Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density

被引:5
|
作者
Kerlikowske, Karla [1 ,2 ,3 ,14 ]
Zhu, Weiwei [4 ]
Su, Yu-Ru [4 ]
Sprague, Brian L. [5 ,6 ]
Stout, Natasha K. [7 ,8 ]
Onega, Tracy [9 ]
O'Meara, Ellen S. [4 ]
Henderson, Louise M. [10 ]
Tosteson, Anna N. A. [11 ,12 ]
Wernli, Karen [4 ]
Miglioretti, Diana L. [4 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med & Epidemiol, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Vet Affairs, Gen Internal Med Sect, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Washington, Kaiser Permanente Washington Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Univ Vermont, Dept Surg, Burlington, VT USA
[6] Univ Vermont, Dept Radiol, Burlington, VT USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Boston, MA USA
[9] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[10] Univ N Carolina, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[11] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Lebanon, NH USA
[12] Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dartmouth Canc Ctr, Lebanon, NH USA
[13] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Davis, CA USA
[14] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, Gen Internal Med Sect, 111A1, 4150 Clement St, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
来源
关键词
CANCER-DETECTION; INTERVAL CANCER; AVERAGE RISK; BINARY DATA; WOMEN; MRI; TOMOSYNTHESIS; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djad201
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Examining screening outcomes by breast density for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with or without mammography could inform discussions about supplemental MRI in women with dense breasts.Methods We evaluated 52 237 women aged 40-79 years who underwent 2611 screening MRIs alone and 6518 supplemental MRI plus mammography pairs propensity score-matched to 65 810 screening mammograms. Rates per 1000 examinations of interval, advanced, and screen-detected early stage invasive cancers and false-positive recall and biopsy recommendation were estimated by breast density (nondense = almost entirely fatty or scattered fibroglandular densities; dense = heterogeneously/extremely dense) adjusting for registry, examination year, age, race and ethnicity, family history of breast cancer, and prior breast biopsy.Results Screen-detected early stage cancer rates were statistically higher for MRI plus mammography vs mammography for nondense (9.3 vs 2.9; difference = 6.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5 to 10.3) and dense (7.5 vs 3.5; difference = 4.0, 95% CI = 1.4 to 6.7) breasts and for MRI vs MRI plus mammography for dense breasts (19.2 vs 7.5; difference = 11.7, 95% CI = 4.6 to 18.8). Interval rates were not statistically different for MRI plus mammography vs mammography for nondense (0.8 vs 0.5; difference = 0.4, 95% CI = -0.8 to 1.6) or dense breasts (1.5 vs 1.4; difference = 0.0, 95% CI = -1.2 to 1.3), nor were advanced cancer rates. Interval rates were not statistically different for MRI vs MRI plus mammography for nondense (2.6 vs 0.8; difference = 1.8 (95% CI = -2.0 to 5.5) or dense breasts (0.6 vs 1.5; difference = -0.9, 95% CI = -2.5 to 0.7), nor were advanced cancer rates. False-positive recall and biopsy recommendation rates were statistically higher for MRI groups than mammography alone.Conclusion MRI screening with or without mammography increased rates of screen-detected early stage cancer and false-positives for women with dense breasts without a concomitant decrease in advanced or interval cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 257
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography
    B. L. Stehouwer
    L. G. Merckel
    H. M. Verkooijen
    N. H. G. M. Peters
    R. M. Mann
    K. M. Duvivier
    W. P. Th. M. Mali
    P. H. M. Peeters
    W. B. Veldhuis
    M. A. A. J. van den Bosch
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 603 - 609
  • [42] Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and mammography for breast cancer
    Zhang, Yueqiao
    Ren, Hong
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 13 (05) : 862 - 868
  • [43] Dedicated double breast coil for magnetic resonance mammography imaging, biopsy, and preoperative localization
    Pfleiderer, SOR
    Reichenbach, JR
    Azhari, T
    Marx, C
    Wurdinger, S
    Kaiser, WA
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [44] 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography
    Stehouwer, B. L.
    Merckel, L. G.
    Verkooijen, H. M.
    Peters, N. H. G. M.
    Mann, R. M.
    Duvivier, K. M.
    Mali, W. P. Th M.
    Peeters, P. H. M.
    Veldhuis, W. B.
    van den Bosch, M. A. A. J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (03) : 603 - 609
  • [45] Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging
    Kathy Schilling
    Deepa Narayanan
    Judith E. Kalinyak
    Juliette The
    Maria Victoria Velasquez
    Simone Kahn
    Matthew Saady
    Ravinder Mahal
    Larraine Chrystal
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2011, 38 : 23 - 36
  • [46] Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging
    Schilling, Kathy
    Narayanan, Deepa
    Kalinyak, Judith E.
    The, Juliette
    Velasquez, Maria Victoria
    Kahn, Simone
    Saady, Matthew
    Mahal, Ravinder
    Chrystal, Larraine
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 (01) : 23 - 36
  • [47] Diagnostic performance of mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating mammographically visible breast masses
    Zhu, Xueli
    Cao, Yi
    Li, Ruidie
    Zhu, Mingxia
    Chen, Xin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (09)
  • [48] Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: A comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography
    Hata, T
    Takahashi, H
    Watanabe, K
    Takashi, M
    Taguchi, K
    Itoh, T
    Todo, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 198 (02) : 190 - 197
  • [49] Re: Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer - Response
    Stoutjesdijk, MJ
    Boetes, C
    Barentsz, JO
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (22) : 1755 - 1755
  • [50] Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography
    Malur, S
    Wurdinger, S
    Moritz, A
    Michels, W
    Schneider, A
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2001, 3 (01) : 55 - 60