Habitat Impacts on the Golden Eagle's Foraging Ecology and Nest Site Selection in Poland

被引:3
|
作者
Stoj, Marian [1 ]
Kruszyk, Robert [2 ]
Zawadzka, Dorota [3 ,4 ]
Zawadzki, Grzegorz [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Eagle Conservat Comm Podkarpacie Reg, Podzamcze 1a, PL-38200 Jaslo, Poland
[2] Eagle Conservat Comm, Kołobrzeska 50-119, PL-10434 Olsztyn, Poland
[3] Univ Lodz, Dept Forest Sci, UE Branch Tomaszow Mazowiecki, Konstytucji 3,Maja 65-67, PL-97200 Tomaszow Mazowiecki, Poland
[4] Warsaw Univ Life Sci, Inst Forest Sci, Dept Forest Protect, Nowoursynowska 159, PL-02776 Warsaw, Poland
来源
DIVERSITY-BASEL | 2024年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
Aquila chrysaetos; Carpathian Mountains; diet composition; habitat requirements; top predator; AQUILA-CHRYSAETOS; BREEDING SUCCESS; POLISH PART; DIET; POPULATION; BIODIVERSITY; PERFORMANCE; CARPATHIANS; RAPTORS; DENSITY;
D O I
10.3390/d16020123
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos (hereafter GE) is one of Europe's largest avian top predators. The present study recognizes the habitat characteristics and food composition of the GE in Poland. The research was carried out in the Polish part of the Carpathian Mountains. The GEs built nests mainly on old coniferous trees and strongly preferred the Silver Fir Abies alba. On average, within a 5 km buffer around the nest, forests covered about 2/3 of the area, while open land with villages was at 31% and water was about 1%. Birds preferred areas with less forest cover than in the random points, but the nests were significantly further from the countryside than the distance measured for the drawn points distributed in the GEs' range in Poland. Their diet during the breeding season was assessed by analyzing pellets and food remains. The proportion of birds was 55.7%, mammals was 43.4%, and reptiles was 0.9%. The ten most common prey species included the Domestic Pigeon Columba livia, the Ural Owl Strix uralensis, the Tawny Owl Strix aluco, the Buzzard Buteo buteo, the Roe Deer Capreolus capreolus, the Martens Martes sp., and the Red Fox Vulpes vulpes, which composed 70% of food items. Our results showed that the GE is a top predator, as evidenced by the high share of other predators-both mammal and bird species-in its diet, which constituted about 34% of identified preys. The diet of the studied GE population showed geographical variation, suggesting local adaptations to available prey species. The share of Roe Deer increased from west to east, indicating a higher availability in the less urbanized eastern part of the country. An analysis of general food categories showed that, as latitude increased, the share of captured birds among prey of the GEs declined, while the percentage of forest prey increased. Pigeons were prey of the GEs mainly in the western part of their range. The GEs often captured species with nocturnal activity-owls and martens, which were identified in most of the GEs' territories. The proportion of mammals in the diet of the GE increased with an increase in the proportion of open areas, while the abundance of birds of prey and owls in the diet correlated with a higher proportion of forests. The greatest threat to Poland's GE population is the reduction in semi-open areas with low human activity and low human population densities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Modelling golden eagle habitat selection and flight activity in their home ranges for safer wind farm planning
    Tikkanen, Hannu
    Rytkonen, Seppo
    Karlin, Olli-Pekka
    Ollila, Tuomo
    Pakanen, Veli-Matti
    Tuohimaa, Heikki
    Orell, Markku
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2018, 71 : 120 - 131
  • [43] Do bumble bee queens choose nest sites to maximize foraging rate? Testing models of nest site selection
    Suzuki, Yukari
    Kawaguchi, Lina G.
    Munidasa, Dulee T.
    Toquenaga, Yukihiko
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2009, 63 (09) : 1353 - 1362
  • [44] Breeding habitat and nest-site selection by an obligatory "nest-cleptoparasite", the Amur Falcon Falco amurensis
    Frommhold, Martin
    Heim, Arend
    Barabanov, Mikhail
    Maier, Franziska
    Muehle, Ralf-Udo
    Smirenski, Sergei M.
    Heim, Wieland
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (24): : 14430 - 14441
  • [45] Do bumble bee queens choose nest sites to maximize foraging rate? Testing models of nest site selection
    Yukari Suzuki
    Lina G. Kawaguchi
    Dulee T. Munidasa
    Yukihiko Toquenaga
    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2009, 63 : 1353 - 1362
  • [46] The reproductive benefits of livestock farming in barn swallows Hirundo rustica: quality of nest site or foraging habitat?
    Grueebler, Martin U.
    Korner-Nievergelt, Fraenzi
    von Hirschheydt, Johann
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2010, 47 (06) : 1340 - 1347
  • [47] Habitat and nest site selection in the Common Gull Larus canus in southern Poland:: significance of man-made habitats for conservation of an endangered species
    Skorka, Piotr
    Martyka, Rafal
    Wojcik, Joanna D.
    Babiarz, Tomasz
    Skorka, Janusz
    ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA, 2006, 41 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [48] Nest site selection in the urban population of Blackbirds Turdus merula of Szczecin (NW Poland)
    Wysocki, D
    ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA, 2005, 40 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [49] HABITAT USE AND NEST-SITE SELECTION BY RED-SHOULDERED HAWKS IN ARKANSAS
    PRESTON, CR
    HARGER, CS
    HARGER, HE
    SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST, 1989, 34 (01) : 72 - 78
  • [50] Selection of nest-site habitat by interior least terns in relation to sandbar construction
    Sherfy, Mark H.
    Stucker, Jennifer H.
    Buhl, Deborah A.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 76 (02): : 363 - 371