Economic growth, institutional quality and deforestation: Evidence from Russia

被引:11
|
作者
Sohag, Kazi [1 ]
Gainetdinova, Anna [1 ]
Mariev, Oleg [1 ]
机构
[1] Ural Fed Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, Ekaterinburg, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Deforestation; Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC); Institutional quality; Russian regions; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; AVOIDED DEFORESTATION; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; FOREST TRANSITION; TRADE; CORRUPTION; DRIVERS; POLICIES; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102949
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Forestry reserves have a crucial role in preserving ecosystems and global climate regulation, and Russia boasts the largest forested area in the world. Economic development entails various challenges for the environment, including a lack of forestry legislation or compliance, poor governance and unrestrained privatisation. This study investigates the role of institutional quality in explaining deforestation using panel-time series data for 75 Russian regions from 2009 to 2019. We apply a one-way autoregressive fixed-effect model with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors due to spatial dependence and time lags across Russian regions. The findings affirm the hy-pothesis of the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation, implying that after surpassing a threshold point of gross regional product per capita, deforestation decreases. Poor institutional quality significantly increases the deforestation rate, which remains robust when considering the timber harvesting volume. The results affirm our proposition that the Russian forestry preservation policy is somewhat effective in reducing the deforestation rate. The empirical findings reinforce the importance of improving institutional quality for preserving forest areas toward carbon sequestration and overall Sustainable Development Goal agendas.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Equity, Bonds, Institutional Debt and Economic Growth: Evidence from South Africa
    Fanta, Ashenafi Beyene
    Makina, Daniel
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2017, 85 (01) : 86 - 97
  • [32] The Impact of Institutional Friction Cost on Economic Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries
    Zhou, Qingjie
    Yu, Dongyao
    Xu, Feng
    Sun, Jiamin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [33] Institutional Change and Economic Growth: Evidence from China, 1978-2008
    Zhao, Shiyong
    Zhao, Shifeng
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC WORKSHOP ON SOCIAL SCIENCE (IAW-SC 2013), 2013, 50 : 93 - 97
  • [34] Do Institutional Quality, Financial Development, and Economic Growth Improve Renewable Energy Transition? Some Evidence from Tunisia
    Haifa Saadaoui
    Nouri Chtourou
    [J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2023, 14 : 2927 - 2958
  • [35] Do Institutional Quality, Financial Development, and Economic Growth Improve Renewable Energy Transition? Some Evidence from Tunisia
    Saadaoui, Haifa
    Chtourou, Nouri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2023, 14 (03) : 2927 - 2958
  • [36] U-shaped impacts of institutional quality and ICT penetration on economic growth: Evidence from selected emerging countries
    Thanh Phuc Nguyen
    Thi Thu Hong Dinh
    Ngoc Tho Tran
    Trang Duong Thi Thuy
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [37] Is higher economic growth possible through better institutional quality and a lower carbon footprint? Evidence from developing countries
    Nair, Mahendhiran
    Arvin, Mak B.
    Pradhan, Rudra P.
    Bahmani, Sahar
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 167 : 132 - 145
  • [38] Does Bank Liquidity Creation Contribute to Economic Growth? Evidence from Russia
    Fidrmuc, Jarko
    Fungacova, Zuzana
    Weill, Laurent
    [J]. OPEN ECONOMIES REVIEW, 2015, 26 (03) : 479 - 496
  • [39] Tax revenues, public investments and economic growth rates: evidence from Russia
    Belov, Andrey V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TAX REFORM, 2018, 4 (01): : 45 - 56
  • [40] Does Bank Liquidity Creation Contribute to Economic Growth? Evidence from Russia
    Jarko Fidrmuc
    Zuzana Fungáčová
    Laurent Weill
    [J]. Open Economies Review, 2015, 26 : 479 - 496