Simulated Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

被引:27
|
作者
Rome, Benjamin N. [1 ,2 ]
Nagar, Sarosh [1 ]
Egilman, Alexander C. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Junyi [1 ,2 ]
Feldman, William B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kesselheim, Aaron S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Dept Med, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law PORTAL, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2023年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5218
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 gives Medicare the authority to negotiate prices for certain prescription drugs. Which drugs will be selected and how prices will be negotiated remain unclear. OBJECTIVE To simulate drug selection and the minimum savings that would have been achieved at statutory ceiling prices if Medicare drug price negotiation had been implemented from 2018 to 2020. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this cross-sectional study, a policy simulation analysis of high-spending prescription drugs in Medicare Part B and Part D that were eligible for negotiation from January 2018 to December 2020 was performed from August 5 to November 20, 2022. EXPOSURES Eligibility criteria for selection and discounts afforded by the statutory ceiling prices for negotiation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes were characteristics of drugs subject to negotiation and estimated Medicare savings from 2018 to 2020 that would have been achieved through spending at ceiling prices compared with existing net prices accounting for price concessions. RESULTS Among the 40 selected drugs, 35 were primarily reimbursed through Medicare Part D and 5 through Part B and 10 were biologics. The most common therapeutic classes were endocrine (11), neurologic or psychiatric (5), pulmonary (4), rheumatologic or immunologic (4), and cardiovascular (4). Median time from US Food and Drug Administration approval to selection was 12 years (IQR, 10-14 years). Three drugs faced generic competition in the 2 years between selection and price negotiation. For the remaining 37 drugs, estimated net Medicare spending from 2018 to 2020 was $55.3 billion; spending at ceiling priceswould have been reduced by an estimated $26.5 billion, which represented 5% of estimated net Medicare drug spending during those 3 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cross-sectional study, simulating the drug price negotiation provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 revealed important limitations, including strict selection criteria and the potential for drugs to become ineligible for negotiation during the 2 years between selection and prices taking effect. Despite these limitations, the policy still delivered substantial savings because ceiling prices offered steep discounts, in part, by erasing excess spending from price increases faster than inflation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Power sector impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
    Bistline, John E. T.
    Brown, Maxwell
    Domeshek, Maya
    Marcy, Cara
    Roy, Nicholas
    Blanford, Geoffrey
    Burtraw, Dallas
    Farbes, Jamil
    Fawcett, Allen
    Hamilton, Anne
    Jenkins, Jesse
    Jones, Ryan
    King, Ben
    Kolus, Hannah
    Larsen, John
    Levin, Amanda
    Mahajan, Megan
    Mayfield, Erin
    McFarland, James
    McJeon, Haewon
    Orvis, Robbie
    Patankar, Neha
    Rennert, Kevin
    Robson, Sally
    Roney, Christopher
    Russell, Ethan
    Schivley, Greg
    Shawhan, Daniel
    Steinberg, Daniel
    Victor, Nadejda
    Wenzel, Shelley
    Weyant, John
    Wiser, Ryan
    Yuan, Mei
    Zhao, Alicia
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [22] Inflation Reduction Act and US drug pricing
    Sarpatwari, Ameet
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 378
  • [23] Medicare Drug Price Negotiation in the United States: Implications and Unanswered Questions
    Sullivan, Sean D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (03) : 394 - 399
  • [24] Identifying therapeutic alternatives in Medicare drug price negotiation: The case of etanercept
    Mooney, Helen
    Martin, Matthew
    Bendicksen, Liam
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    Rome, Benjamin N.
    Lalani, Hussain S.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2024, 30 (03): : 226 - 233
  • [25] A TALE OF TWO DRUGS: HOW THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT OF 2022 IMPACTS DRUG CLASSES DIFFERENTLY
    Briggs, S.
    Francois, C.
    Auger, E.
    Busch, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S221 - S221
  • [26] EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATION FRAMEWORK FOR MEDICARE PART B AND D PRODUCTS SUBJECT TO INFLATION REDUCTION ACT (IRA) PRICE REGULATIONS
    Vyas, H.
    Chawla, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S221 - S221
  • [27] INFLATION REDUCTION ACT: HOW WILL THE FIRST 10 DRUGS SELECTED FOR MEDICARE PRICE NEGOTIATIONS IMPACT US COMMERCIAL PAYERS?
    Sidhu, C.
    Connelly, B.
    Waththuhewa, M.
    Sullivan, N.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S197 - S197
  • [28] A summit on amplifying voices of patients, caregivers, and people with disabilities in Inflation Reduction Act drug price negotiations
    Miller, Maxine
    van Geertruyden, Sara
    Saxton, M. Claire
    Savage, Courtney Yohe
    Weir, Debbie
    Werner, Sally
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2024, 30 (03): : 247 - 251
  • [29] Medicare Part D Coverage of Drugs Selected for the Drug Price Negotiation Program
    Patterson, Julie A.
    Wagner, Tyler D.
    O'Brien, John M.
    Campbell, Jonathan D.
    JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2024, 5 (02): : E235237
  • [30] Nonfederal average manufacturer price to estimate savings generated by minimum discounts under the Inflation Reduction Act
    Hernandez, Inmaculada
    Gabriel, Nico
    Dickson, Sean
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2023, 29 (11): : 1261 - 1263