The Effect of Multisensory Distraction on Working Memory: A Role for Task Relevance?

被引:0
|
作者
Turoman, Nora [1 ,2 ]
Vergauwe, Evie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Dept Psychol, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, 40 Blvd Pont Arve, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
working memory; distraction; multisensory; task relevance; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; AUDITORY-VISUAL INTERACTIONS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL ATTENTION; AUDIOVISUAL INTEGRATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; SIMULTANEOUS STORAGE; OBJECT RECOGNITION; BRAIN-REGIONS;
D O I
10.1037/xlm0001323
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There is growing recognition that working memory and selective attention are highly related. However, a key function of selective attention-ignoring distractors-is much less understood in the domain of working memory. In the attention domain, it is now clear that distractors' task relevance and stimulation of multiple senses at a time (i.e., being multisensory), affect how much such information can distract from the main task, and that load modulates these effects. Here, we examined the effects of the task relevance and multisensory nature of distractors on working memory performance under high and low memory load, aiming to clarify whether distracting information similarly affects selective attention performance and working memory performance. We proposed a multiexperiment research plan involving up to three consecutive experiments, based on an initial online study (Experiment 0) with fully task-irrelevant distractors. There, we found conclusive evidence against a difference in how unisensory and multisensory distractors affected working memory performance. The next study, Experiment 1, replicated these results. However, when distractors were made partly task relevant in the subsequent Experiment 2d, multisensory distractors disrupted working memory performance more than unisensory distractors on average. However, closer nonpreregistered inspection revealed that multisensory distractors were actually only more disruptive than auditory distractors, and similarly as disruptive as visual distractors. Thus, overall, there was no strong evidence for multisensory distractors being more disruptive to working memory performance than unisensory distractors. Taken together, these experiments constitute a novel and detailed investigation of the impact of distracting information on working memory performance.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE EFFECT OF THE TASK TYPE FOR THE DISTRACTION EFFECT
    Naka, Sanae
    Katayama, Jun'ichi
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 53 : S83 - S83
  • [32] Opposing sequential biases in direction and time reproduction: Influences of task relevance and working memory
    Cheng, Si
    Chen, Siyi
    Shi, Zhuanghua
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [33] Distraction in Visual Working Memory: Resistance is Not Futile
    Lorenc, Elizabeth S.
    Mallett, Remington
    Lewis-Peacock, Jarrod A.
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (03) : 228 - 239
  • [34] Executive and Perceptual Distraction in Visual Working Memory
    Allen, Richard J.
    Baddeley, Alan D.
    Hitch, Graham J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2017, 43 (09) : 1677 - 1693
  • [35] The role of working memory for task-order coordination in dual-task situations
    Kuebler, Sebastian
    Strobach, Tilo
    Schubert, Torsten
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2022, 86 (02): : 452 - 473
  • [36] The role of working memory for task-order coordination in dual-task situations
    Sebastian Kübler
    Tilo Strobach
    Torsten Schubert
    Psychological Research, 2022, 86 : 452 - 473
  • [37] A test of interference versus decay in working memory: Varying distraction within lists in a complex span task
    Farrell, Simon
    Oberauer, Klaus
    Greaves, Martin
    Pasiecznik, Kazimir
    Lewandowsky, Stephan
    Jarrold, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2016, 90 : 66 - 87
  • [38] Why does working memory capacity predict RAPM performance? A possible role of distraction
    Jarosz, Andrew F.
    Wiley, Jennifer
    INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 40 (05) : 427 - 438
  • [39] Working memory in an editing task
    Hayes, John R.
    Chenoweth, N. Ann
    WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 2007, 24 (04) : 283 - 294
  • [40] The emotional startle effect is disrupted by a concurrent working memory task
    King, Rosemary
    Schaefer, Alexandre
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (02) : 269 - 272