His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy vs Biventricular Pacing HOT-CRT Clinical Trial

被引:20
|
作者
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi [1 ,6 ]
Pokharel, Parash [2 ]
Subzposh, Faiz A. [1 ]
Oren, Jess W. [2 ]
Storm, Randle H. [2 ]
Batul, Syeda A. [3 ]
Beer, Dominik A. [2 ]
Hughes, Grace [4 ]
Leri, Gabriella [4 ]
Manganiello, Marilee [4 ]
Jastremsky, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Mroczka, Kaitlyn [1 ]
Johns, Alicia M. [5 ]
Mascarenhas, Vernon [1 ]
机构
[1] Geisinger Wyoming Valley Med Ctr, Wilkes Barre, PA 18711 USA
[2] Geisinger Med Ctr, Danville, PA USA
[3] Geisinger Community Med Ctr, Scranton, PA USA
[4] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Clin Trials Unit, Wilkes Barre, PA USA
[5] Geisinger Hlth Syst, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Danville, PA USA
[6] Geisinger Wyoming Valley Med Ctr, Geisinger Heart Inst, MC 36-10,1000 East Mt Blvd, Wilkes Barre, PA 18711 USA
关键词
biventricular pacing; cardiac resynchronization therapy; ejection fraction; His bundle pacing; left bundle branch area pacing; LEFT-BUNDLE-BRANCH; VENTRICULAR ELECTRICAL DELAY; HEART-FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacep.2023.08.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND His-Purkinje conduction system pacing (HPCSP) using His bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to compare the feasibility and clinical efficacy of HOT-CRT (His-Purkinje conduction system pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) with BVP in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and indication for CRT.METHODS This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of HOT-CRT and BVP in patients with LVEF <50% and indications for CRT. If HPCSP resulted in incomplete electrical resynchronization, a coronary sinus (CS) lead was added. The primary outcome was the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major complications.RESULTS A total of 100 patients (female 31%, aged 70 +/- 12 years, LVEF 31.5% +/- 9.0%) were randomized. HOT-CRT was successful in 48 of 50 (96%) and BVP-CRT in 41 of 50 (82%) patients (P = 0.03). QRS duration significantly decreased from 164 +/- 26 ms to 137 +/- 20 ms with HOT-CRT and 166 +/- 28 ms to 141 +/- 19 ms with BVP. Fluoroscopy results (18.8 +/- 12.4 min vs 23.8 +/- 12.4 min, P = 0.05) and procedure duration (119 +/- 42 min vs 114 +/- 36 min, P = 0.5) were similar. The primary outcome of change in LVEF at 6 months was greater in HOT-CRT than in BVP (12.4% +/- 7.3% vs 8.0% +/- 10.1%, P = 0.02). The primary safety endpoint was similar (98% vs 94%, P = 0.62). Echocardiographic response of improvement in LVEF >5% occurred in 80% vs 61% (P = 0.06). Complications occurred in 3 (6%) in HOT-CRT vs 10 (20%) in BVP (P = 0.03).CONCLUSIONS HPCSP-guided CRT resulted in greater change in LVEF compared with BVP. Randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are necessary. (His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [HOT-CRT]; NCT04561778) (J Am Coll Cardiol EP 2023;9:2628-2638) (c) 2023 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:2628 / 2638
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Diaz, Juan C.
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    Duque, Mauricio
    Aristizabal, Julian
    Braunstein, Eric D.
    Marin, Jorge
    Nino, Cesar
    Bastidas, Oriana
    Cabanillas, Nestor Lopez
    Koplan, Bruce A.
    Hoyos, Carolina
    Matos, Carlos D.
    Hincapie, Daniela
    Velasco, Alejandro
    Steiger, Nathaniel A.
    Kapur, Sunil
    Tadros, Thomas M.
    Zei, Paul C.
    Sauer, William H.
    Romero, Jorge E.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 10 (02) : 295 - 305
  • [22] Comparison of efficacy and safety of His-Purkinje system pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Chen, Junjun
    Cheng, Liting
    Wang, Zefeng
    Liang, Zhuo
    Dong, Ruiqing
    Hang, Fei
    Chen, Jieruo
    Wang, Xinlu
    Wang, Ziyu
    Du, Xiao
    Zhang, Junmeng
    Wu, Yongquan
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [23] A comparison of cardiac resynchronization by sequential biventricular pacing and left ventricular pacing to simultaneous biventricular pacing: Rationale and design of the DECREASE-HF Clinical Trial
    De Lurgio, DB
    Foster, E
    Higginbotham, MB
    Larntz, K
    Saxon, LA
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2005, 11 (03) : 233 - 239
  • [24] Left Bundle Branch Pacing of His-Purkinje Conduction System: Initial Experience
    Janner Dal Forno, Alexander Romeno
    Ternes, Caique M. P.
    Ternes Rech, Joao Vitor
    Nascimento, Helcio Garcia
    Lewandowski, Andrei
    Damasceno, Grazyelle
    D'Avila, Andre
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2022, 118 (02) : 505 - 515
  • [25] Septal flash correction with His-Purkinje pacing predicts echocardiographic response in resynchronization therapy
    Pujol-Lopez, Margarida
    Jimenez Arjona, Rafael
    Guasch, Eduard
    Doltra, Adelina
    Borras, Roger
    Roca Luque, Ivo
    Castel, Maria angeles
    Garre, Paz
    Ferro, Elisenda
    Niebla, Mireia
    Carro, Esther
    Arbelo, Elena
    Sitges, Marta
    Tolosana, Jose M.
    Mont, Lluis
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (03): : 374 - 383
  • [26] His bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: acute hemodynamic and electrophysiological effects
    Salden, F.
    Luermans, J. G.
    Westra, S. W.
    Cornelussen, R.
    Ghosh, S.
    Prinzen, F. W.
    Vernooy, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 3696 - 3696
  • [27] Comparison of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Optimization Methods with Respect to Biventricular Pacing Percentage: Sub-Analysis of Adaptive CRT Trial
    Lemke, Bernd
    Bimie, David
    Aonuma, Kazutaka
    Houmsse, Mahmoud
    Sambelashvili, Alex
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2012, 18 (08) : S53 - S53
  • [28] Patient Selection for Biventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, His Bundle Pacing, and Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    David J. Sanders
    Kousik Krishnan
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2021, 15
  • [29] Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience
    Sharma, Parikshit S.
    Dandamudi, Gopi
    Herweg, Bengt
    Wilson, David
    Singh, Rajeev
    Naperkowski, Angela
    Koneru, Jayanthi N.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    HEART RHYTHM, 2018, 15 (03) : 413 - 420
  • [30] Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in cardiac resynchronisation therapy: his bundle pacing vs biventricular pacing
    Menezes, Antonio da Silva
    Melo, Maria Gabriella Zordan
    Barreto, Laura Pedriel
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2023, 20 (06) : 505 - 515