Time-domain dynamic constitutive model suitable for mucky soil site seismic response

被引:3
|
作者
Dong, Qing [1 ]
Chen, Su [2 ]
Jin, Liguo [3 ]
Zhou, Zhenghua [4 ]
Li, Xiaojun [2 ]
机构
[1] Huaiyin Inst Technol, Architectural Engn Inst, Huaian 223600, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Technol, Key Lab Urban Secur & Disaster Engn, Minist Educ, Beijing 100020, Peoples R China
[3] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geophys, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Transportat Sci & Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
seismic response; time-domain dynamic constitutive model; logarithmic dynamic skeleton; dampening effect; mucky soil; FINITE-ELEMENT-METHOD; EARTHQUAKE; FREQUENCY; MODULUS;
D O I
10.1007/s11803-024-2222-3
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Soil nonlinear behavior displays noticeable effects on the site seismic response. This study proposes a new functional expression of the skeleton curve to replace the hyperbolic skeleton curve. By integrating shear modulus and combining the dynamic skeleton curve and the damping degradation coefficient, the constitutive equation of the logarithmic dynamic skeleton can be obtained, which considers the damping effect in a soil dynamics problem. Based on the finite difference method and the multi-transmitting boundary condition, a 1D site seismic response analysis program called Soilresp1D has been developed herein and used to analyze the time-domain seismic response in three types of sites. At the same time, this study also provides numerical simulation results based on the hyperbolic constitutive model and the equivalent linear method. The results verify the rationality of the new soil dynamic constitutive model. It can analyze the mucky soil site nonlinear seismic response, reflecting the deformation characteristics and damping effect of the silty soil. The hysteresis loop area is more extensive, and the residual strain is evident.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Time-domain response of the ARIANNA detector
    Barwick, S. W.
    Berg, E. C.
    Besson, D. Z.
    Duffin, T.
    Hanson, J. C.
    Klein, S. R.
    Kleinfelder, S. A.
    Piasecki, M.
    Ratzlaff, K.
    Reed, C.
    Roumi, M.
    Stezelberger, T.
    Tatar, J.
    Walker, J.
    Young, R.
    Zou, L.
    ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2015, 62 : 139 - 151
  • [32] Procedure for time-domain seismic analyses of concrete dams
    Yang, R
    Tsai, CS
    Lee, GC
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1996, 122 (02): : 116 - 122
  • [33] Time-Domain Classification of Humans using Seismic Sensors
    Schumer, Sean
    UNATTENDED GROUND, SEA, AND AIR SENSOR TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS XII, 2010, 7693
  • [35] On the physical meaning of time-domain constitutive models with complex parameters
    Nicos Makris
    Meccanica, 2020, 55 : 453 - 467
  • [36] Research on Time-domain Dynamic Response of Tension Leg Platform in Regular Wave
    Liu wei-min
    APPLIED MECHANICS, MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING IV, 2014, 670-671 : 801 - 804
  • [37] Soil damping formulation in nonlinear time domain site response analysis
    Park, D
    Hashash, YMA
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2004, 8 (02) : 249 - 274
  • [38] Structural identification through the measure of deterministic and stochastic time-domain dynamic response
    Cacciola, P.
    Maugeri, N.
    Muscolino, G.
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2011, 89 (19-20) : 1812 - 1819
  • [39] A comparative study of the effect of the soil constitutive model on the seismic response of buried concrete pipes
    Alzabeebee, Saif
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 2 (01): : 87 - 96
  • [40] Dynamic response of structures to thunderstorm outflows: Response spectrum technique vs time-domain analysis
    Solari, Giovanni
    De Gaetano, Patrizia
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 176 : 188 - 207