A pragmatic comparison of fetal biometry curves

被引:0
|
作者
Dhombres, Ferdinand [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Massoud, Mona [3 ]
机构
[1] Sorbonne Univ, Hop Trousseau, AP HP, Serv Med Foetale,GRC26, Paris, France
[2] Inserm, LIMICS, Paris, France
[3] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Ctr Hosp Lyon Sud, Serv Obstet & Med Foetale, Hosp Civils Lyon, Lyon, France
[4] Hop Armand Trousseau, Serv Med Foetale, 26 Ave Dr Arnold Netter, F-75020 Paris, France
来源
关键词
Biometry; Ultrasonography; Prenatal; Growth Charts; SHORT FEMUR; GROWTH; CHARTS; ASSOCIATION; ULTRASOUND; SIZE; STANDARDS; FRANCE; LENGTH; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.gofs.2023.09.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction. - The fetal biometrics charts recommended in France for ultrasound screening include measurements of head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BIP), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). New international growth standards have been recommended since 2022. The aim of this work is to quantitatively describe the differences between these biometric curves.Methods. - The biometry curves from the French College for Fetal Ultrasound, OMS and INTERGROWTH21 are pragmatically compared based on their original quantile regression equations (superposition and quantification of differences in millimeters and in proportion) for different percentiles of clinical interest.Results. - Compared with the new charts, CFEF underestimates HC <-3DS and AC < 10eP. The proportions of differences between the CFEF and INTERGROWTH-21 or WHO curves always remained <5%. The proportions of difference of the 3rd percentile of HC and FL, 10th and 90th percentile of AC were always lower than 2%, 2%, 5% and 4% respectively, between OMS and INTERGROWTH-21.Conclusion. - The switch to prescriptive standards suggests an improvement in the detection of fetuses with AC < 10th percentile, an improvement in the detection of prenatal onset microcephaly, with no argument for a decrease in the detection rate of severe constitutional bone disease or modification of obstetrical guidelines.@ 2023 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 530
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] FETAL TWIN ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY
    SCHNEIDER, L
    BESSIS, R
    TABASTE, JL
    SARRAMONT, MF
    JAPHET, N
    ACTA GENETICAE MEDICAE ET GEMELLOLOGIAE, 1979, 28 (04): : 299 - 301
  • [12] ULTRASONIC BIOMETRY OF FETAL GROWTH
    STOGER, H
    KRATOCHWIL, A
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1974, 34 (08) : 611 - 616
  • [13] FETAL OCULAR BIOMETRY BY ULTRASOUND
    JEANTY, P
    DRAMAIXWILMET, M
    VANGANSBEKE, D
    VANREGEMORTER, N
    RODESCH, F
    RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (02) : 513 - 516
  • [14] Chinese fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with charts from other populations
    Zhang, Yixiu
    Meng, Hua
    Jiang, Yuxin
    Xu, Zhonghui
    Ouyang, Yunshu
    Li, Shengli
    Chen, Qian
    Wu, Qingqing
    Li, Rui
    Ru, Tong
    Cai, Aailu
    Chen, Xinlin
    Yang, Taizhu
    Chen, Ping
    Xie, Hongning
    Lu, Hong
    Dai, Qing
    Dong, Fen
    Yang, Meng
    Yang, Xiao
    Lu, Jia
    Tian, Jiawei
    Sun, Kun
    Li, Hui
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (09): : 1507 - 1515
  • [15] Evaluation of fetal kidney length as a marker for fetal biometry
    Choudhary, Archana
    Sibia, Preetkanwal
    Kaur, Sarabhjit
    Gupta, Saryu
    Gambhir, Puneet
    Kaur, Ravinder
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (03) : 1451 - 1459
  • [16] How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age?
    Chervenak, FA
    Skupski, DW
    Romero, R
    Myers, MK
    Smith-Levitin, M
    Rosenwaks, Z
    Thaler, HT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (04) : 678 - 687
  • [17] Transvaginal fetal biometry in early pregnancy
    Rosati, P
    Guariglia, L
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 49 (02) : 91 - 96
  • [18] ULTRASONIC BIOMETRY FOR FETAL WEIGHT DETERMINATION
    MILLER, EC
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR GYNAKOLOGIE, 1980, 102 (05): : 272 - 281
  • [19] Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry
    Perni, SC
    Chervenak, FA
    Kalish, RB
    Magherini-Rothe, S
    Predanic, M
    Streltzoff, J
    Skupski, DW
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 24 (06) : 654 - 658
  • [20] Fetal biometry: Relevance in obstetrical practice
    Zaliunas, Bronius
    Bartkeviciene, Daiva
    Drasutiene, Grazina
    Utkus, Algirdas
    Kurmanavicius, Juozas
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2017, 53 (06): : 357 - 364