Performance measurement and management system 4.0: an action research study in investee NPOs by local government

被引:1
|
作者
Sardi, Alberto [1 ]
Sorano, Enrico [1 ]
Giovando, Guido [1 ]
Tradori, Vania [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Management, Turin, Italy
关键词
Performance measurement; Performance management; Public sector; Not-for-profit organisations; Technology; 4; 0; Industry; PUBLIC-SECTOR; BALANCED SCORECARD; COMPETENCES; DEFINITION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1108/IJPPM-10-2021-0607
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The Fourth Industrial Revolution is increasing the use of digital technologies for delivering products and services. A performance measurement and management system (PMMS) is recognised as a useful system to guide era 4.0; however, the literature has not adequately addressed this challenge in public government and not-for-profit organisations (NPOs). This research aims to investigate the evolution of the PMMS adopted by a local government for the control of investee NPOs in era 4.0. Design/methodology/approach Through action research, the authors investigate an Italian municipality and its main investee NPOs. The project involved 4 researchers and 25 managers of the local government and NPOs. Findings This paper describes the design of a PMMS developed for a local government to control its investee NPOs. Considering the regulations and managerial needs, the designed system evolved from a fragmented set of indicators based on legitimacy and economic perspectives to a holistic set of indicators based on a comprehensive set of perspectives to consider the changing business environment. Originality/value This study sheds light on the design of a PMMS adopted by local governments for controlling investee NPOs in era 4.0. The paper contributes (1) to identify the main control needs for the design of a PMMS in a public network and (2) to capture the evolution of a PMMS in light of era 4.0 by developing two conceptual propositions.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:849 / 872
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Study on the indicator system of government performance measurement based on new dimensions
    Tang Shu-kun
    Liu Ying
    Fang Yuan-yuan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (3RD), VOL I, 2007, : 324 - 331
  • [32] A local government authority leading action research: Impacts and replicability
    Gunetilleke, Neranjana
    COMMONWEALTH JOURNAL OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE, 2010, (05): : 47 - 65
  • [33] The Performance-evaluation Target System Research of the Minimum Subsistence Security of Local Government
    Chen Shujun
    Fu Shanna
    COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF ECONOMY AND SOCIETY WITH STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, : 397 - +
  • [34] CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT IN PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING A Comparative Case Study from Local Government
    Woolum, Janet
    PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 35 (01) : 79 - 102
  • [35] Strategy-Oriented Environmental Performance Management System For the Leaders in Local Party and Government
    Zhou Jingkun
    Liu Zhonggang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION & RISK MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 1139 - 1144
  • [36] Digital Performance Management: An Evaluation of Manufacturing Performance Management and Measurement Strategies in an Industry 4.0 Context
    Smith, Nathaniel David
    Hovanski, Yuri
    Tenny, Joe
    Bergner, Sebastian
    MACHINES, 2024, 12 (08)
  • [37] Research on the Deviation of Chinese Local Government Performance Evaluation
    He, Wensheng
    Liao, Lingling
    Cai, Mingjun
    2012 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING (BIFE), 2012, : 527 - 531
  • [38] Performance Management: Putting Research into Action
    Brumback, Gary B.
    London, Manuel
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (02) : 501 - 507
  • [39] PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT: IS PRACTICE INFLUENCED BY DOCTRINE?
    Ammons, David N.
    Roenigk, Dale J.
    PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 38 (03) : 514 - 541
  • [40] Performance management, evaluation and learning in 'modern' local government
    Sanderson, I
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2001, 79 (02) : 297 - 313