Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of Kriya River Basin in Xinjiang and Its Multi-Scenario Simulation Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Jinbao [1 ,2 ]
He, Xuemin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Pengcheng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zizheng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ranran [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Ecol & Environm, Urumqi 830017, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Univ, Key Lab Oasis Ecol, Educ Minist, Urumqi 830017, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Educ, Xinjiang Jinghe Observat & Res Stn Temperate Deser, Jinghe 833300, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Landscape Ecological Risk (LER); Kriya River Basin (KRB); PLUS model; multi-scenario simulation; driving factors; ROAD NETWORK; IMPACTS; CHINA; MODEL; MANAGEMENT; REGION; OASIS;
D O I
10.3390/w15244256
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To comprehend the potential impacts of both natural phenomena and human activities on ecological risk, a thorough examination of the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of Landscape Ecological Risk (LER) in arid river basins is imperative. This investigation holds paramount importance for the proactive prevention and mitigation of LER, as well as for the preservation of ecological security within these basins. In this scholarly inquiry, the Kriya River Basin (KRB) serves as the focal point of analysis. Leveraging three historical land use and land cover (LULC) images and incorporating a diverse array of drivers, encompassing both natural and anthropogenic factors, the study employs the PLUS model to forecast the characteristics of LULC changes within the basin under three distinct scenarios projected for the year 2030. Concurrently, the research quantitatively assesses the ecological risks of the basin through the adoption of the Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment (LERA) methodology and the Spatial Character Analysis (SCA) methodology. The results showed the following: (1) The study area is primarily composed of grassland and unused land, which collectively account for over 97% of the total land. However, there has been a noticeable rise in cropland and considerable deterioration in grassland between 2000 and 2020. The key observed change in LULC involves the transformation of grassland and unused land into cropland, forest, and construction land. (2) The overall LER indices for 2000, 2010, and 2020 are 0.1721, 0.1714, and 0.16696, respectively, showing strong positive spatial correlations and increasing autocorrelations over time. (3) Over time, human activities have come to exert a greater influence on LER compared to natural factors between 2000 and 2020. (4) In the natural development scenario (NDS), cropland protection scenario (CPS), and ecological priority scenario (EPS), the LER of KRB experienced notable variations in the diverse 2030 scenarios. Notably, the CPS exhibited the highest proportion of low-risk areas, whereas Daryaboyi emerged as the focal point of maximum vulnerability. These findings offer theoretical and scientific support for sustainable development planning in the watershed.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-Scenario Landscape Ecological Risk Simulation for Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study on the Central Mountainous Area of Hainan Island
    Han, Nianlong
    Yu, Miao
    Jia, Peihong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (07)
  • [32] Multi-scenario simulation and ecological risk analysis of land use based on the PLUS model: A case study of Nanjing
    Gao, Lina
    Tao, Fei
    Liu, Runrui
    Wang, Zilong
    Leng, Hongjun
    Zhou, Tong
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 85
  • [33] Multi-scenario simulation of ecological risk assessment based on ecosystem service values in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
    Liu, Ruimin
    Li, Lin
    Guo, Lijia
    Jiao, Lijun
    Wang, Yifan
    Cao, Leiping
    Wang, Yue
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (06)
  • [34] Multi-scenario simulation of ecological risk assessment based on ecosystem service values in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
    Ruimin Liu
    Lin Li
    Lijia Guo
    Lijun Jiao
    Yifan Wang
    Leiping Cao
    Yue Wang
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194
  • [35] Landscape pattern optimization in Ningjiang River Basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment
    Li Q.
    Zhang Z.
    Wan L.
    Yang C.
    Zhang J.
    Ye C.
    Chen Y.
    Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74 (07): : 1420 - 1437
  • [36] PLUS-Model Based Multi-Scenario Land Space Simulation of the Lower Yellow River Region and Its Ecological Effects
    Lu, Chang
    Qi, Xiao
    Zheng, Zhongsen
    Jia, Kun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [37] Ecological Risk Assessment of Land Use Change in the Tarim River Basin, Xinjiang, China
    Cheng, Yaqi
    Zhang, Xuyang
    Song, Wei
    LAND, 2024, 13 (04)
  • [38] Habitat Quality Evolution and Multi-Scenario Simulation Based on Land Use Change in the Jialing River Basin
    Duan, Xiong
    Chen, Bin
    Zhang, Tianxiang
    Guan, Yuqi
    Zeng, Kun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (16)
  • [39] Analysis of carbon emission drivers and multi-scenario projection of carbon peaks in the Yellow River Basin
    Liangmin Wang
    Weixian Xue
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [40] Multi-Scenario Simulation of the Production-Living-Ecological Spaces in Sichuan Province Based on the PLUS Model and Assessment of Its Ecological and Environmental Effects
    Fu, Yu
    Li, Qian
    Li, Julin
    Zeng, Kun
    Wang, Liangsong
    Wang, Youhan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (23)