Image processing and machine learning for diagnosis and screening of craniosynostosis in children

被引:1
|
作者
Sabeti, Maliheh [1 ]
Boostani, Reza [2 ]
Taheri, Behnam [1 ]
Moradi, Ehsan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Comp Engn, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, CSE & IT Dept, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Tehran, Iran
[4] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Childrens Hlth, Pediat Surg Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Craniosynostosis; Deep learning neural network; Cranial indices; NON-SYNDROMIC CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.inat.2023.101887
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: craniosynostosis (CSO) is a congenital disorder resulting from early closure of cranial sutures in newborns, while could cause significant cosmetic and neurodevelopmental problems. As a standard method, different craniometric indices are measured directly from child head or from their 3D CT scan of skull for diagnosis or in post-operative follow-up period. We propose a novel telehealth-compatible deep learning neural network-based method for identifying different craniometric indices in non-syndromic CSO patients 2D photo-graphic data.Methods: 624 pre-operative and post-operative top-down cranial digital images of 145 craniosynostotic infants (59 sagittal, 55 metopic and 31 unicoronal synostosis) who had surgery at Mofid Children's Hospital, Tehran, Iran were used in a deep learning neural network algorithm. Head boundary was defined by a faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) and then different cranial indices (cranial index (CI), cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI), anterior-posterior width ratio (APWR), anterior-midline width ratio (AMWR) and left-right height ratio (LRHR)) were calculated from segmented images. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for software versus specialist data association between cranial indices were evaluated with inter-class correlation coefficients.Results: The head border was segmented in the proposed images with accuracy of 88.67 +/- 1.94 in comparison with standard hand made procedure with a sensitivity of 86.91 +/- 3.75 and specificity of 88.60 +/- 4.81. Among calculated cranial indices, significant decrease in CI value is most useful for diagnosis of sagittal synostosis (CIsagittal= 71.97 +/- 4.33), significant increase in CVAI value and significant decrease in LRHR value is most appropriate for unicoronal suture synostosis diagnosis (CVAIunicoronal= 6.79 +/- 3.80 and LRHRunicoronal = 0.91 +/- 0.05) and significant decrease in APWR and AMWR values could be indicator of metopic synostosis (AMWRmetopic = 0.77 +/- 0.04 and APWRmatopic = 0.83 +/- 0.05). Conclusion: Deep learning neural network algorithms could have high levels of capability in calculating cranial indices from routine 2D digital images of non-syndromic craniosynostotic children and act as a substitute for optical scanner or 3D CT-based craniometrics. This method could act as a corner stone for developing a software for a mobile platform that that would allow for screening by tele-medicine or in a primary care setting.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in image processing
    Xu, Pingyuan
    Wang, Jinyuan
    Jiang, Yu
    Gong, Xiangbing
    FRONTIERS IN MATERIALS, 2024, 11
  • [22] Machine Learning for Medical Image Processing and Pattern Recognition
    Suzuki, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3396 - +
  • [23] Machine (Deep) Learning Methods for Image Processing and Radiomics
    Hatt, Mathieu
    Parmar, Chintan
    Qi, Jinyi
    El Naqa, Issam
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 3 (02) : 104 - 108
  • [24] Image Processing and Machine Learning for Diagnostic Analysis of Microcirculation
    Demir, Sumeyra
    Mirshahi, Nazanin
    Tiba, M. Hakam
    Draucker, Gerard
    Ward, Kevin
    Hobson, Rosalyn
    Najarian, Kayvan
    2009 ICME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX MEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, : 60 - +
  • [25] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Sensing and Image Processing
    Chen, Jing
    Wang, Miaohui
    Hsia, Chih-Hsien
    SENSORS, 2025, 25 (06)
  • [26] Special Issue on Machine Learning for Text and Image Processing
    Lv, Jianhui
    Lin, Zhiwei
    Cheng, Hui
    Zhang, Qingyi
    Ma, Lianbo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2022, 31 (04)
  • [27] Advances in image processing using machine learning techniques
    Jovanovic Dolecek, Gordana
    Cho, Namik
    IET SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2022, 16 (06) : 615 - 618
  • [28] Machine Learning for Plant Phenotyping Needs Image Processing
    Tsaftaris, Sotirios A.
    Minervini, Massimo
    Scharr, Hanno
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 21 (12) : 989 - 991
  • [29] A combination of machine learning and image processing technologies for the classification of image regions
    Lattner, AD
    Miene, A
    Herzog, O
    ADAPTIVE MULTIMEDIA RETRIEVAL, 2004, 3094 : 185 - 199
  • [30] CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS - IMAGE QUALITY, CONFIDENCE, AND CORRECTNESS IN DIAGNOSIS
    PILGRAM, TK
    VANNIER, MW
    HILDEBOLT, CF
    MARSH, JL
    MCALISTER, WH
    SHACKELFORD, GD
    OFFUTT, CJ
    KNAPP, RH
    RADIOLOGY, 1989, 173 (03) : 675 - 679