General population reference values for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung and PROMIS-29

被引:6
|
作者
Mohindra, Nisha A. [1 ,2 ]
Peipert, John Devin [3 ,5 ]
Blum, Steven I. [4 ]
Shaw, James W. [4 ]
Penrod, John R. [4 ]
Cella, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med Social Sci, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ USA
[5] 625 Michigan Ave,21st Floor, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2023年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
lung cancer; patient-reported outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VALIDITY; COVID-19; HEALTH; NORMS; ECOG;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.5920
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Therapeutic advances in lung cancer have turned attention toward patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as important clinical outcomes. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) is a common endpoint in lung cancer trials. This study calculated FACT-L reference values for the United States (US) general population.Methods: Adults from the US general population (N = 2001) were surveyed between September 2020 and November 2020. Surveys contained 126 questions, including the FACT-L [36 items; FACT-G and four subscales (Physical Well-Being [PWB], Social Well-Being [SWB], Emotional Well-Being [EWB], and Functional Well-Being [FWB]) and the Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS), and a Trial Outcome Index (TOI)]. Reference values for each FACT-L scale were calculated with means for the total sample and separately for participants with: no comorbidities, COVID-19 as only comorbidity, no COVID-19.Results: In the total sample, the reference scores were as follows: PWB = 23.1; SWB = 16.8; EWB = 18.5; FWB = 17.6; FACT-G = 76.0; LCS = 23.0, TOI = 63.7, and FACT-L Total = 99.0. Scores were lower for those reporting a prior diagnosis of COVID-19, especially for SWB (15.7) and FWB (15.3). SWB scores were lower than previous references values.Conclusions: These data provide US general adult population reference value set for FACT-L. While some of the subscale results were lower than those found in the reference data for other PROMs, these data were obtained in a more contemporaneous time frame juxtaposed with the COVID-19 pandemic and may represent a new peri-pandemic norm. Thus, these reference values will be useful for future clinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:12765 / 12776
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Norwegian PROMIS-29: psychometric validation in the general population for Norway
    Garratt, Andrew M.
    Coste, Joel
    Rouquette, Alexandra
    Valderas, Jose M.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [2] The Norwegian PROMIS-29: psychometric validation in the general population for Norway
    Andrew M. Garratt
    Joël Coste
    Alexandra Rouquette
    José M. Valderas
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 5
  • [3] Ambulatory Cancer and US General Population Reference Values and Cutoff Scores for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy
    Pearman, Timothy
    Yanez, Betina
    Peipert, John
    Wortman, Katy
    Beaumont, Jennifer
    Cella, David
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (18) : 2902 - 2909
  • [4] Use of PROMIS-29® in US Veterans: Diagnostic Concordance and Domain Comparisons with the General Population
    Sherri L. LaVela
    Bella Etingen
    Scott Miskevics
    David Cella
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2019, 34 : 1452 - 1458
  • [5] Measurement invariance and general population reference values of the PROMIS Profile 29 in the UK, France, and Germany
    Fischer, Felix
    Gibbons, Chris
    Coste, Joel
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Rose, Matthias
    Leplege, Alain
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (04) : 999 - 1014
  • [6] Measurement invariance and general population reference values of the PROMIS Profile 29 in the UK, France, and Germany
    Felix Fischer
    Chris Gibbons
    Joël Coste
    Jose M. Valderas
    Matthias Rose
    Alain Leplège
    Quality of Life Research, 2018, 27 : 999 - 1014
  • [7] Use of PROMIS-29® in US Veterans: Diagnostic Concordance and Domain Comparisons with the General Population
    LaVela, Sherri L.
    Etingen, Bella
    Miskevics, Scott
    Cella, David
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (08) : 1452 - 1458
  • [8] The French PROMIS-29. Psychometric validation and population reference values
    Coste, J.
    Rouquette, A.
    Valderas, J. M.
    Rose, M.
    Leplege, A.
    REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2018, 66 (05): : 316 - 323
  • [9] GENERAL POPULATION REFERENCE VALUES FOR THE PROMIS GLOBAL HEALTH IN HUNGARY
    Bato, A.
    Brodszky, V
    Mitev, A. Z.
    Mucsi, I
    Rencz, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S235 - S235
  • [10] Hungarian PROMIS-29+2: psychometric properties and population reference values
    Balázs Jenei
    Alex Bató
    Ariel Z. Mitev
    Valentin Brodszky
    Fanni Rencz
    Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2179 - 2194