Techno-economic analysis of combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system integrated with multiple renewable energy sources and energy storage units

被引:61
|
作者
Assareh, Ehsanolah [1 ]
Dejdar, Ali [3 ]
Ershadi, Ali [2 ]
Jafarian, Masoud [2 ]
Mansouri, Mohammadhossein [2 ]
Roshani, Amir Salek [2 ]
Azish, Ehsan [2 ]
Saedpanah, Ehsan [4 ]
Lee, Moonyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Yeungnam Univ, Sch Chem Engn, Gyongsan 38541, South Korea
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Dezful Branch, Dezful, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Dezful Branch, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Dezful, Iran
[4] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Mech Engn, POB 14115-143, Tehran, Iran
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Dynamic simulation; Response surface method; Techno-economic analysis; TRNSYS; Electricity generation; RESPONSE-SURFACE METHODOLOGY; PUMP SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; WATER; DESIGN; RSM; HOT; SIMULATION; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112618
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study presents the optimal design of a multi-source renewable energy combined cooling, heating, and power (M-RCCHP) system integrated with energy storage units for an apartment community from techno-economic perspectives using response surface methodology (RSM) and dynamic evaluation. The proposed M-RCCHP system is consisted of photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) collectors, wind turbines (WTs), fuel cell subsystem, heat pump (HP), while the battery banks and hydrogen storage tank are the energy storage subsystems. The behavior of the system is examined by a dynamic approach using the TRNSYS simulation platform. Besides, the main design variables of the M-RCCHP system are selected to find the foremost combination of them using the design of experiments (DOE) technique. The number of PV/T panels, number of WT, fuel cell power, HP cooling capacity and HP heating capacity were considered as decision variables. Overall electricity consumption (OEC) and boiler fuel consumption (BFC) as indica-tors of primary energy consumption of the system and predicted average vote (PMV) as an index of ther-mal comfort of the system and life cycle cost (LCC) as economic criteria as 4 objective functions were selected for optimization. The optimization results showed that the M-RCCHP system with 225 PV/T col-lectors, 15 wt, fuel cells with a power of 74.96 kW, HP cooling capacity of 50.25 kW and HP heating capac-ity of 20 kW achieved the best techno-economic performance during the period. The results of the system modeling showed that the fuel cell subsystem, PV/T collectors and WTs with the maximum power of 75 kW, 52 kW and 24 kW have the largest contribution in electricity production. The optimization results showed that the system cycle cost (LCC) is 323,004.96 $ per year, the system comfort coefficient (PMV) is 0.115 per year, the boiler fuel consumption is 41,067.88 cubic meters per year, and the total electricity consumption is -317,194.94 kWh per year, as well as the amount The optimal cooling and heating capac-ities of HP were calculated as 50.25 and 20 kW, respectively. And finally, the error percentage of the opti-mization method was reported as 6.53 %.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Techno-economic analysis of energy storage integration combined with SCUC and STATCOM to improve power system stability
    Kumbhar, Nileshkumar J.
    Jadhav, H. T.
    ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 106 (06) : 6953 - 6971
  • [22] Techno-economic analysis of hybrid renewable energy system with solar district heating for net zero energy community
    Kim, Min-Hwi
    Kim, Deukwon
    Heo, Jaehyeok
    Lee, Dong-Won
    ENERGY, 2019, 187
  • [23] Energy matching and optimization analysis of waste to energy CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power) system with exergy and energy level
    Gao, Penghui
    Dai, Yanjun
    Tong, YenWah
    Dong, Pengwei
    ENERGY, 2015, 79 : 522 - 535
  • [24] Thermodynamic analysis of heat driven Combined Cooling Heating and Power system (CCHP) with energy storage for long distance transmission
    Han, Bing-Chuan
    Cheng, Wen-Long
    Li, Yi-Yi
    Nian, Yong-Le
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 154 : 102 - 117
  • [25] Techno-economic analysis of renewable energy source options for a district heating project
    Ghafghazi, S.
    Sowlati, T.
    Sokhansanj, S.
    Melin, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2010, 34 (12) : 1109 - 1120
  • [26] Gravity Energy Storage: A Review on System Types, Techno-Economic Assessment and Integration With Renewable Energy
    Cai, Kun
    Han, Yifeng
    Xia, Rui
    Wu, Jinming
    Wang, Jun
    Lund, Peter D.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [27] Techno-Economic Analysis and Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy System with Energy Storage under Two Operational Modes
    Agajie, Takele Ferede
    Fopah-Lele, Armand
    Amoussou, Isaac
    Ali, Ahmed
    Khan, Baseem
    Mahela, Om Prakash
    Nuvvula, Ramakrishna S. S.
    Ngwashi, Divine Khan
    Flores, Emmanuel Soriano
    Tanyi, Emmanuel
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [28] Techno-economic assessment of hybrid renewable energy system with multi energy storage system using HOMER
    Yadav, Subhash
    Kumar, Pradeep
    Kumar, Ashwani
    ENERGY, 2024, 297
  • [29] Techno-economic analysis of thermochemical-integrated pumped thermal energy storage system
    Hu, Yang
    Yao, Erren
    Zhong, Like
    Wu, Shuhong
    Zou, Hansen
    Xi, Guang
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 104
  • [30] Techno-Economic Comparison of Electricity Storage Options in a Fully Renewable Energy System
    Mulder, Sebastiaan
    Klein, Sikke
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (05)