peter
    [J]. PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2022, 4 (01) : 218 - 230
  • [26] Marine natural capital and ecosystem services: An environmental accounting model
    Buonocore, Elvira
    Donnarumma, Luigia
    Appolloni, Luca
    Miccio, Antonino
    Russo, Giovanni F.
    Franzese, Pier Paolo
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2020, 424
  • [27] Ecosystem accounting's potential to support coastal and marine governance
    Chen, Wenting
    Van Assche, Kristof Albert M.
    Hynes, Stephen
    Bekkby, Trine
    Christie, Hartvig C.
    Gundersen, Hege
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2020, 112
  • [28] Spatial Planning Principles for Marine Ecosystem Restoration
    Lester, Sarah E.
    Dubel, Alexandra K.
    Hernan, Gema
    McHenry, Jennifer
    Rassweiler, Andrew
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [29] Spatial predictions and uncertainties of forest carbon fluxes for carbon accounting
    Arnan Araza
    Sytze de Bruin
    Lars Hein
    Martin Herold
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [30] Spatial predictions and uncertainties of forest carbon fluxes for carbon accounting
    Araza, Arnan
    de Bruin, Sytze
    Hein, Lars
    Herold, Martin
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):