Accounting for uncertainty in marine ecosystem service predictions for spatial prioritisation

被引:0
|
作者
Rullens, Vera [1 ]
Stephenson, Fabrice [1 ,2 ]
Townsend, Michael [3 ]
Lohrer, Andrew M. [4 ]
Hewitt, Judi E. [5 ,6 ]
Pilditch, Conrad A. [1 ]
Ellis, Joanne I. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waikato, Sch Sci, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
[2] Newcastle Univ, Sch Nat & Environm Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Waikato Reg Council, Hamilton, New Zealand
[4] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Hamilton, New Zealand
[5] Univ Auckland, Dept Stat, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Univ Helsinki, Tvarminne Field Stn, Helsinki, Finland
[7] Univ Waikato, Sch Sci, Tauranga, New Zealand
关键词
bivalves; Ecosystem-Based Management; estuary; mapping; sensitivity analysis; spatial planning; CONSERVATION; RESERVE; RESTORATION; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; ROBUST; AREAS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.13823
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim: Spatial assessments of Ecosystem Services (ES) are increasingly used in environmental management, but rarely provide information on the prediction accuracy. Uncertainty estimates are essential to provide confidence in the quality and credibility of ES assessments for informed decision making. In marine environments, the need for uncertainty assessments for ES is unparalleled as they are data scarce, poorly (spatially) defined, with complex interconnectivity of seascapes. This study illustrates the uncertainty associated with a principle-based method for ES modelling by accounting for model variability, data coverage and uncertainty in thresholds and parameters. Location; Tauranga, New Zealand. Methods; A sensitivity analysis was applied on ES models for marine bivalves (Austrovenus stutchburyi and Paphies australis) and their contribution to Food provision, Water quality regulation, Nitrogen removal and Sediment stabilisation. ES estimates from the sensitivity analysis were compared against baseline ES predictions. Spatial uncertainty patterns were analysed for individual ES through bi-plots and multiple ES through spatial prioritisation using Zonation. Results: Our study showed spatially explicit differences in uncertainty patterns for ES and between species. Food provision had highest maximum uncertainty (>5 points) but also the largest area of high ES and high certainty conditions. Zonation analysis conducted on baseline and conservative ES values showed overall robust outcomes of top 30% area, but important nuances through shifts in top 5% and 10% areas that allowed for a consistently better representation of ES when accounting for uncertainty. Main Conclusions: The spatial prioritisation in combination with the ES uncertainty biplots provide tools for spatial planning of individual and multiple ES to focus on area of highest value with highest certainty and can thereby help reduce risk and aid decision-making at acceptable confidence levels. This type of information is urgently needed in marine ES assessments and their management, but likewise extends to other environments to improve transparency.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D spatial conservation prioritisation: Accounting for depth in marine environments
    Venegas-Li, Ruben
    Levin, Noam
    Possingham, Hugh
    Kark, Salit
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 9 (03): : 773 - 784
  • [2] Spatial valuation of California marine fisheries as an ecosystem service
    Miller, Rebecca R.
    Field, John C.
    Santora, Jarrod A.
    Monk, Melissa H.
    Kosaka, Rosemary
    Thomson, Cynthia
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2017, 74 (11) : 1732 - 1748
  • [3] Ecosystem service management and spatial prioritisation in a multifunctional landscape in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
    Powers, Breanna F.
    Ausseil, Anne-Gaelle
    Perry, George L. W.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (03) : 275 - 293
  • [4] Unexpected Management Choices When Accounting for Uncertainty in Ecosystem Service Tradeoff Analyses
    Cabral, Reniel B.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Costello, Christopher
    Gaines, Steven D.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (04): : 422 - 430
  • [5] Accounting for uncertainty in predictions of a marine species: Integrating population genetics to verify past distributions
    Chefaoui, Rosa M.
    Serrao, Ester A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2017, 359 : 229 - 239
  • [6] Using ecosystem service assessments to support participatory marine spatial planning
    Friedrich, Laura A.
    Glegg, Gillian
    Fletcher, Stephen
    Dodds, Wendy
    Philippe, Manuelle
    Bailly, Denis
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 188
  • [7] Temporal and spatial predictions of effect of alternative fishing policies for the Gran Canaria marine ecosystem
    Couce Montero, Lorena
    Christensen, Villy
    Bilbao Sieyro, Alberto
    Perez Gonzalez, Yeray
    Jimenez-Alvarado, David
    Castro, Jose J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2019, 94 (06) : 882 - 895
  • [8] Accounting for uncertainty in marine reserve design
    Halpern, BS
    Regan, HM
    Possingham, HP
    McCarthy, MA
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (01) : 2 - 11
  • [9] Designing a framework for marine ecosystem assets accounting
    Wang, Tao
    He, Guang-shun
    Zhou, Qiu-lin
    Gao, Jin-zhu
    Deng, Li-jing
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 163 : 92 - 100
  • [10] Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation
    Matthias Schröter
    Roy P. Remme
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2016, 31 : 431 - 450