Profitability of Solar Photovoltaic Projects: A Sensitivity Analysis of Performance Loss Curves and Operation and Maintenance Expenses

被引:4
|
作者
Virtuani, Alessandro [1 ]
Morganti, Luca [1 ]
机构
[1] Officina Sole OSole, I-20145 Milan, Italy
关键词
maintenance; operation; photovoltaics; profitability; reliability; repowering; revamping; LESSONS LEARNT; DEGRADATION; EXPOSURE; MODULES; SAFETY; PLANT;
D O I
10.1002/solr.202200663
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Literature highlights the fact that degradation curves are frequently not linear. This technical knowledge is, however, neglected by developers, which continues to use simplified linear degradation rates to assess the profitability of solar photovoltaic (PV) projects. Herein, the unleveraged equity interest return rate (IRR) of utility-scale (50 MWp in size) PV projects deployed in different parts of Europe is computed and a sensitivity analysis of how the profitability of the plant is impacted when nonlinear degradation curves are used is carried out. In general, a 2-step performance loss curve leads to the highest project-IRRs at equal total loss, whereas the lowest IRRs are achieved if module degradation is undergoing a negative logarithmic or exponential curve. Further, the sensitivity of profitability to the different degradation trajectories increases at higher latitudes for which the absolute project-IRR is lower. Then, a similar analysis is performed mimicking situations that would lead to a significant revamping of the PV plant after 10 years of operation. This allows us to identify thresholds for overall module degradation that would justify this kind of intervention. Finally, the impact that loss rates and combined operation-maintenance and insurance costs have on the project IRR is highlighted.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance assessment of grid-interactive solar photovoltaic projects under India's national solar mission
    Purohit, Ishan
    Purohit, Pallav
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 222 : 25 - 41
  • [32] Comparative analysis of photovoltaic performance metrics for reliable performance loss rate
    Lee, HyunYong
    Lee, Jungi
    Kim, Nac-Woo
    Lee, Byung-Tak
    IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION, 2023, 17 (04) : 1008 - 1019
  • [33] Analysis of photovoltaic system performance time series: Seasonality and performance loss
    Phinikarides, Alexander
    Makrides, George
    Zinsser, Bastian
    Schubert, Markus
    Georghiou, George E.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 77 : 51 - 63
  • [34] Sensitivity analysis and more accurate solution of photovoltaic solar cell parameters
    Zhu, Xue-Gui
    Fu, Zhi-Hong
    Long, Xing-Ming
    Xin-Li
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2011, 85 (02) : 393 - 403
  • [35] Performance and energy loss mechanism of bifacial photovoltaic modules at a solar carport system
    Hwang, Sungho
    Kang, Yoonmook
    Lee, Hae-seok
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (08) : 2866 - 2884
  • [36] Operation and performance of grid-connected solar photovoltaic power system in Kocaeli university
    Aktas, Ahmet
    Ozdemir, Engin
    Karakaya, Abdulhakim
    Ucar, Mehmet
    JOURNAL OF OPTOELECTRONICS AND ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2013, 15 (5-6): : 559 - 564
  • [37] Operation performance of a solar photovoltaic system using assisted cooling by geothermal heat exchangers
    Lu, Fuwei
    Wang, Huajun
    Guo, Yi
    Wang, Sen
    Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2019, 40 (06): : 1626 - 1631
  • [38] A comprehensive analysis of real options in solar photovoltaic projects: A cluster-based approach
    Jimenez-Gomez, L. M.
    Velasquez-Henao, J. D.
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (16)
  • [39] Sensitivity Analysis on Some Profitability Indices for Photovoltaic Grid-Connected Systems on Buildings: The Case of Two Top Photovoltaic European Areas
    Talavera, D. L.
    Nofuentes, G.
    de la Casa, J.
    Aguilera, J.
    JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2013, 135 (01):
  • [40] Performance assessment and degradation analysis of solar photovoltaic technologies: A review
    Kumar, Manish
    Kumar, Arun
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 : 554 - 587