Peer-reviewed publications in orthopaedic surgery from lower income countries: A comparative analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Sabharwal, Sanjeev [1 ,2 ]
Leung, Andrea [1 ]
Rodarte, Patricia [2 ]
Singh, Gurbinder [1 ]
Bwemelo, Joel Johansen [3 ]
Taylor, Annelise S. [1 ]
Tan, Josephine [1 ]
Trott, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] UCSF Benioff Childrens Hosp Oakland, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 747 52nd St, Oakland, CA 94609 USA
[2] Inst Global Orthopaed & Traumatol IGOT, 2540 23rd St,Bldg 7, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[3] Muhimbili Orthopaed Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Kalenga St, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
来源
SICOT-J | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
Peer-reviewed publications; Low and middle income country; LMIC authors; Bibliometric study; PARTNERSHIPS; INJURIES;
D O I
10.1051/sicotj/2023039
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Musculoskeletal (MSK) disease is a substantial global burden, especially in lower income countries. However, limited research has been published on MSK health by scholars from these countries. We aimed to study the distribution of authorships, including trends in peer-reviewed orthopaedic publications based on each author's affiliated institution's country income status. Methods: Based on a bibliometric search, 119 orthopaedic-related journals were identified using the Journal Citation Reports database. Details of all scientific articles published in these journals between 2012 and 2021 were used to study trends and association between each of the author's affiliated institution's country income status, using the World Bank Classification. Results: Of the 133,718 unique articles, 87.6% had at least one author affiliation from a high-income country (HIC), 7.0% from an upper-middle income country (UMIC), 5.2% from a lower-middle income country (LMIC), and 0.2% from a low-income country (LIC). Overall, these articles were cited 1,825,365 times, with 92.5% of citations from HIC-affiliated authors and < 0.1% from LIC-affiliated authors. Over the 10-year study period, HIC-affiliated articles demonstrated the largest increase in the number of publications (9107-14,619), compared to UMIC-affiliated (495-1214), LMIC-affiliated (406-874), and LIC-affiliated articles (4-28). Conclusions: There are large and persistent disparities in orthopaedic research publications based on the country income status of the author's affiliated institution, especially in the higher impact orthopaedic journals. Efforts should be made to increase opportunities for scholars from LICs and LMICs to publish their research in high-impact orthopaedic journals.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Self-Presentation in academia today: From peer-reviewed publications to social media
    Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gan, Israel
    不详
    不详
    IN, United States
    不详
    Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1 (1-4):
  • [42] VALUE AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: TRANSPARENCY IN USE OF PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS
    van den Broek, R.
    Desai, B.
    Mattingly, T. J.
    Perfetto, E. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S796 - S796
  • [43] Latin American Legislative Politics: A Survey of Peer-Reviewed Publications in English
    Aleman, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS IN LATIN AMERICA, 2013, 5 (01) : 15 - 36
  • [44] Sharing chemical structures with peer-reviewed publications. Are we there yet?
    Williams, Antony
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255
  • [45] Discrepancies Between Peer-Reviewed Publications and Clinical Trial Registries in Ophthalmology
    Sun, Lynn W.
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Collins, Jamie A.
    Carll, Timothy C.
    Ramahi, Khalid
    Sandy, Scott J.
    Unteriner, Jackson G.
    Weinberg, David V.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [46] Orthopaedic Surgery Subspecialty Podcast Effectively Disseminates Peer-reviewed Articles Relative to Traditional Online Publishing
    Paulson, Ambika E.
    Clement, Rutledge Carter
    Holt, Joshua B.
    Sanders, Julia S.
    Louer Jr, Craig R.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 44 (03) : e292 - e297
  • [47] An innovative approach to peer-reviewed publications in the digital era: a case study
    Roberts, Katherine
    Fonseca, Patricia
    Lindquist, Christine
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2020, 36 : 11 - 12
  • [48] Assessment of Consistency Between Peer-Reviewed Publications and Clinical Trial Registries
    Sun, Lynn W.
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Collins, Jamie A.
    Carll, Timothy C.
    Ramahi, Khalid
    Sandy, Scott J.
    Unteriner, Jackson G.
    Weinberg, David V.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 137 (05) : 552 - 556
  • [49] Peer-reviewed publications: do physicians still actually read them?
    Thompson, Michael
    Davey, Kieran
    Torbica, Tanja
    Robinson, Hollie
    Nunn, Jane
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2018, 34 : 24 - 25
  • [50] Peer-reviewed publications in the era of social media-JHM 2.0
    Greysen, S. Ryan
    Arora, Vineet M.
    Auerbach, Andrew D.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2014, 9 (04) : 269 - 270