Multi-objective time-energy-impact optimization for robotic excavator trajectory planning

被引:7
|
作者
Feng, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Jinye [3 ]
Ding, Nan [4 ]
Shen, Fangping [4 ]
Yin, Chenbo [5 ]
Cao, Donghui [6 ]
Li, Chunbiao [1 ]
Liu, Tao [1 ]
Xie, Jiaxue [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Wuxi Cosmo Suspended Platform Co Ltd, Wuxi 214128, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Comp Sci, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Changwang Sch Honors, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Tech Univ, United Inst Excavator Key Technol, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
[6] SANY Grp Co Ltd, Suzhou 215300, Peoples R China
关键词
Excavator; Hydraulic system; Trajectory planning; Particle swarm optimization algorithm; SMOOTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105094
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Single-objective optimal trajectory cannot adapt to the complex requirements of excavator construction. A comprehensive optimal trajectory planning method is proposed to optimize the working time, energy consumption, and operational impact of robotic excavators. Without fusing any performance indexes, a normalized multi-objective function and an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm are established to achieve a comprehensive optimization of multiple objectives, while considering joint angle, velocity, acceleration, and quadratic acceleration constraints. Typical deep pit excavation simulation and experimental results show that the multi-objective optimization method is feasible, can balance multi-objective constraints, and can avoid falling into extremely long working times or large impacts. This method offers a more efficient and effective solution for multi-objective trajectory planning and provides a method for planning excavation trajectories based on different operating scenarios and objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-objective optimization of facility planning for energy intensive companies
    Lei Yang
    Jochen Deuse
    Pingyu Jiang
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2013, 24 : 1095 - 1109
  • [22] ONLINE and multi-objective trajectory planner for robotic systems
    Habib Mohamad
    Sadjaad Ozgoli
    Discover Applied Sciences, 7 (1)
  • [23] Multi-objective trajectory planning for industrial robots using a hybrid optimization approach
    Chettibi, Taha
    ROBOTICA, 2024, 42 (06) : 2026 - 2045
  • [24] Computationally Adaptive Multi-Objective Trajectory Optimization for UAS with Variable Planning Deadlines
    Narayan, Pritesh
    Campbell, Duncan
    Walker, Rodney
    2009 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, 2009, : 3025 - 3032
  • [25] A Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization for Trajectory Planning of Fruit Picking Manipulator
    Cao, Xiaoman
    Yan, Hansheng
    Huang, Zhengyan
    Ai, Si
    Xu, Yongjun
    Fu, Renxuan
    Zou, Xiangjun
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [26] Multi-Objective Optimization for Online Train Trajectory Planning with Moving Window Method
    He, Zhiyu
    Li, Yinan
    Li, Hui
    Xu, Ning
    IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 2023, 50 (03)
  • [27] Multi-Objective A* Algorithm for the Multimodal Multi-Objective Path Planning Optimization
    Jin, Bo
    2021 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC 2021), 2021, : 1704 - 1711
  • [28] Constrained multi-objective optimization design of TriPower hydraulic excavator
    Xu G.
    Guo E.
    Feng Z.
    Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2022, 53 (07): : 2519 - 2532
  • [29] Multi-objective Performance Optimization of Robotic Mechanism
    Ying, Mingfeng
    Mo, Xiaohui
    Jiang, Jin
    2016 IEEE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, NETWORKING, ELECTRONIC AND AUTOMATION CONTROL CONFERENCE (ITNEC), 2016, : 459 - 463
  • [30] Multi-objective optimization technique for trajectory planning of multi-humanoid robots in cluttered terrain
    Kashyap, Abhishek Kumar
    Parhi, Dayal R.
    Pandey, Anish
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2022, 125 : 591 - 613