Philosophical and Anthropological Understanding of the Nature of Collective Violence

被引:0
|
作者
Kravchenko, V. Y. [1 ]
Koldunov, Y. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dnipro State Med Univ, Dnipro, Ukraine
关键词
human nature; coercion; justification and rationalization of violence; values; dehumanization; suffering; dignity; domination; injustice; structural violence; collective violence; exploitation; POLITICAL VIOLENCE;
D O I
10.15802/ampr.v0i24.295314
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Purpose. The purpose of this research is to analyse and systematize modern philosophical and anthropological ideas about the nature, essence, causes and sources of collective violence. Theoretical basis. Given the complexity and multifaceted nature of the phenomenon of violence, the authors used a range of philosophical and general scientific research methods. In particular, the comparative method helped to identify the main advantages and disadvantages of using philosophical and anthropological approaches to studying the nature and patterns of violence in the social environment. The use of the systemic and structural-functional methods contributed to a better understanding of the structure, features, mechanisms and criteria for ethical justification of the permissibility of collective violence. The psychological approach made it possible to analyse the role of social dissatisfaction, disappointment, relative deprivation and frustration in the process of radicalization of individuals and their readiness to use violence. Originality. The originality of this research lies in the application of modern analytical approaches to the study and philosophical understanding of the phenomenon of violence. It has been proven that at the current stage of social development, the following non-traditional forms of violence are becoming widespread: structural, symbolic, cultural, and psychological. It has been established that the main sources of collective violence are value, cultural, ideological and structural contradictions, as well as socio-psychological dissatisfaction, economic inequality and discrimination. Conclusions. Throughout history, violence has been an integral part of spiritual, social, value and economic transformations. The study of such a complex phenomenon requires the creation of an effective interdisciplinary theory that would take into account various anthropological, social, philosophical, psychological, physiological and biological dimensions and forms of its use. That is why there is a need to further improve scientific theories and approaches to studying the nature, forms and sources of violence. Taking advantage of a comprehensive approach, we have been able to establish that violence is a form of social influence that involves the use of physical force against individuals, social groups or institutions to cause physical, mental or moral harm and to subordinate their behaviour and will.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 56
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PHILOSOPHICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL BASES OF THE DASEIN ANALYSIS
    Condrau, Gion
    HORIZON-FENOMENOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2016, 5 (02): : 315 - 427
  • [22] VIOLENCE AS "EXPERIENCE" AND VIOLENCE AS "HEARSAY": AN ANTHROPOLOGICAL DISCUSSION
    Di Bella, Maria Pia
    ACTA HISTRIAE, 2011, 19 (03): : 561 - 570
  • [23] A Philosophical -Anthropological Case for Cassirer, in Rhetoric
    Bengtson, Erik
    Rosengren, Mats
    RHETORICA-A JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF RHETORIC, 2017, 35 (03): : 346 - 365
  • [24] PHILOSOPHICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL VIEWS OF MAXIM GREK
    Gromov, M. N.
    VESTNIK SLAVIANSKIKH KULTUR-BULLETIN OF SLAVIC CULTURES-SCIENTIFIC AND INFORMATIONAL JOURNAL, 2010, (03): : 21 - 35
  • [25] A Linguistic and Philosophical Analysis of Anthropological Paradigms
    Stezhko, Yurii
    Drabovska, Vira
    Gusak, Liudmyla
    Koliada, Elina
    Derik, Ilona
    Hrushko, Svitlana
    POSTMODERN OPENINGS, 2021, 12 (01): : 287 - 301
  • [26] PERSONALITY: PHILOSOPHICAL-ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASPECT
    Milkov, Luchiyan
    FILOSOFIYA-PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 24 (04): : 421 - 435
  • [27] Collective Memory - collective Violence
    Mies, Thomas
    Bosse, Hans
    GRUPPENPSYCHOTHERAPIE UND GRUPPENDYNAMIK, 2011, 47 (04) : 231 - 234
  • [28] Why is collective violence collective?
    de la Roche, RS
    SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2001, 19 (02) : 126 - 144
  • [29] (Non)Violence of nature and violence to nature
    Leone, Ugo
    DOCUMENTI GEOGRAFICI, 2022, 2 : 541 - 551
  • [30] Violence and tolerance: An anthropological retrospective
    Nazaretyan, AP
    VOPROSY PSIKHOLOGII, 2005, (05) : 37 - +