Optimal Management of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Gasior, Sara A. [1 ]
O'Donnell, John P. M. [1 ,2 ]
Davey, Matthew [2 ,3 ]
Clarke, James [2 ]
Jalali, Amirhossein [4 ]
Ryan, Eanna [2 ]
Aherne, Thomas M. [3 ]
Walsh, Stewart R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Galway, Dept Vasc Surg, Galway, Ireland
[2] Natl Univ Ireland, Lambe Inst Translat Discipline Surg, Galway, Ireland
[3] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Dept Surg, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Math Sci, Cork, Ireland
关键词
Best medical treatment; Carotid artery disease; Carotid endarterectomy; Carotid stenting; Meta-analysis; MEDICAL-TREATMENT; ENDARTERECTOMY; RISK; STROKE; GUIDELINES; MICROEMBOLI; PREVENTION; STATEMENT; THERAPY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Management of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS), including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid artery stenting (CAS), and best medical treatment (BMT), remains inconsistent in current practice. Early studies reported a benefit of CEA vs. BMT; however, the current risk -benefit profile of invasive therapy lacks consensus. By evaluating the effects of modern BMT vs. invasive intervention on patient outcomes, this study aimed to influence the future management of ACAS.Methods: A systematic review and series of network meta-analyses were performed assessing peri-operative (within 30 days) and long term (30 days -5 years) stroke and mortality risk between ACAS interventions. Total stroke, major, minor, ipsilateral, and contralateral stroke subtypes were assessed independently. Traditional (pre-2000) and modern (post-2000) BMT were compared to assess clinical improvements in medical therapy over the previous two decades. Risks of myocardial infarction (MI) and cranial nerve injury (CNI) were also assessed.Results: Seventeen reports of 14 310 patients with > 50% ACAS were included. CEA reduced the odds of a peri-operative stroke event occurring vs. CAS (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 -2.2 [0 -20 fewer/1 000]). CEA and CAS reduced the long term odds of minor strokes (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21 -0.59 [20 fewer/1 000]) and ipsilateral strokes (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19 -0.39 [30 fewer/1 000]) vs. all BMT. CEA reduced the odds of major strokes and combined stroke and mortality vs. traditional BMT; however, no difference was found between CEA and modern BMT. CAS reduced the odds of peri-operative MI (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0. 26 -0.91) and CNI (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 -0.42) vs. CEA.Conclusion: Modern BMT demonstrates similar reductions in major stroke, combined stroke, and mortality to CEA. The overall risk reductions are low and data were unavailable to assess subgroups which may benefit from intervention. However, BMT carries the potential to reduce the requirement for surgical intervention in patients with ACAS.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 699
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    Feltner, Cynthia
    Amick, Halle R.
    Sheridan, Stacey
    Zheng, Zhi-Jie
    Watford, Daniel J.
    Carter, Jamie L.
    Rowe, Cassandra J.
    Harris, Russell
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 161 (05) : 336 - U151
  • [12] Treatment strategies for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the era of lipid-lowering drugs: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Bai, Xuesong
    Feng, Yao
    Li, Long
    Yang, Kun
    Wang, Tao
    Luo, Jichang
    Wang, Xue
    Ling, Feng
    Ma, Yan
    Jiao, Liqun
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07):
  • [13] Plaque Echolucency and Stroke Risk in Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gupta, Ajay
    Kesavabhotla, Kartik
    Baradaran, Hediyeh
    Kamel, Hooman
    Pandya, Ankur
    Giambrone, Ashley E.
    Wright, Drew
    Pain, Kevin J.
    Mtui, Edward E.
    Suri, Jasjit S.
    Sanelli, Pina C.
    Mushlin, Alvin I.
    STROKE, 2015, 46 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [14] Endarterectomy vs stenting for carotid artery stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Flynn, David N.
    Elamin, Mohamed B.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Hobson, Robert W.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Montori, Victor M.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 48 (02) : 487 - 493
  • [15] Systematic review and network meta-analysis of treatment strategies for asymptomatic carotid disease
    Barkat, Mohamed
    Roy, Iain
    Antoniou, Stavros A.
    Torella, Francesco
    Antoniou, George A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [16] Systematic review and network meta-analysis of treatment strategies for asymptomatic carotid disease
    Mohamed Barkat
    Iain Roy
    Stavros A. Antoniou
    Francesco Torella
    George A. Antoniou
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [17] Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis
    Benavente, O
    Moher, D
    Pham, B
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7171): : 1477 - 1480
  • [18] Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Artery Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Aggarwal, Ankita
    Whitler, Cameron
    Jain, Anubhav
    Patel, Harshil
    Zughaib, Marcel
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [19] Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy for Treatment of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis A Meta-Analysis Study
    Yuan, Guiyi
    Zhou, Shuxian
    Wu, Wei
    Zhang, Yuling
    Lei, Juan
    Huang, Boshui
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 59 (03) : 550 - 558
  • [20] Management for lumbar spinal stenosis: A network meta-analysis and systematic review
    Wei, Fei-Long
    Zhou, Cheng-Pei
    Liu, Rui
    Zhu, Kai-Long
    Du, Ming-Rui
    Gao, Hao-Ran
    Wu, Sheng-Da
    Sun, Li-Li
    Yan, Xiao-Dong
    Liu, Ya
    Qian, Ji-Xian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 85 : 19 - 28