General population reference values for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung and PROMIS-29

被引:6
|
作者
Mohindra, Nisha A. [1 ,2 ]
Peipert, John Devin [3 ,5 ]
Blum, Steven I. [4 ]
Shaw, James W. [4 ]
Penrod, John R. [4 ]
Cella, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med Social Sci, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ USA
[5] 625 Michigan Ave,21st Floor, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2023年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
lung cancer; patient-reported outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VALIDITY; COVID-19; HEALTH; NORMS; ECOG;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.5920
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Therapeutic advances in lung cancer have turned attention toward patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as important clinical outcomes. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) is a common endpoint in lung cancer trials. This study calculated FACT-L reference values for the United States (US) general population.Methods: Adults from the US general population (N = 2001) were surveyed between September 2020 and November 2020. Surveys contained 126 questions, including the FACT-L [36 items; FACT-G and four subscales (Physical Well-Being [PWB], Social Well-Being [SWB], Emotional Well-Being [EWB], and Functional Well-Being [FWB]) and the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), and a Trial Outcome Index (TOI)]. Reference values for each FACT-L scale were calculated with means for the total sample and separately for participants with: no comorbidities, COVID-19 as only comorbidity, no COVID-19.Results: In the total sample, the reference scores were as follows: PWB = 23.1; SWB = 16.8; EWB = 18.5; FWB = 17.6; FACT-G = 76.0; LCS = 23.0, TOI = 63.7, and FACT-L Total = 99.0. Scores were lower for those reporting a prior diagnosis of COVID-19, especially for SWB (15.7) and FWB (15.3). SWB scores were lower than previous references values.Conclusions: These data provide US general adult population reference value set for FACT-L. While some of the subscale results were lower than those found in the reference data for other PROMs, these data were obtained in a more contemporaneous time frame juxtaposed with the COVID-19 pandemic and may represent a new peri-pandemic norm. Thus, these reference values will be useful for future clinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:12765 / 12776
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Queensland cancer risk study: general population norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
    Janda, Monika
    DiSipio, Tracey
    Hurst, Cameron
    Cella, David
    Newman, Beth
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (06) : 606 - 614
  • [32] General population norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI)
    Butt, Zeeshan
    Peipert, John
    Webster, Kimberly
    Chen, Connie
    Cella, David
    CANCER, 2013, 119 (02) : 429 - 437
  • [33] Measurement Properties of the Chinese Language Version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General in a Singaporean Population
    Cheung, Yin Bun
    Goh, Cynthia
    Wee, Joseph
    Khoo, Kei Siong
    Thumboo, Julian
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2009, 38 (03) : 225 - 229
  • [34] Psychometric properties and reference values of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sleep item banks in the Dutch general population
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    van Litsenburg, Raphaele R. L.
    Elsman, Ellen B. M.
    Roorda, Leo D.
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (02)
  • [35] Predictive values of lung cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study
    Haastrup, Peter F.
    Jarbol, Dorte E.
    Balasubramaniam, Kirubakaran
    Saetre, Lisa M. S.
    Sondergaard, Jens
    Rasmussen, Sanne
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 30 (01)
  • [36] Predictive values of lung cancer alarm symptoms in the general population: a nationwide cohort study
    Peter F. Haastrup
    Dorte E. Jarbøl
    Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam
    Lisa M. S. Sætre
    Jens Søndergaard
    Sanne Rasmussen
    npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 30
  • [37] General population and cancer patient norms for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) (vol 28, pg 370, 2005)
    Brucker, PS
    Yost, K
    Cashy, J
    Webster, K
    Cella, D
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2005, 28 (03) : 370 - 370
  • [38] What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study 5592
    Cella, D
    Eton, DT
    Fairclough, DL
    Bonomi, P
    Heyes, AE
    Silberman, C
    Wolf, MK
    Johnson, DH
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (03) : 285 - 295
  • [39] Estimating health-state utility values for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General mapping algorithms
    Hettle, Robert
    Borrill, John
    Suri, Gaurav
    Wulff, Jerome
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 7 : 615 - 627
  • [40] General Population Norms for the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale
    Montan, Inka
    Loewe, Bernd
    Cella, David
    Mehnert, Anja
    Hinz, Andreas
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 (11) : 1313 - 1321