Supporting meaningful research partnerships: an interview study applying behavior change theory to develop relevant recommendations for researchers

被引:1
|
作者
Shwed, Alanna [1 ,2 ]
Giroux, Emily E. [1 ,2 ]
Hoekstra, Femke [1 ,2 ]
McKay, Rhyann C. [3 ]
Schaefer, Lee [4 ]
West, Christopher R. [2 ,5 ]
McPhail, Lowell T. [2 ]
Sibley, Kathryn M. [6 ]
McBride, Christopher B. [7 ]
Munro, Barry [8 ]
Kaiser, Anita [9 ]
Gainforth, Heather L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia Okanagan, Fac Hlth & Social Dev, Sch Hlth & Exercise Sci, Kelowna, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Int Collaborat Repair Discoveries ICORD, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Coll Hlth Sci, Publ Hlth, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Kinesiol, Saskatoon, BC, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Dept Cellular & Physiol Sci, Saskatoon, BC, Canada
[6] Univ Manitoba, Rady Fac Hlth Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[7] Spinal Cord Injury BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[8] North Amer Spinal Cord Injury Consortium, Niagara Falls, NY USA
[9] Univ Toronto, Rehabil Sci Inst, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Research partnership; Spinal cord injury; Knowledge translation; Behavior change theory; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION; REHABILITATION RESEARCH; PRIORITIES;
D O I
10.1093/tbm/ibad040
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
How can we transform research systems to support researchers to meaningfully partner? Getting clear on barriers and facilitators faced by researchers adopting a meaningful research partnership approach. Lay Summary Research partnerships, which expand beyond researchers solely working with other researchers, are said to be promising for helping to move research into practice. However, there is a lack in understanding of how to support meaningful research partnerships with those who are not part of academia. This study interviewed spinal cord injury researchers to understand what helps and prevents them from deciding to partner when conducting research projects. Results suggest that researchers do not lack motivation to partner; however, their ability and opportunity to do so is lacking. Overall, support is needed to help researchers understand how to work in partnership within the research system. Research partnerships, while promising for ensuring translation of relevant and useable findings, are challenging and need support. This study aimed to apply behavior change theory to understand and support researchers' adoption of a research partnership approach and the Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) Guiding Principles for conducting and disseminating spinal cord injury (SCI) research in partnership. Using an IKT approach, SCI researchers across Canada and the USA completed a survey (n = 22) and were interviewed (n = 13) to discuss barriers and facilitators to deciding to partner and follow the IKT Guiding Principles. The Behaviour Change Wheel, Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and Mode of Delivery Ontology were used to develop the survey, interview questions, and guided analyses of interview data. COM-B and TDF factors were examined using descriptive statistics and abductive analyses of barriers and facilitators of decisions to partner and/or use the IKT Guiding Principles. TDF domains from the interview transcripts were then used to identify intervention, content, and implementation options. 142 factors (79 barriers, 63 facilitators) related to deciding to partner, and 292 factors (187 barriers, 105 facilitators) related to deciding to follow the IKT Guiding Principles were identified. Barriers to partnering or use the IKT Guiding Principles were primarily related to capability and opportunity and relevant intervention options were recommended. Interventions must support researchers in understanding how to partner and use the IKT Guiding Principles while navigating a research system, which is not always supportive of the necessary time and costs required for meaningful research partnerships.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:833 / 844
页数:12
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] TRANSLATING SCIENCE THROUGH MEANINGFUL RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS: APPLYING BEHAVIOUR CHANGE THEORY TO DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS
    Shwed, Alanna
    Giroux, Emily E.
    Hoekstra, Femke
    Mckay, Rhyann
    Schaefer, Lee
    West, Christopher
    McPhail, Lowell T.
    Sibley, Kathryn
    McBride, Christopher B.
    Munro, Barry
    Kaiser, Anita
    Gainforth, Heather
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2023, 57 : S245 - S245
  • [2] A theory of (research) practice makes sense in sensemaking Applying Bourdieu's critical social theory to the study of sensemaking change
    van Hilten, Adriana
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 34 (04) : 794 - 809
  • [3] Using theory of change frameworks to develop evaluation strategies for research engagement: results of a pre-pilot study
    MacQueen, Kathleen M.
    Eley, Natalie T.
    Frick, Mike
    Hamilton, Carol
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2018, 21
  • [4] Applying a logical theory of change for strengthening research uptake in policy: a case study of the Evidence Informed Decision Making Network of the Caribbean
    Yearwood, Andrea C.
    REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 42
  • [5] Using an inverted funnel analogy to develop a theory of change supporting resilient ecosystem-based adaptation in the Great Lakes Basin: a case study of Lincoln, Ontario, Canada
    Vasseur, Liette
    May, Bradley
    Caspell, Meredith
    Marino, Alex
    Garg, Pulkit
    Baker, Jocelyn
    Gauthier, Samantha
    FACETS, 2022, 7 : 1348 - 1366