Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Treatment Options for Advanced Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Zhao, Luqing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Zhiting [4 ]
Yan, Xiaoqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hu, Xiao [5 ,6 ,8 ]
Feng, Jifeng [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
Yu, Shaorong [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Canc Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Inst Canc Res, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Air Force Hosp Eastern Theater PLA, Dept Oncol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Suqian Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Oncol, Suqian, Peoples R China
[6] Suqian First Hosp, Suqian, Peoples R China
[7] Baiziting 42, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[8] Suzhi Rd 120, Suqian 223800, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
advanced SCLC; chemotherapy; combination; immunotherapy; second-line treatment; single-agent; NIVOLUMAB PLUS IPILIMUMAB; OPEN-LABEL; CHECKMATE; 032; TOPOTECAN; RECURRENT; MULTICENTER; ETOPOSIDE; PEMBROLIZUMAB; CHEMOTHERAPY; CARBOPLATIN;
D O I
10.1177/15330338241227055
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: As monotherapy such as topotecan has reached a plateau of effectiveness, new second-line treatments based on experience have been used in clinical application. This study compared the efficacy and safety of different second-line treatments for advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).Methods: A total of 380 patients with advanced SCLC were screened selectively in the retrospective study. Adverse events and patient responses were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 and Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors v1.1. The progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method or Cox survival regression model and compared using the log-rank test.Results: In the platinum-resistant group, disease control rate (DCR) and median PFS (mPFS) were prolonged in the combination group versus single-agent group (DCR: 49.24% vs 24.39%, P = .004; mPFS: 3.73 vs 1.90 months, P < .001). Grade 3/4 toxicity was similar between the 2 groups (P = .683). The mPFS did not differ among single-agent groups (P = .380). No significant difference was observed in mPFS of different combination therapy groups (P = .170). In terms of platinum-based chemotherapy, the DCR and mPFS were prolonged in irinotecan-platinum group versus taxol-platinum group (DCR: 56.14% vs 9.09%, P = .004; mPFS: 3.87 vs 1.93 months, P = .012). Grade 3/4 toxicity was similar between the 2 groups (P = .614). The mPFS was prolonged in the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy group versus single-agent chemotherapy group (P = .003). In the platinum-sensitive group, the mPFS did not differ between the combination group and single-agent group (P = .200). The mPFS did not differ among different single-agent groups (P = .260) or combination groups (P = .150). There was no difference in mPFS among different platinum-based chemotherapy groups (P = .830).Conclusions: For patients with platinum-resistant SCLC, combination therapy has shown better efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile than monotherapy. Among combination therapies, irinotecan-platinum has shown better efficacy than taxol-platinum. For patients with platinum-sensitive SCLC, the efficacy of different single-agent or combination therapies was similar.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes of small-cell lung cancer patients treated with second-line chemotherapy: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis
    Garassino, Marina Chiara
    Torri, Valter
    Michetti, Giovanni
    Lo Dico, Monica
    La Verde, Nicla
    Aglione, Stefania
    Mancuso, Andrea
    Gallerani, Elisa
    Galetta, Domenico
    Martelli, Olga
    Collova, Elena
    Fatigoni, Sonia
    Ghidini, Antonio
    Saggia, Chiara
    Bareggi, Claudia
    Rossi, Antonio
    Farina, Gabriella
    Thatcher, Nicholas
    Blackhall, Fiona
    Lorigan, Paul
    Califano, Raffaele
    LUNG CANCER, 2011, 72 (03) : 378 - 383
  • [32] Epirubicin plus Paclitaxel Regimen as Second-line Treatment of Patients with Small-cell Lung Cancer
    Pasello, Giulia
    Carli, Paolo
    Canova, Fabio
    Bonanno, Laura
    Polo, Valentina
    Zago, Giulia
    Urso, Loredana
    Conte, Pierfranco
    Favaretto, Adolfo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (04) : 2183 - 2189
  • [33] Evaluation of second-line treatment options in non-small cell lung cancer - Introduction
    Scagliotti, GV
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2006, 33 (01) : S1 - S2
  • [34] The Efficacy and Safety of PlatinumNinorelbine as More Than Second-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Song, Ik-Chan
    Lee, Hyo-Jin
    Yang, Young-Jun
    Choi, Yoon-Seok
    Ryu, Hye-Won
    Lee, Myung-Won
    Moon, Ji Young
    Jo, Deog-Yeon
    Kim, Samyong
    Yun, Hwan-Jung
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 47 (04): : 638 - 644
  • [35] Efficacy and safety analysis of anlotinib combined with immunotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Shi, Q.
    Xie, Q.
    Lin, H.
    He, Y.
    Zheng, X.
    Zhou, Z.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S1568 - S1568
  • [36] Efficacy and safety analysis of anlotinib in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for second-line and subsequent extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer
    Ying, Xixi
    Shi, Zheng
    Shao, Rongjun
    You, Guangxian
    Song, Zhengbo
    NEOPLASMA, 2024, 71 (03) : 297 - 305
  • [37] Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Treatment Options for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
    Zhao, Luqing
    Zhao, Zhiting
    Yan, Xiaoqi
    Wu, Fei
    Sun, Ning
    Guo, Renhong
    Yu, Shaorong
    Hu, Xiao
    Feng, Jifeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 2024
  • [38] Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy
    Schwander, Bjoern
    Ravera, Simona
    Giuliani, Giovanni
    Nuijten, Mark
    Walzer, Stefan
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2012, 4 : 237 - 243
  • [39] Second-line treatment options in non-small cell lung cancer: A comparison of cytotoxic agents and targeted therapies
    de Marinis, F
    De Santis, S
    De Petris, L
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2006, 33 (01) : S17 - S24
  • [40] Second-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331
    Spigel, D. R.
    Vicente, D.
    Ciuleanu, T. E.
    Gettinger, S.
    Peters, S.
    Horn, L.
    Audigier-Valette, C.
    Pardo Aranda, N.
    Juan-Vidal, O.
    Cheng, Y.
    Zhang, H.
    Shi, M.
    Luft, A.
    Wolf, J.
    Antonia, S.
    Nakagawa, K.
    Fairchild, J.
    Baudelet, C.
    Pandya, D.
    Doshi, P.
    Chang, H.
    Reck, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 (05) : 631 - 641