Emotions and Psychological Mechanisms of Listening to Music in Cochlear Implant Recipients

被引:2
|
作者
Yuksel, Mustafa [1 ]
Sarlik, Esra [2 ]
Ciprut, Ayca [3 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Medipol Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Speech & Language Therapy, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Marmara Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Audiol & Speech Disorders Program, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Marmara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Audiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2023年 / 44卷 / 06期
关键词
Cochlear implants; Emotion mechanisms; Music-evoked emotions; Music perception; PRELINGUALLY DEAFENED CHILDREN; AESTHETIC ENJOYMENT; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; USERS; EXPERIENCE; APPRAISAL; TIMBRE; CULTURE; SAD;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000001388
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: Music is a multidimensional phenomenon and is classified by its arousal properties, emotional quality, and structural characteristics. Although structural features of music (i.e., pitch, timbre, and tempo) and music emotion recognition in cochlear implant (CI) recipients are popular research topics, music-evoked emotions, and related psychological mechanisms that reflect both the individual and social context of music are largely ignored. Understanding the music-evoked emotions (the "what") and related mechanisms (the "why") can help professionals and CI recipients better comprehend the impact of music on CI recipients' daily lives. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate these aspects in CI recipients and compare their findings to those of normal hearing (NH) controls.Design: This study included 50 CI recipients with diverse auditory experiences who were prelingually deafened (deafened at or before 6 years of age)-early implanted (N = 21), prelingually deafened-late implanted (implanted at or after 12 years of age-N = 13), and postlingually deafened (N = 16) as well as 50 age-matched NH controls. All participants completed the same survey, which included 28 emotions and 10 mechanisms (Brainstem reflex, Rhythmic entrainment, Evaluative Conditioning, Contagion, Visual imagery, Episodic memory, Musical expectancy, Aesthetic judgment, Cognitive appraisal, and Lyrics). Data were presented in detail for CI groups and compared between CI groups and between CI and NH groups.Results: The principal component analysis showed five emotion factors that are explained by 63.4% of the total variance, including anxiety and anger, happiness and pride, sadness and pain, sympathy and tenderness, and serenity and satisfaction in the CI group. Positive emotions such as happiness, tranquility, love, joy, and trust ranked as most often experienced in all groups, whereas negative and complex emotions such as guilt, fear, anger, and anxiety ranked lowest. The CI group ranked lyrics and rhythmic entrainment highest in the emotion mechanism, and there was a statistically significant group difference in the episodic memory mechanism, in which the prelingually deafened, early implanted group scored the lowest.Conclusion: Our findings indicate that music can evoke similar emotions in CI recipients with diverse auditory experiences as it does in NH individuals. However, prelingually deafened and early implanted individuals lack autobiographical memories associated with music, which affects the feelings evoked by music. In addition, the preference for rhythmic entrainment and lyrics as mechanisms of music-elicited emotions suggests that rehabilitation programs should pay particular attention to these cues.
引用
收藏
页码:1451 / 1463
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Speech enhancement for cochlear implant recipients
    Wang, Dongmei
    Hansen, John H. L.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 143 (04): : 2244 - 2254
  • [32] Immunization guidelines for cochlear implant recipients
    Hirsch, Barry E.
    ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2013, 92 (10-11) : 486 - 486
  • [33] Cochlear implant recipients at risk for meningitis
    Wooltorton, E
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2002, 167 (06) : 670 - 670
  • [34] Self-assessment of cochlear health by cochlear implant recipients
    Mushtaq, Faizah
    Soulby, Andrew
    Boyle, Patrick
    Nunn, Terry
    Hartley, Douglas E. H.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [35] Music in noise recognition: An EEG study of listening effort in cochlear implant users and normal hearing controls
    Cartocci, Giulia
    Inguscio, Bianca Maria Serena
    Giorgi, Andrea
    Vozzi, Alessia
    Leone, Carlo Antonio
    Grassia, Rosa
    Di Nardo, Walter
    Di Cesare, Tiziana
    Fetoni, Anna Rita
    Freni, Francesco
    Ciodaro, Francesco
    Galletti, Francesco
    Albera, Roberto
    Canale, Andrea
    Piccioni, Lucia Oriella
    Babiloni, Fabio
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [36] Tonotopic and Default Frequency Fitting for Music Perception in Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Creff, Gwenaelle
    Bernard-Le Liboux, Nicolas
    Coudert, Paul
    Bourdon, Hermine
    Pean, Vincent
    Wallaert, Nicolas
    Lambert, Cassandre
    Godey, Benoit
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 150 (11) : 960 - 968
  • [37] Tonotopic and Default Frequency Fitting for Music Perception in Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Creff, Gwenaelle
    Bernard-Le Liboux, Nicolas
    Coudert, Paul
    Bourdon, Hermine
    Pean, Vincent
    Wallaert, Nicolas
    Lambert, Cassandre
    Godey, Benoit
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 150 (11) : 960 - 968
  • [38] Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients' Perspectives on Experiences With Music in Everyday Life: A Multifaceted and Dynamic Phenomenon
    Gfeller, Kate
    Driscoll, Virginia
    Schwalje, Adam
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [39] ALGORITHMS TO IMPROVE LISTENING IN NOISE FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS
    Hersbach, Adam A.
    Mauger, Stefan J.
    Grayden, David B.
    Fallon, James B.
    McDermott, Hugh J.
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2013, : 428 - 432
  • [40] The usefulness of supportive listening devices for cochlear implant users
    Okazaki, A
    Shintani, T
    Ogata, E
    Himi, T
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS - AN UPDATE, 2002, : 201 - 204