Expanding the targeting scope of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing by Cas9 variants in Brassica

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Wenjing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chunyang [1 ]
Huo, Guanzhong [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xinru [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Jintai [1 ,4 ]
Yu, Xiaoxiao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jing [1 ]
Zhang, Chao [1 ]
Zhao, Jianjun [1 ,3 ]
Li, Yan [1 ,3 ]
Li, Jun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Life Sci, State Key Lab North China Crop Improvement & Regul, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Agr Univ, Hebei Key Lab Plant Physiol & Mol Pathol, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China
[3] Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Hort, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Vegetable Ind Hebei, Key Lab Vegetable Germplasm Innovat & Utilizat Heb, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China
[4] Hebei Agr Univ, Coll Modern Sci & Technol, Baoding 071001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Brassica; Cas9; variants; CRISPR; Genome editing; Non-canonical PAM;
D O I
10.1007/s42994-024-00155-7
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
CRISPR/Cas9, presently the most widely used genome editing technology, has provided great potential for functional studies and plant breeding. However, the strict requirement for a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) has hindered the application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system because the number of targetable genomic sites is limited. Recently, the engineered variants Cas9-NG, SpG, and SpRY, which recognize non-canonical PAMs, have been successfully tested in plants (mainly in rice, a monocot). In this study, we evaluated the targeted mutagenesis capabilities of these Cas9 variants in two important Brassica vegetables, Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa spp. pekinensis) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Both Cas9-NG and SpG induced efficient mutagenesis at NGN PAMs, while SpG outperformed Cas9-NG at NGC and NGT PAMs. SpRY achieved efficient editing at almost all PAMs (NRN > NYN), albeit with some self-targeting activity at transfer (T)-DNA sequences. And SpRY-induced mutants were detected in cabbage plants in a PAM-less fashion. Moreover, an adenine base editor was developed using SpRY and TadA8e deaminase that induced A-to-G conversions within target sites using non-canonical PAMs. Together, the toolboxes developed here induced successful genome editing in Chinese cabbage and cabbage. Our work further expands the targeting scope of genome editing and paves the way for future basic research and genetic improvement in Brassica.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 208
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Advances in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing on vegetable crops
    Shou-Wei Tian
    Si-Nian Xing
    Yong Xu
    [J]. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2021, 57 : 672 - 682
  • [32] Epigenetic Footprints of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Plants
    Lee, Jun Hyung
    Mazarei, Mitra
    Pfotenhauer, Alexander C.
    Dorrough, Aubrey B.
    Poindexter, Magen R.
    Hewezi, Tarek
    Lenaghan, Scott C.
    Graham, David E.
    Stewart, C. Neal, Jr.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2020, 10
  • [33] CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in diploid and tetraploid potatoes
    Aneela Yasmeen
    Allah Bakhsh
    Sara Ajmal
    Momna Muhammad
    Sahar Sadaqat
    Muhammad Awais
    Saira Azam
    Ayesha Latif
    Naila Shahid
    Abdul Qayyum Rao
    [J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2023, 45
  • [34] CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Adenine Base Editing in Rice Genome
    LI Hao
    QIN Ruiying
    LIU Xiaoshuang
    LIAO Shengxiang
    XU Rongfang
    YANG Jianbo
    WEI Pengcheng
    [J]. Rice Science, 2019, 26 (02) : 125 - 128
  • [35] Recent Advances in CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Dictyostelium
    Muramoto, Tetsuya
    Iriki, Hoshie
    Watanabe, Jun
    Kawata, Takefumi
    [J]. CELLS, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [36] Approaches to Enhance Precise CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing
    Denes, Christopher E.
    Cole, Alexander J.
    Aksoy, Yagiz Alp
    Li, Geng
    Neely, Graham Gregory
    Hesselson, Daniel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021, 22 (16)
  • [37] Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Genome Editing in Vitis.
    Sardaru, Papaiah
    Jackson, C.
    Junior, A.
    Khatabi, B.
    Dai, X.
    Zhao, Y.
    Dhekney, S. A.
    [J]. IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-ANIMAL, 2022, 58 (SUPPL 1) : S23 - S23
  • [38] CRISPR–Cas9-mediated genome editing and guide RNA design
    Michael V. Wiles
    Wenning Qin
    Albert W. Cheng
    Haoyi Wang
    [J]. Mammalian Genome, 2015, 26 : 501 - 510
  • [39] Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Rehmannia glutinosa
    Li, Xinrong
    Zuo, Xin
    Li, Mingming
    Yang, Xu
    Zhi, Jingyu
    Sun, Hongzheng
    Xie, Caixia
    Zhang, Zhongyi
    Wang, Fengqing
    [J]. PLANT CELL REPORTS, 2021, 40 (09) : 1695 - 1707
  • [40] CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in diploid and tetraploid potatoes
    Yasmeen, Aneela
    Bakhsh, Allah
    Ajmal, Sara
    Muhammad, Momna
    Sadaqat, Sahar
    Awais, Muhammad
    Azam, Saira
    Latif, Ayesha
    Shahid, Naila
    Rao, Abdul Qayyum
    [J]. ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2023, 45 (02)