Constraining the Sense of Agency in Human-Machine Interaction

被引:1
|
作者
Zanatto, Debora [1 ,3 ]
Bifani, Simone [2 ,4 ]
Noyes, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Fac Engn, Bristol, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Phys & Astron, Birmingham, England
[3] Deep Blue Srl, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[4] Intellera Consulting Spa, I-00154 Rome, Italy
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Sense of agency; intentional binding; decision constraints; human-machine interaction; intentional action; EXPERIENCE; INFERENCE; AWARENESS; VOLITION; TESTS;
D O I
10.1080/10447318.2023.2189815
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
One of the most significant issues in Human-Machine Interaction relates to how much autonomy delegates to automation and whether this could degrade the human perception of control, referred to as Sense of Agency. In this study, the What-Whether-When model of intentional action was used to look for variations in the Sense of Agency by measuring the Intentional Binding effect when the human is told either what action to perform or whether to act or when to act. Participants were asked to reproduce the time interval between a keypress and an acoustic tone (delivered at different time intervals). In Experiment 1, this action could be entirely voluntary or fully constrained by the computer. In Experiment 2, the computer constrained only one decision component at a time (either what, whether, or when). Experiment 1 indicates that Intentional Binding is increased for voluntary actions. Results from Experiment 2 suggest that selecting what to do, whether, and when to act have different effects, with the Sense of Agency being degraded when participants were told what action to perform and whether to act. Further, results show the presence of a specific window of opportunity needed for the Sense of Agency to develop for each constraint.
引用
收藏
页码:3482 / 3493
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Handling knowledge sources in human-machine interaction
    Minker W.
    Néel F.
    [J]. International Journal of Speech Technology, 2002, 5 (02) : 171 - 188
  • [32] Towards individualized affective human-machine interaction
    Kumagai, Kazumi
    Mizuuchi, Ikuo
    Lingheng, Meng
    Blidaru, Alexandru
    Beesley, Philip
    Kulic, Dana
    [J]. 2018 27TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (IEEE RO-MAN 2018), 2018, : 678 - 685
  • [33] Human-Machine Interaction, Methods and International Standards
    Serritiello, Dora
    [J]. IEEE INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENT MAGAZINE, 2019, 22 (01) : 33 - +
  • [34] Neuronal correlates of emotions in human-machine interaction
    Benjamin Blankertz
    Klaus-Robert Müller
    Gabriel Curio
    [J]. BMC Neuroscience, 10 (Suppl 1)
  • [35] Artificial emotional creature for human-machine interaction
    Shibata, T
    Yoshida, M
    Yamato, J
    [J]. SMC '97 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS - 1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5: CONFERENCE THEME: COMPUTATIONAL CYBERNETICS AND SIMULATION, 1997, : 2269 - 2274
  • [36] Human-Machine Interaction in Ubiquitous Application Design
    Koo, Simon G. M.
    [J]. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2010), 2010, : 3725 - 3729
  • [37] ArTbitration:: Human-machine interaction in artistic domains
    Mornoi, A
    Zuben, FV
    Manzolli, J
    [J]. LEONARDO, 2002, 35 (02) : 185 - 188
  • [38] Human-Machine Interaction Based on Augmented Reality
    Pozsegovics, Peter
    Vamossy, Zoltan
    [J]. 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (CINTI), 2013, : 153 - 158
  • [39] Bioprosthesis Control: Human-Machine Interaction Problem
    Wolczowski, Andrzej
    Suchodolski, Tomasz
    [J]. CHALLENGES FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 20 : 558 - 560
  • [40] A New Human-Machine Interaction of Smart Plants
    Huang, Wen-Bin
    Chang, Shuo-Wen
    Xie, Mei-Yun
    Yen, Chu-Rong
    Horng, Mong-Fong
    [J]. INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (ICS 2014), 2015, 274 : 631 - 640