Impact of colorectal cancer screening on survival after metachronous metastasis

被引:2
|
作者
Hamers, Patricia A. H. [1 ,2 ]
Vink, Geraldine R. [1 ,3 ]
Elferink, Marloes A. G. [3 ]
Moons, Leon M. G. [4 ]
Punt, Cornelis J. A. [2 ]
May, Anne M. [2 ]
Koopman, Miriam [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Med Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res & Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Gastroenterol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Internal mail Q 05-4-300,PO Box 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Population screening; Survival; Recurrence; Faecal occult blood test; Prognosis; III COLON-CANCER; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; STAGE DISTRIBUTION; LIFE-STYLE; RECURRENCE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113429
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: An increasing proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases in Europe are detected by screening with faecal immunochemical testing (FIT). Previous studies showed that population screening with FIT leads to a decrease in CRC incidence and to detection at an earlier stage. However, approximately twenty percent of patients with CRC without metastases at initial diagnosis still develop metachronous metastases. We investigated the association between detection mode of the primary tumor and overall survival (OS) after metachronous metastasis in patients with CRC.Methods: Nationwide registry-based data was obtained of 794 patients who developed metachronous metastases after being diagnosed with stage I-III CRC between January and June 2015. With multivariable Cox PH regression modelling, we analyzed the (causal) association between detection mode of the primary tumor (FIT screen-detected versus non-screen-detected) and OS after metachronous metastasis while adjusting for potential confounders.Results: Median OS and five-year OS after metachronous metastasis were significantly higher for patients with screen-detected (n = 152) vs. non-screen-detected primary tumors (n = 642): 38.3 vs. 19.2 months, and 35.4% vs. 18.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). After adjustment for potential confounders, the association between detection mode and OS after metachronous metastasis remained significant (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.56-0.89]). Conclusions: Screen-detection of the primary tumor was independently associated with longer OS after metachronous metastasis. This may support the clinical utility of the population screening program and it shows the prognostic value of detection mode of the primary tumor once metachronous metastasis is diagnosed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IMPACT OF BREAST AND COLORECTAL CANCER ON SURVIVAL AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
    Angela, Webster
    Patrick, Kelly
    Andrew, Hayen
    Germaine, Wong
    Jeremy, Chapman
    Jonathan, Craig
    IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY, 2009, 87 (06): : A28 - A28
  • [32] Pulmonary metastasectomy for metachronous metastasis of esophageal cancer after esophagectomy
    Motohiro Hirao
    Hideyasu Omiya
    Koji Takami
    Kazuyoshi Yamamoto
    Kazuhiro Nishikawa
    Masataka Ikeda
    Atsushi Miyamoto
    Naoki Hama
    Masakazu Miyake
    Mamoru Uemura
    Sakae Maeda
    Shoji Nakamori
    Mitsugu Sekimoto
    Esophagus, 2016, 13 : 163 - 166
  • [33] Pulmonary metastasectomy for metachronous metastasis of esophageal cancer after esophagectomy
    Hirao, Motohiro
    Omiya, Hideyasu
    Takami, Koji
    Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi
    Nishikawa, Kazuhiro
    Ikeda, Masataka
    Miyamoto, Atsushi
    Hama, Naoki
    Miyake, Masakazu
    Uemura, Mamoru
    Maeda, Sakae
    Nakamori, Shoji
    Sekimoto, Mitsugu
    ESOPHAGUS, 2016, 13 (02) : 163 - 166
  • [34] Overall risk and risk factors for metachronous peritoneal metastasis after colorectal cancer surgery: a nationwide cohort study
    Ravn, S.
    Heide-Jorgensen, U.
    Christiansen, C. E.
    Vervvaal, V. J.
    Hagemann-Madsen, R. H.
    Iversen, L. H.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (02): : 284 - 292
  • [35] TDGF1 is a novel predictive marker for metachronous metastasis of colorectal cancer
    Miyoshi, Norikatsu
    Ishii, Hideshi
    Mimori, Koshi
    Sekimoto, Mitsugu
    Doki, Yuichiro
    Mori, Masaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 36 (03) : 563 - 568
  • [36] Impact of diverticulosis and polypectomy on risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer
    Fiori, James
    Kim, Steven
    Wallace, Marina H.
    Rankin, Samantha
    Ayonrinde, Oyekoya
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 39 : 33 - 33
  • [37] Incidence and Survival in Synchronous and Metachronous Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer
    Reboux, Noemi
    Jooste, Valerie
    Goungounga, Juste
    Robaszkiewicz, Michel
    Nousbaum, Jean-Baptiste
    Bouvier, Anne-Marie
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (10) : E2236666
  • [38] Multielectrode Radiofrequency Ablation for Resectable Metachronous Liver Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer
    Cheng, Hou-Ying
    Huang, Kai-Wen
    Liang, Jin-Tung
    Lin, Been-Ren
    Huang, John
    Hung, Ji-Shiang
    Chen, Chi-Ling
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (16)
  • [39] Assessment of Primary Colorectal Cancer CT Radiomics to Predict Metachronous Liver Metastasis
    Li, Yue
    Gong, Jing
    Shen, Xigang
    Li, Menglei
    Zhang, Huan
    Feng, Feng
    Tong, Tong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [40] Metachronous colorectal cancer metastasis: Who, what, when and what to do about it
    Cohen, Ryan
    Platell, Cameron F.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 129 (01) : 71 - 77