Improving the usability and usefulness of computerized decision support systems for medication review by clinical pharmacists: A convergent, parallel evaluation

被引:3
|
作者
Marcilly, Romaric [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Colliaux, Jeremie [2 ]
Robert, Laurine [3 ]
Pelayo, Sylvia [1 ,2 ]
Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste [1 ,4 ]
Rousseliere, Chloe [3 ]
Decaudin, Bertrand [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 METRICS, Hlth Technol Assessment & Med Pract, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Inserm, CIC IT 1403, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] CHU Lille, Inst Pharm, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] CHU Lille, Geriatr Serv, F-59000 Lille, France
[5] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 7365 GRITA Res Grp Injectable Forms & Associa, F-59000 Lille, France
[6] Inst Ceur Poumon, CIC IT Lille 1403, Bd Prof Jules ,3eme Etage Leclercq, F-59037 Lille, France
来源
关键词
Ergonomics; Decision support systems; Clinical pharmacists; Medication review; HUMAN-FACTORS PRINCIPLES; PRESCRIBING ERRORS; PATIENT OUTCOMES; TECHNOLOGY; ALERTS; IMPLEMENTATION; ACCEPTANCE; VALIDITY; RECORDS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.08.012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) help hospital-based clinical pharmacists to perform medication reviews and so are promising tools for improving medication safety. However, their poor usability can reduce effectiveness and acceptability. Objectives: To evaluate the usability and perceived usefulness of a CDSS for medication review by hospital-based pharmacists and to draw up guidelines on improving its usability. Methods: We performed a convergent, parallel evaluation. Firstly, three researchers conducted a heuristic evaluation of the CDSS. Secondly, clinical pharmacists who use the CDSS filled out the Usefulness, Satisfaction and Ease of Use (USE) questionnaire. Lastly, semi-structured interviews with the pharmacists enabled us to understand their opinions and experiences. The results of the heuristic evaluation were used to identify potential improvements in the CDSS. We performed a statistical analysis of the USE questionnaire data. Interviews were analyzed based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), together with a tasktechnology fit model. The results generated by these three approaches were compared in order to determine convergences and divergences, identify challenges related to the usability and usefulness of the CDSS, and draw up guidelines for its improvement. Results: Forty-seven usability problems were discovered; they variously concerned the graphical user interface, the pharmacists' needs, and the medication review model implemented in the CDSS. Only the "usefulness" dimension of the USE was not scored positively. All the UTAUT dimensions and the task-technology fit dimension emerged in the interviews. Cross-comparisons of the results from the three approaches led to the identification of four challenges and the corresponding formulation of 23 guidelines. Conclusions: The guidelines developed here should help to improve the design and acceptability of CDSSs. Hence, CDSSs will be able to assist clinical pharmacists more fully with their medication reviews and help to further improve patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 154
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems and Antibiotic Prescribing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Carracedo-Martinez, Eduardo
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Christian
    Teixeira-Rodrigues, Antonio
    Prego-Dominguez, Jesus
    Takkouche, Bahi
    Herdeiro, Maria Teresa
    Figueiras, Adolfo
    Caamano-Isorna, Francisco
    Gestal-Otero, Juan J.
    Taracido, Margarita
    Zapata-Cachafeiro, Maruxa
    Lopez Vazquez, Paula
    Manuel Vazquez-Lago, Juan
    Pineiro-Lamas, Maria
    Lopez-Duran, Ana
    Salgado, Angel
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 41 (03) : 552 - 581
  • [42] Improving usability in decision support systems: Practical use of the decision enquiry approach for requirements analysis
    Parker, C
    USABILITY: GAINING A COMPETITIVE EDGE, 2002, 99 : 257 - 266
  • [43] Seeking Evidence to Support Usability Principles for Medication-Related Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Functions
    Marcilly, Romaric
    Beuscart-Zephir, Marie-Catherine
    Ammenwerth, Elske
    Pelayo, Sylvia
    MEDINFO 2013: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 192 : 427 - 431
  • [44] Incorporating usability design factors into development of Clinical Decision Support Systems
    Yang, L
    Frize, M
    Eng, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4: A NEW BEGINNING FOR HUMAN HEALTH, 2003, 25 : 3594 - 3597
  • [45] Usability evaluation of a clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management
    Kastner, Monika
    Lottridge, Danielle
    Marquez, Christine
    Newton, David
    Straus, Sharon E.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5
  • [46] Involving users in the design and usability evaluation of a clinical decision support system
    Carroll, C
    Marsden, P
    Soden, P
    Naylor, E
    New, J
    Dornan, T
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2002, 69 (02) : 123 - 135
  • [47] Usability evaluation of a clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management
    Monika Kastner
    Danielle Lottridge
    Christine Marquez
    David Newton
    Sharon E Straus
    Implementation Science, 5
  • [48] A survey about the usefulness of computerized systems to support illness management in clinical practice
    Ruland, CM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2004, 73 (11-12) : 797 - 805
  • [49] EvalCHOICE: A Decision Support Approach for the Usability Evaluation of Interactive Adaptive Systems
    Dhouib, Amira
    Trabelsi, Abdelawheb
    Kolski, Christophe
    Neji, Mahmoud
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2017, 112 : 864 - 873
  • [50] A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF MEDICATION-RELATED CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT
    Brown, Clare L.
    Slight, Sarah P.
    Husband, Andrew K.
    Watson, Neil W.
    Bates, David W.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S86 - S87