Investigating the adoption of energy-saving measures in residential sector: The contribution to carbon neutrality of China and Europe

被引:29
|
作者
Nie, Hongguang [1 ]
Kemp, Rene [2 ,3 ]
Fan, Ying [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Changchun Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Changchun, Peoples R China
[2] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Sustainabil Inst MSI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, UNU MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Beihang Univ, Lab Low carbon Intelligent Governance LLIG, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
Technical energy -saving measure; Behavioral energy -saving measure; Comparative analysis; Carbon neutrality; EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; CONSUMPTION; HOUSEHOLDS; DETERMINANTS; CONSERVATION; ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106791
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China and Europe have both announced plans to be carbon neutral by 2060 and 2050 respectively. In residential sector, energy-saving technologies and behaviours are important measures to achieve carbon neutrality. This study investigated the adoption of technical and behavioural energy-saving measures in Northern China and Western Europe as important paths to achieve carbon neutrality in residential sector. The prevalence of six measures was investigated using a survey, which also enquired about the reasons for the adoption and nonadoption of such measures. The study highlighted remarkable differences in the measures adopted and the reasons for them. People in Northern China were more likely to adopt technical energy-saving measures but less likely to adopt behavioural energy-saving measures than people in Western Europe. Differences in respondents' socio-demographic backgrounds, building details, environmental concerns, or beliefs played a role in the differences observed, but not a great one according to our econometric analysis. Two important reasons for the observed differences were subsidy policies and split incentives due to principal-agent issues between energy companies and energy users. The results showed that the residential sectors in China and Europe are working towards carbon-neutral targets, but in different ways. In Northern China, the direct energy-saving subsidy policy encouraged residents to adopt technical energy-saving measures. In Western Europe, the relatively reasonable energy charging system encouraged people to adopt behavioural energy-saving measures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条