Seismic design and performance analysis of bridge bents retrofitted with multistage buckling-restrained braces

被引:3
|
作者
Shi, Yan [1 ]
Zhang, Zhichao [1 ]
Fan, Xiangxin [1 ]
Han, Jianping [1 ]
Qin, Hongguo [1 ]
Sun, Zhiguo [2 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[2] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Disaster Prevent, Key Lab Bldg Collapse Mech & Disaster Prevent, Beijing 101601, Peoples R China
关键词
Bridge bents; Structural fuse; Multistage buckling-restrained brace; Yield displacement; Elastic stiffnesses; DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.01.140
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) are often used to retrofit RC bridge bents to increase their strength and stiffness, and dissipate the seismic energy through hysteretic behavior. However, the post-yielding stiffness of BRBs is very low, and the total stiffness of the retrofitted bent drops sharply when the brace yields, which can lead to more serious damage to the primary structure contrary to the design purpose. Accordingly, multistage buckling-restrained braces (MSBRBs), consisting of steel cores with different yield strains, were used for the seismic retrofitting of bridge bents in this study. By controlling the low yield point (LYP) core yield before the bridge bents and high yield point (HYP) core yield after the bents, the expressions for the steel core length related to the geometric parameters of the bridge bents were derived. Furthermore, a preliminary seismic design method based on the structural fuse concept was proposed, which realized that the MSBRB dissipates energy while providing stable stiffness to improve the safety of the entire system. The advantages of the MSBRB in controlling the peak and residual displacement of the RC bent were proved via nonlinear time history analyses. Finally, the effects of the stiffness ratios, yield displacement ratios, and different configurations on the seismic performance of retrofitting bridge bents with MSBRBs were examined. The results showed that seismic performance of reinforced bents can be improved by increasing the stiffness ratio appropriately. The LYP core is primarily related to the energy dissipation capacity of the MSBRBs, and the value of beta L should be less than 0.5. The HYP core is largely responsible for controlling the deformation of bridge bent, and beta H must be greater than 1.0. Compared to other configurations, the diagonal MSBRB system has a greater energy dissipation capacity and higher seismic reduction rate.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:779 / 791
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Application of buckling-restrained braces in the seismic control of suspension bridges
    Long Lu
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2022, 21 : 543 - 557
  • [32] Collapse capacity of reinforced concrete skewed bridges retrofitted with buckling-restrained braces
    Wang, Yuandong
    Ibarra, Luis
    Pantelides, Chris
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 184 : 99 - 114
  • [33] SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF FIXED STEEL JACKET PLATFORMS RETROFITTED WITH BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES
    El-Din, Mohamed Nour
    Kim, JinKoo
    OMAE2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, VOL 2: STRUCTURES, SAFETY AND RELIABILITY, 2011, : 135 - +
  • [34] Analysis on damage of RC frames retrofitted with buckling-restrained braces based on estimation of damage index
    Liu, Ruyue
    Yang, Yong
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2019, 70 (06) : 781 - 791
  • [35] Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces
    Black, CJ
    Makris, N
    Aiken, ID
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (06) : 880 - 894
  • [36] Experimental tests of a real building seismically retrofitted by special Buckling-Restrained Braces
    D'Aniello, Mario
    Della Corte, Gaetano
    Mazzolani, Federico A.
    2008 SEISMIC ENGINEERING CONFERENCE COMMEMORATING THE 1908 MESSINA AND REGGIO CALABRIA EARTHQUAKE, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 1020 : 1513 - 1520
  • [37] Application of buckling-restrained braces in the seismic control of suspension bridges
    Long Lu
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2022, (02) : 543 - 557
  • [38] Performance tests and analysis of structural aluminum alloy buckling-restrained braces
    Sato T.
    Usami T.
    Kurata M.
    Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A, 2010, 66 (02) : 356 - 367
  • [39] RESTRAINED BUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF CORE COMPONENT IN BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACES
    Wu, J.
    Liang, R. J.
    Wang, C. L.
    Ge, H. B.
    ADVANCED STEEL CONSTRUCTION, 2012, 8 (03): : 212 - 225
  • [40] Equivalent Energy-based Design Method of Bridge Bents with Multistage Buckling–Restrained Brace
    Qin H.
    Pei Y.
    Fan X.
    Li P.
    Shi Y.
    Gongcheng Kexue Yu Jishu/Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2024, 56 (02): : 246 - 256