A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score-accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Minghu [1 ]
Hu, Zhiwei [2 ]
Miao, Lihui [1 ]
Shi, Manman [1 ]
Gao, Qiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Rehabil Hosp, Emergency Dept, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Acupuncture Moxibust & Tuina, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Rehabil Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Room 313,Bldg 9,15 Xixiazhuang South Rd, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
emergency department (ED); emergency department assessment of chest pain score-accelerated diagnostic protocol (EDACS-ADP); major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); systematic review; SENSITIVITY TROPONIN-I; VALIDATION; DISCHARGE; ACCURACY; PATHWAYS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1002/clc.24126
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The emergency department assessment of chest pain score-accelerated diagnostic protocol (EDACS-ADP) are commonly used for risk stratification in undifferentiated patients with acute chest pain. This systematic review aimed to investigate EDACS-ADP for risk stratification of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. The PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched for related studies without restrictions on the publication year. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and Stata 16.0 was used to determine the combined sensitivity, specificity, positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR), and negative DLR. Twelve studies comprising 14 290 patients were identified. Of these, 7537 (52.74%) patients were considered low risk, and 67 (0.89%) had major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death within 30 days of the patients' ED presentation. EDACS-ADP showed a combined sensitivity of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.99); specificity, 0.58 (0.53-0.63); positive DLR, 2.34 (2.08-2.63); negative DLR, 0.04 (0.02-0.09); diagnostic odds ratio, 53.11 (26.45-106.63); and summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, 0.83 (0.79-0.86). Despite the large statistical heterogeneity of the results, EDACS-ADP identified a considerable number of low-risk patients for early discharge, with a specificity >50% and an incidence of MACE within 30-days of patients' ED presentation <1%. Thus, it is a useful tool with a potential for clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1309
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparative analysis of risk stratification tools for emergency department patients with chest pain
    Burkett E.
    Marwick T.
    Thom O.
    Kelly A.-M.
    International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2014, 7 (1)
  • [22] Heart rate variability in the risk stratification of emergency department patients with chest pain
    Welborn, Robert
    Mohr, Nicholas M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (02): : 363 - 365
  • [23] Risk Stratification for Patients with Chest Pain Discharged Home from the Emergency Department
    Kavsak, Peter A.
    Cerasuolo, Joshua O.
    Mondoux, Shawn E.
    Sherbino, Jonathan
    Ma, Jinhui
    Hoard, Brock K.
    Perez, Richard
    Seow, Hsien
    Ko, Dennis T.
    Worster, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (09) : 1 - 9
  • [24] Diagnostic accuracy of the TIMI risk score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a metar-analysis
    Hess, Erik P.
    Agarwal, Dipti
    Chandra, Subhash
    Murad, Mohammed H.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Hollander, Judd E.
    Montori, Victor M.
    Stiell, Ian G.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (10) : 1039 - 1044
  • [25] The Impact of an Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol Using Conventional Troponin I for Patients With Cardiac Chest Pain in the Emergency Department
    Hill, Jesse
    Yang, Esther H.
    Lefebvre, Dennis
    Doran, Shandra
    van Diepen, Sean
    Raizman, Joshua E.
    Tsui, Albert K. Y.
    Rowe, Brian H.
    CJC OPEN, 2024, 6 (07) : 915 - 924
  • [26] Using the HEART Score in Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department
    Moumneh, Thomas
    Douillet, Delphine
    Roy, Pierre-Marie
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 167 (09) : 687 - 688
  • [27] Communicating risk to emergency department patients with chest pain
    France, J.
    Keen, C.
    Bowyer, S.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2008, 25 (05) : 276 - 278
  • [28] A 2-hour accelerated chest pain protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in an accident and emergency department in Hong Kong
    Ko, H. F.
    Lee, H. Y.
    Ho, H. F.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 20 (05) : 261 - 269
  • [29] Comparison of accelerated diagnostic pathways for acute chest pain risk stratification
    Stopyra, Jason
    Snavely, Anna Catherine
    Hiestand, Brian
    Wells, Brian J.
    Lenoir, Kristin Macfarlane
    Herrington, David
    Hendley, Nella
    Ashburn, Nicklaus P.
    Miller, Chadwick D.
    Mahler, Simon A.
    HEART, 2020, 106 (13) : 977 - 984
  • [30] Update on the emergency department diagnosis and risk stratification of acute chest pain
    Vrints, Christiaan J. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2020, 9 (01) : 3 - 4