Sustainable crop production: Highlights on economic, environmental and social life cycle thinking

被引:1
|
作者
Taoumi, Hamza [1 ]
Elouahbi, Karim [1 ]
Adnane, Imane [1 ]
Lahrech, Khadija [2 ]
机构
[1] Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah Univ USMBA, IPI Lab, ENS, Fes, Morocco
[2] Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah Univ USMBA, ENSA, Fes, Morocco
关键词
Socio-eco-effectiveness; Socio-eco-efficiency; Sustainability; agriculture; Life cycle; Modelling; USE EFFICIENCY; ENERGY; SYSTEMS; IMPACTS; FERTILIZER; FOOTPRINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170267
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Seeking multi -dimensional inclusion is one of the most global concerns of the crop production sector worldwide. Socio-eco-effectiveness or socio-eco-efficiency optimization plays a crucial role in future strategy establishment. Life cycle is a widely used approach examining economic, environmental, and social impacts. Recently, life cycle thinking approaches have been increasingly utilized to bring to light useful perceptions of the crop production processes. This study aims to apply a systematic review and prescriptive analytics to critically investigate the life cycle thinking approaches application according to sustainability pyramid aspects, life cycle thinking unicity, goal and scope variability, functional units' causality, system boundary' diversity, involved aspect' concentration, indicators, impacts categories and influencing variables distribution, as well as to define a first datasheet model and directive axis to apply per aspect and family for socio-eco-effectiveness or socio-eco-efficiency evaluation. Over 295 peer-reviewed studies from 2019 to the middle of 2023, 52 reviews and articles gathered from Web of Science and Scopus meet the criteria to be analyzed. Our inspection revealed that related reviews are few, approximately 2 %. Moving from the traditional life cycle perspective to the sustainability pyramid approach, the indicators applied by researchers were classified per aspect and family belonging. A deductive analysis was carried out to narrow the impact categories, and the influencing factors to the population's main interests: four economic (input status, resources consumption, waste, and Costs of Life Cycle), eight environmental (Climate Change, Global Warming, Ozone, Acidification, Eutrophication, Photochemical Oxidation, Abiotic Depletion, and Toxicity), and three social families (Human Toxicity, employment, and Ionizing Radiation). The results combination highlights the construction need for a directive datasheet model to address the optimizing problem under the identified families and aspects constraints, as well as to envisage the units and methods worldwide standardization's necessity for spatial -temporal studies comparison in the present, the past, and the future.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Progress towards Sustainable Production: Environmental, Economic, and Social Assessments of the Cellulose Nanofiber Production Process
    Moon, Dami
    Sagisaka, Masayuki
    Tahara, Kiyotaka
    Tsukahara, Kenichiro
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (12)
  • [22] Economic, environmental, and social assessment of bioethanol production using multiple coffee crop residues
    Duarte, Alexandra
    Carlos Uribe, Juan
    Sarache, William
    Calderon, Andres
    ENERGY, 2021, 216
  • [23] Integrated economic and environmental (Life cycle) optimisation of carbon nanotube paper production
    Weil, M. R.
    Forero, S.
    Crizeli, S.
    Michl, F.
    Buchgeister, Jens
    NANOFAIR 2008: NEW IDEAS FOR INDUSTRY, 2008, 2027 : 117 - 122
  • [24] The life cycle of social and economic systems
    Sardak, S. E.
    MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS, 2016, (01): : 157 - 169
  • [25] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review
    Ahmed I. Osman
    Bingbing Fang
    Yubing Zhang
    Yunfei Liu
    Jiacheng Yu
    Mohamed Farghali
    Ahmed K. Rashwan
    Zhonghao Chen
    Lin Chen
    Ikko Ihara
    David W. Rooney
    Pow-Seng Yap
    Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2024, 22 : 1115 - 1154
  • [26] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review
    Osman, Ahmed I.
    Fang, Bingbing
    Zhang, Yubing
    Liu, Yunfei
    Yu, Jiacheng
    Farghali, Mohamed
    Rashwan, Ahmed K.
    Chen, Zhonghao
    Chen, Lin
    Ihara, Ikko
    Rooney, David W.
    Yap, Pow-Seng
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2024, 22 (03) : 1115 - 1154
  • [27] How sustainable are the biodegradable medical gowns via environmental and social life cycle assessment?
    Zhao, Xiang
    Klemes, Jiri Jaromir
    Saxon, Michael
    You, Fengqi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 380
  • [28] The Econo-Environmental Return (EER) -: A link between environmental impacts and economic aspects in a life cycle thinking perspective
    Bage, GF
    Samson, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (04): : 246 - 251
  • [29] The Econo-Environmental Return (EER)A Link between Environmental Impacts and Economic Aspects in a Life Cycle Thinking Perspective
    Gontran F. Bage
    Réjean Samson
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2003, 8 : 246 - 251
  • [30] Application of life cycle thinking towards sustainable cities: A review
    Petit-Boix, Anna
    Llorach-Massana, Pere
    Sanjuan-Delmas, David
    Sierra-Perez, Jorge
    Vinyes, Elisabet
    Gabarrell, Xavier
    Rieradevall, Joan
    Sanye-Mengual, Esther
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 : 939 - 951