Association of Head and Neck Anatomic Zones with Microvascular Reconstruction Outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
De Ravin, Emma [1 ,2 ]
Barrette, Louis-Xavier [2 ]
Carey, Ryan M. M. [1 ]
Slijepcevic, Allison [3 ]
Petrisor, Daniel [3 ,4 ]
Taghizadeh, Farshid [3 ]
Elliott, Zachary [5 ]
Rajasekaran, Karthik [1 ]
Chalian, Ara C. C. [1 ]
Brody, Robert M. M. [1 ]
Newman, Jason G. G. [1 ]
Shanti, Rabie M. M. [1 ,6 ]
Curry, Joseph [5 ]
Wax, Mark K. K. [3 ]
Cannady, Steven B. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 800 Walnut St,18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Portland, OR USA
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Portland, OR USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Univ Penn, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Pharmacol, Sch Dent Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
SKELETAL-MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; FREE-FLAP RECONSTRUCTION; BLOOD-FLOW; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1089/fpsam.2022.0103
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Head and neck free flap survival relies on adequate tissue perfusion from the external carotid artery (ECA), and vessel length is inversely proportional to blood flow rate.Objective: Investigate whether distance from the ECA (as a proxy for pedicle vessel length) predicts flap survival or complications.Methods: Retrospective review of free flaps performed at three academic centers from 9/2006 to 8/2021. Flaps were categorized by distance from the ECA: orbit and above (zone 1), maxilla to parotid (zone 2), and mandible and below (zone 3). Secondary analysis assessed flap outcomes stratified by average historical pedicle length.Results: A total of 2,369 flaps were identified in zones 1 (n = 109), 2 (n = 1878), and 3 (n = 382). Rates of flap failure (4.9%) and perioperative complications (36.3%) did not differ by zone or pedicle length. Zone 3 flaps, most commonly located in the larynx and hypopharynx, had significantly higher rates of fistula and infection. Conversely, 30-day readmission rates were significantly lower in patients with zone 2 flaps (p < 0.001). Rates of all other complications did not differ significantly between zones.Conclusions: Proximity to mucosal anatomic sites was a more powerful predictor of free flap viability than pedicle length or ECA proximity.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 205
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Microvascular Soft Tissue Reconstruction Outcomes and Risk Factors in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Reconstruction
    James, Justin
    Seyidova, Nargiz
    Takyi, Evans
    Oleru, Olachi
    Taub, Peter J.
    FACE, 2024, 5 (01): : 26 - 33
  • [22] Hyperglycemia and risk of adverse outcomes following microvascular reconstruction of oncologic head and neck defects
    Offodile, Anaeze C., II
    Chou, Hsuan-Yu
    Lin, Jennifer An-Jou
    Loh, Charles Yuen Yung
    Chang, Kai-Ping
    Aycart, Mario A.
    Kao, Huang-Kai
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 79 : 15 - 19
  • [23] Impact of Body Mass Index on Surgical Outcomes in Oncologic Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Asaad, Malke
    Yao, Christopher
    Kambhampati, Praneeth
    Mitchell, David
    Liu, Jun
    Lewis, Carol M.
    Yu, Peirong
    Hanasono, Matthew M.
    Chang, Edward, I
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (08) : 5109 - 5121
  • [24] Microvascular reconstruction for head and neck cancers in high risk population: clinical outcomes and complications
    Katna, R.
    Singh, S.
    Bhosale, B.
    Deshpande, A.
    Kalyani, N.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2021, 103 (04) : 278 - 281
  • [25] Mild hypothermia is associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing microvascular head and neck reconstruction
    Laitman, Benjamin M.
    Ma, Yue
    Hill, Bryan
    Teng, Marita
    Genden, Eric
    DeMaria, Samuel
    Miles, Brett A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 40 (03) : 418 - 422
  • [26] Impact of Body Mass Index on Surgical Outcomes in Oncologic Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Malke Asaad
    Christopher Yao
    Praneeth Kambhampati
    David Mitchell
    Jun Liu
    Carol M Lewis
    Peirong Yu
    Matthew M. Hanasono
    Edward I. Chang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 5109 - 5121
  • [27] Assessment of the NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Predicting Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction Outcomes
    Ma, Yue
    Laitman, Benjamin M.
    Patel, Vir
    Teng, Marita
    Genden, Eric
    DeMaria, Samuel, Jr.
    Miles, Brett A.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2019, 160 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [28] Swallowing outcomes after microvascular head and neck reconstruction: A prospective review of 191 cases
    Khariwala, Samir S.
    Vivek, Prashant P.
    Lorenz, Robert R.
    Esclamado, Ramon M.
    Wood, Benjamin
    Strome, Marshall
    Alam, Daniel S.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2007, 117 (08): : 1359 - 1363
  • [29] Microvascular Reconstruction for Tumors of the Head and Neck in the Pediatric Population
    Balasubramanian, Deepak
    Subramaniam, Narayana
    Ramu, Janarthanan
    Sood, Ridhi
    Sharma, Mohit
    Mathew, Jimmy
    Thankappan, Krishnakumar
    Subhash, Pramod
    Krishnadas, Arjun
    Iyer, Subramania
    JOURNAL OF HEAD & NECK PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, 2020, 8 (01): : 12 - 16
  • [30] Microvascular Anastomotic Coupler Assessment in Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Frederick, John W.
    Sweeny, Larissa
    Carroll, William R.
    Rosenthal, Eben L.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2013, 149 (01) : 67 - 70