Algorithmic decision-making in social work practice and pedagogy: confronting the competency/critique dilemma

被引:1
|
作者
James, Paul [1 ]
Lal, Jason [1 ]
Liao, Ashley [1 ]
Magee, Liam [1 ]
Soldatic, Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Sydney, Inst Culture & Soc, Sydney, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Social work; pedagogy; algorithmic decision-making; agency; curriculum; relational engagement; competency; critique; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1080/02615479.2023.2195425
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The world is experiencing an accelerating digital transformation. One aspect of this is the implementation of algorithmic decision-making, often supported by Artificial Intelligence. Algorithmic systems have the potential to change the meaning of critical elements of the engagement between social workers and people who need support. At the same time, social workers are increasingly being required by their agencies to integrate such abstracting technologies and techniques evermore comprehensively into their professional practice. This integration also creates tensions for training future social workers. It requires on the one hand directly responding to an old but intensifying tension between training students technically, and, on the other, providing the pedagogical tools for finding some critical distance from those same technologies and techniques. The article works through this tension of technique/critique, and a second associated tension between deploying technologies of mediated engagement and being present 'in the room' (presence/mediation). The consequences of how both tensions are handled, we suggest, are being intensified through the technologization of service-delivery. The article suggests ways of approaching a technical-critical pedagogy that responds to this complexity by being practice-embedded and theoretically engaged.
引用
收藏
页码:1552 / 1569
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Principal Fairness for Human and Algorithmic Decision-Making
    Imai, Kosuke
    Jiang, Zhichao
    STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (02) : 317 - 328
  • [42] Algorithmic Driven Decision-Making Systems in Education
    Ferrero, Federico
    Gewerc, Adriana
    2019 XIV LATIN AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (LACLO 2019), 2020, : 166 - 173
  • [43] The value of responsibility gaps in algorithmic decision-making
    Munch, Lauritz
    Mainz, Jakob
    Bjerring, Jens Christian
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 25 (01)
  • [44] Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making
    Kasy, Maximilian
    Abebe, Rediet
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2021, 2021, : 576 - 586
  • [45] Pushing the Limits of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making
    Shah, Nisarg
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SECOND INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2023, 2023, : 7051 - 7056
  • [46] A RIGHT TO AN EXPLANATION OF ALGORITHMIC DECISION-MAKING IN CHINA
    Lin, Huanmin
    Wu, Hong
    HONG KONG LAW JOURNAL, 2022, 52 : 1163 - +
  • [47] ALGORITHMIC STRUCTURING OF DIALOG DECISION-MAKING SYSTEMS
    ARAKSYAN, VV
    ENGINEERING CYBERNETICS, 1984, 22 (04): : 120 - 124
  • [48] The value of responsibility gaps in algorithmic decision-making
    Lauritz Munch
    Jakob Mainz
    Jens Christian Bjerring
    Ethics and Information Technology, 2023, 25
  • [49] Contrastive Counterfactual Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making
    Mutlu, Ece Cigdem
    Yousefi, Niloofar
    Garibay, Ozlem Ozmen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, AIES 2022, 2022, : 499 - 507
  • [50] On the Impact of Explanations on Understanding of Algorithmic Decision-Making
    Schmude, Timothee
    Koesten, Laura
    Moeller, Torsten
    Tschiatschek, Sebastian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2023, 2023, : 959 - 970