Electric bicycles (e-bikes) are an increasingly common pediatric public health problem

被引:4
|
作者
Goodman, Laura F. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Flyer, Zoe Birnbaum [2 ]
Schomberg, John [3 ,4 ]
Maginas, Mary [3 ]
Wallace, Elizabeth [4 ]
Vukcevich, Olivia [5 ]
Awan, Saeed [1 ,2 ]
Gibbs, David [1 ,2 ]
Nahmias, Jeffry [1 ,6 ]
Guner, Yigit S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Surg, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Orange Cty, Div Pediat Surg, Orange, CA USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Orange Cty, Dept Nursing, Orange, CA USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Orange Cty, CHOC Res Inst, Orange, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Riverside, Sch Med, Riverside, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif Irvine, Div Trauma Burns Crit Care & Acute Care Surg, Orange, CA USA
[7] CHOC Dept Pediat Surg, 505 S Main St Ste 225, Orange, CA 92868 USA
关键词
Bicycle trauma; Pediatric injury; Electric bicycles; E-bike; Motorized bicycle;
D O I
10.1016/j.sopen.2023.06.004
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Electric bicycles (e-bikes) achieve higher speeds than pedal bicycles, but few studies have investigated the impact on injury rates specific to the pediatric population. Utilizing the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), we compared rates of pediatric injury for e-bikes, bicycles, and gas-engine bicycles (mopeds) from 2011 to 2020.Methods: Descriptive and bivariate inferential analyses were performed upon NEISS estimates of e-bike, bicycle, and moped injuries in children aged 2-18 years. Analyses were stratified by patient age and helmet usage. The Mann-Kendall test of trends was used.Results: We identified 3945 e-bike, 23,389 moped, and 2.05 million bicycle injuries. Over time, the incidence of in -jury increased for e-bikes (Kendall's & tau;=0.73, p = 0.004), decreased for pedal bicycles (Kendall's & tau;= - 0.91, p = 0.0003), and did not change for mopeds (Kendall's & tau; = 0.06, p = 0.85). Males accounted for 82.5% of e-bike injuries. The age group most commonly affected by e-bike injury (44.3 %) was 10-13 years old. The proportion of injuries requiring hospitalization was significantly higher for e-bikes (11.5 %), compared to moped and bicycle (7.0 and 4.8 %, respectively, p < 0.0001). In cases where helmet use or absence was reported, 97.3 % of e-bike riders were without a helmet at the time of injury, compared to 82.1 % of pedal bicycle riders and 87.2 % of moped riders.Conclusions: The rate of pediatric e-bike injuries increased over the study period. Compared to riders on pedal bicy-cles or mopeds, children on e-bikes had infrequent helmet use and increased rate of hospitalization. These findings suggest that attention to e-bike safety and increasing helmet usage are important to public health among the pedi-atric population. Level of evidence: IV. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 51
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Are the e-bikes more dangerous than traditional bicycles?
    Gogola, Marian
    2018 XI INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE-TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY, 2018,
  • [2] A push for public health: the effect of e-bikes on physical activity levels
    Sundfor, Hanne Beate
    Fyhri, Aslak
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 17
  • [3] A push for public health: the effect of e-bikes on physical activity levels
    Hanne Beate Sundfør
    Aslak Fyhri
    BMC Public Health, 17
  • [4] Safety of e-bikes compared to conventional bicycles: What role does cyclists ' health condition play?
    Schepers, Paul
    Wolt, Karin Klein
    Helbich, Marco
    Fishman, Elliot
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2020, 19
  • [5] Investigating conflict behaviours and characteristics in shared space for pedestrians, conventional bicycles and e-bikes
    Liang, Xinyu
    Meng, Xianghai
    Zheng, Lai
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2021, 158
  • [6] Drive Systems for Micromobility from E-bikes to Light Electric Vehicles
    Schleich, Michael
    Valtingoier, Ingo
    Heichele, Andreas
    ATZ worldwide, 2023, 125 (09) : 38 - 43
  • [7] The German Naturalistic Cycling Study - Comparing cycling speed of riders of different e-bikes and conventional bicycles
    Schleinitz, K.
    Petzoldt, T.
    Franke-Bartholdt, L.
    Krems, J.
    Gehlert, T.
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 92 : 290 - 297
  • [8] Drivers' gap acceptance and time to arrival judgements when confronted with approaching bicycles, e-bikes, and scooters
    Schleinitz, Katja
    Petzoldt, Tibor
    Gehlert, Tina
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2020, 12 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [9] Relationship between shared micromobility and public transit: The differences between shared bikes and shared E-bikes
    Kong, Hui
    Chao, Hao
    Fu, Wenyan
    Lin, Diao
    Zhang, Yongping
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2025, 123
  • [10] Risk-benefit perceptions and public acceptance of hydrogen e-bikes
    Wang, Jin-Wei
    Li, Jiaojiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2025, 100 : 905 - 914