Simulated Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

被引:28
|
作者
Rome, Benjamin N. [1 ,2 ]
Nagar, Sarosh [1 ]
Egilman, Alexander C. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Junyi [1 ,2 ]
Feldman, William B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kesselheim, Aaron S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Dept Med, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law PORTAL, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2023年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5218
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 gives Medicare the authority to negotiate prices for certain prescription drugs. Which drugs will be selected and how prices will be negotiated remain unclear. OBJECTIVE To simulate drug selection and the minimum savings that would have been achieved at statutory ceiling prices if Medicare drug price negotiation had been implemented from 2018 to 2020. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this cross-sectional study, a policy simulation analysis of high-spending prescription drugs in Medicare Part B and Part D that were eligible for negotiation from January 2018 to December 2020 was performed from August 5 to November 20, 2022. EXPOSURES Eligibility criteria for selection and discounts afforded by the statutory ceiling prices for negotiation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes were characteristics of drugs subject to negotiation and estimated Medicare savings from 2018 to 2020 that would have been achieved through spending at ceiling prices compared with existing net prices accounting for price concessions. RESULTS Among the 40 selected drugs, 35 were primarily reimbursed through Medicare Part D and 5 through Part B and 10 were biologics. The most common therapeutic classes were endocrine (11), neurologic or psychiatric (5), pulmonary (4), rheumatologic or immunologic (4), and cardiovascular (4). Median time from US Food and Drug Administration approval to selection was 12 years (IQR, 10-14 years). Three drugs faced generic competition in the 2 years between selection and price negotiation. For the remaining 37 drugs, estimated net Medicare spending from 2018 to 2020 was $55.3 billion; spending at ceiling priceswould have been reduced by an estimated $26.5 billion, which represented 5% of estimated net Medicare drug spending during those 3 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cross-sectional study, simulating the drug price negotiation provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 revealed important limitations, including strict selection criteria and the potential for drugs to become ineligible for negotiation during the 2 years between selection and prices taking effect. Despite these limitations, the policy still delivered substantial savings because ceiling prices offered steep discounts, in part, by erasing excess spending from price increases faster than inflation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Medicare price negotiation and pharmaceutical innovation following the Inflation Reduction Act
    Vogel, Matthew
    Kakani, Pragya
    Chandra, Amitabh
    Conti, Rena M.
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 42 (03) : 406 - 412
  • [2] Medicare price negotiation and pharmaceutical innovation following the Inflation Reduction Act
    Matthew Vogel
    Pragya Kakani
    Amitabh Chandra
    Rena M. Conti
    [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2024, 42 : 406 - 412
  • [3] STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS FOR BIOPHARMACEUTICALS: NAVIGATING THE MEDICARE PRICE NEGOTIATION PROVISIONS OF THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT
    Briggs, S.
    Marder, T.
    Iyer, S.
    Francois, C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S211 - S211
  • [4] Medicare Part B and Part D drug eligibility for center for Medicare and Medicaid Services price negotiation under the Inflation Reduction Act: estimates using 2016-2019 data
    Qureshi, Omar
    Ramachandran, Reshma
    Ross, Joseph S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [5] Using a patient-centered value assessment to optimize fair prices for Inflation Reduction Act's Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program
    Poudel, Nabin
    Ngorsuraches, Surachat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2024, 30 (03): : 241 - 246
  • [6] The Inflation Reduction Act: Recasting the Medicare Prescription Drug Plans
    Adashi, Eli Y.
    O'Mahony, Daniel P.
    Cohen, I. Glenn
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 64 (06) : 936 - 938
  • [7] Section 50 of the Inflation Reduction Act Drug Price Negotiation Program: Considerations for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Manufacturers, and the Health Economics and Outcomes Research Community
    O'Brien, John M.
    Hansen, Jan Elias
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : 1681 - 1685
  • [8] The Constitutionality of Medicare Drug-Price Negotiation under the Takings Clause
    Bhargava, Raj
    Brown, Nathan
    Kapczynski, Amy
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    Lim, Stephanie Y.
    Morten, Christopher J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2023, 51 (04): : 961 - 971
  • [9] TRENDS IN MEDICARE PART D SPENDING ON MIRABEGRON AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT OF 2022
    Berk, Brittany
    Dielubanza, Elodi
    Hwang, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E415 - E415
  • [10] Out-of-Pocket Prescription Drug Savings for Medicare Beneficiaries with Asthma and COPD Under the Inflation Reduction Act
    Mein, Stephen A.
    Tale, Archana
    Rice, Mary B.
    Narasimmaraj, Prihatha R.
    Wadhera, Rishi K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024,