Sustainable crop production: Highlights on economic, environmental and social life cycle thinking

被引:1
|
作者
Taoumi, Hamza [1 ]
Elouahbi, Karim [1 ]
Adnane, Imane [1 ]
Lahrech, Khadija [2 ]
机构
[1] Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah Univ USMBA, IPI Lab, ENS, Fes, Morocco
[2] Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah Univ USMBA, ENSA, Fes, Morocco
关键词
Socio-eco-effectiveness; Socio-eco-efficiency; Sustainability; agriculture; Life cycle; Modelling; USE EFFICIENCY; ENERGY; SYSTEMS; IMPACTS; FERTILIZER; FOOTPRINT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170267
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Seeking multi -dimensional inclusion is one of the most global concerns of the crop production sector worldwide. Socio-eco-effectiveness or socio-eco-efficiency optimization plays a crucial role in future strategy establishment. Life cycle is a widely used approach examining economic, environmental, and social impacts. Recently, life cycle thinking approaches have been increasingly utilized to bring to light useful perceptions of the crop production processes. This study aims to apply a systematic review and prescriptive analytics to critically investigate the life cycle thinking approaches application according to sustainability pyramid aspects, life cycle thinking unicity, goal and scope variability, functional units' causality, system boundary' diversity, involved aspect' concentration, indicators, impacts categories and influencing variables distribution, as well as to define a first datasheet model and directive axis to apply per aspect and family for socio-eco-effectiveness or socio-eco-efficiency evaluation. Over 295 peer-reviewed studies from 2019 to the middle of 2023, 52 reviews and articles gathered from Web of Science and Scopus meet the criteria to be analyzed. Our inspection revealed that related reviews are few, approximately 2 %. Moving from the traditional life cycle perspective to the sustainability pyramid approach, the indicators applied by researchers were classified per aspect and family belonging. A deductive analysis was carried out to narrow the impact categories, and the influencing factors to the population's main interests: four economic (input status, resources consumption, waste, and Costs of Life Cycle), eight environmental (Climate Change, Global Warming, Ozone, Acidification, Eutrophication, Photochemical Oxidation, Abiotic Depletion, and Toxicity), and three social families (Human Toxicity, employment, and Ionizing Radiation). The results combination highlights the construction need for a directive datasheet model to address the optimizing problem under the identified families and aspects constraints, as well as to envisage the units and methods worldwide standardization's necessity for spatial -temporal studies comparison in the present, the past, and the future.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainable Peach Compote Production: A Life Cycle Thinking Approach
    Nanaki, Evanthia A.
    Koroneos, Christopher J.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (11)
  • [2] Life cycle thinking: towards the sustainable management of resources in aluminium production
    Ch. Achillas
    Ch. Vlachokostas
    C. Koroneos
    Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, 2020, 5
  • [3] Life cycle thinking: towards the sustainable management of resources in aluminium production
    Achillas, Ch.
    Vlachokostas, Ch.
    Koroneos, C.
    EURO-MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRATION, 2020, 5 (01)
  • [4] Promoting sustainable potato production - Insights from an integrated life cycle environmental-economic assessment
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Li, Changting
    Wang, Shuo
    Cheng, Ziyue
    Li, Ziheng
    Xu, Tianshu
    Zhou, Xinying
    Chen, Wei
    Hong, Jinglan
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 219
  • [5] Life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of arable crop production
    Brentrup, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (03): : 156 - 156
  • [6] Life cycle thinking of plasma gasification as a waste-to-energy tool: Review on environmental, economic and social aspects
    Ramos, Ana
    Rouboa, Abel
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 153
  • [7] Life Cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of arable crop production
    Frank Brentrup
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2003, 8 : 156 - 156
  • [8] Life Cycle Thinking a Sustainable Built Environment
    Manni, Mattia
    Cotana, Franco
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (10)
  • [9] Sustainable Design and Operation of Cellulosic Bioelectricity Supply Chain Networks with Life Cycle Economic, Environmental, and Social Optimization
    Yue, Dajun
    Slivinsky, Maxim
    Sumpter, Jason
    You, Fengqi
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2014, 53 (10) : 4008 - 4029
  • [10] Life Cycle Assessment: A Tool for Determining the Environmental Impact of Horticultural Crop Production
    Ingram, Dewayne L.
    Fernandez, R. Thomas
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 22 (03) : 275 - 279