Investigating contingent adoption of additive manufacturing in supply chains

被引:6
|
作者
Patil, Himali [1 ]
Niranjan, Suman [1 ]
Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan [2 ]
Narayanan, Arunachalam [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas, Dept Logist & Operat Management, Denton, TX USA
[2] Univ Liverpool, Management Sch, Dept Operat & Supply Chain Management, Liverpool, England
[3] Univ North Texas, Dept Informat Technol & Decis Sci, Denton, TX 76203 USA
关键词
Additive manufacturing; 3D printing; Contingent factors; Supply chain management; Typology for AM adoption; INDUSTRY; 4.0; TECHNOLOGIES; 3D PRINTING TECHNOLOGY; IMPACT; OPPORTUNITIES; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; FUTURE; PERSPECTIVE; INTEGRATION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1108/IJOPM-05-2022-0286
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to investigate the contingent adoption of Additive Manufacturing (AM) and propose a typology to evaluate its adoption viability within a firm's supply chain.Design/methodology/approachBy conducting semi-structured interviews of practitioners with deep knowledge of AM and supply chains from diverse industries, this research explores the contingent factors influencing AM adoption and their interaction.FindingsWhile the AM literature is growing, there is a lack of research investigating how contingent factors influence AM adoption. By reviewing the extant literature on the benefits and barriers of AM, we explain the underlying contingencies that enact them. Further, we use an exploratory approach to validate and uncover underexplored contingent factors that influence AM adoption and group them into technological, organizational and strategic factors. By anchoring to a selected set of contingent factors, a typological framework is developed to explain when and how AM is a viable option.Research limitations/implicationsThis study focuses on specific industries such as automotive, machine manufacturing, aerospace and defense. Scholars are encouraged to explore the contextual factors affecting AM adoption in particular industries to expand our findings. The authors also acknowledge that the robustness of their framework can be enhanced by integrating the remaining contingent factors.Practical implicationsThe developed typological framework provides a pathway for practitioners to see how and when AM can be useful in their supply chains.Originality/valueThis is the first paper in the supply chain management literature to synthesize contingent factors and identify some overlooked factors for AM adoption. The research is also unique in explaining the interaction among selected factors to provide a typological framework for AM adoption. This research provides novel insights for managers to understand when and where to adopt AM and the key contingent factors involved in AM adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 519
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: Implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing
    Bogers, Marcel
    Hadar, Ronen
    Bilberg, Arne
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 102 : 225 - 239
  • [32] Analyzing blockchain adoption barriers in manufacturing supply chains by the neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process
    Amin Vafadarnikjoo
    Hadi Badri Ahmadi
    James J. H. Liou
    Tiago Botelho
    Konstantinos Chalvatzis
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2023, 327 : 129 - 156
  • [33] Analyzing blockchain adoption barriers in manufacturing supply chains by the neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process
    Vafadarnikjoo, Amin
    Ahmadi, Hadi Badri
    Liou, James J. H.
    Botelho, Tiago
    Chalvatzis, Konstantinos
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 327 (01) : 129 - 156
  • [34] Supplier integration strategy for lean manufacturing adoption in electronic-enabled supply chains
    So, Stuart
    Sun, Hongyi
    [J]. SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2010, 15 (06) : 474 - 487
  • [35] Investigating components affecting the resource efficiency of incorporating metal additive manufacturing in process chains
    Girdwood, Richard
    Bezuidenhout, Martin
    Hugo, Philip
    Conradie, Pieter
    Oosthuizen, Gert
    Dimitrov, Dimiter
    [J]. 14TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING, GCSM 2016, 2017, 8 : 52 - 58
  • [36] The implications of additive manufacturing technology adoption for supply chain resilience: A systematic search and review
    Naghshineh, Bardia
    Carvalho, Helena
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2022, 247
  • [37] Adoption of additive manufacturing technology: drivers, barriers and impacts on upstream supply chain design
    Ronchini, Alessio
    Moretto, Antonella Maria
    Caniato, Federico
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 53 (04) : 532 - 554
  • [38] Additive manufacturing value chain adoption
    Luomaranta, Toni
    Martinsuo, Miia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 33 (09) : 40 - 60
  • [39] Adoption of Additive Manufacturing in the Medical World
    Steenhuis, H. J.
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY (ICMIT), 2016, : 304 - 308
  • [40] The Adoption of Additive Manufacturing Technology in Sweden
    Kianian, Babak
    Tavassoli, Sam
    Larsson, Tobias C.
    Diegel, Olaf
    [J]. 13TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - DECOUPLING GROWTH FROM RESOURCE USE, 2016, 40 : 7 - 12