Using a Multi-Criteria Ranking Method to Assess Factors Influencing the Implementation of Sustainable Development at Higher Educational Institutions

被引:2
|
作者
Mrzyglocka-Chojnacka, Jagoda [1 ]
Rynca, Radoslaw [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Management, Wyb Wyspianskiego 27, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
implementation of sustainable development; sustainable development management; higher educational institutions; university sustainable development; multicriteria ranking method; ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; UNIVERSITY; INDICATORS; DIMENSIONS; LEADERS; CHINA; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su15076256
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over the last years, there has been a significant increase in interest in sustainable development in higher education institutions, and many have begun to implement sustainable development into their system. Several sustainable development assessment tools have also been developed to help universities systematically measure, monitor, benchmark, communicate, and manage their sustainable development efforts. These efforts have led to mixed results. It seems that one of the main reasons for this situation is the non-systematic and non-holistic approach to implementing sustainable development in universities. Thus, it can be assumed that the implementation of sustainable development in a university should cover all dimensions of its functioning and involve actors within it. Therefore, the aim of this article is to present a tool (inspired by the concept of university sustainability), based on the method of multicriteria rankings, for assessing the factors influencing the implementation of sustainable development in higher education institutions at the level of departments, as relatively autonomous wholes, based on the analysis of departments at one of the leading technical universities in Poland. The proposed tool provides an opportunity for a more holistic view of sustainable development implementation, both by prioritizing factors and by considering that higher education institutions are systems that are, in fact, composed of two distinct but necessarily cooperating subsystems: the academic subsystem and the administrative subsystem. The proposal is preliminary, but it seems that given the relevance and urgency of the sustainable development issue, this is the direction to take in research on sustainable development management in higher education institutions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The multi-criteria analysis for sustainable urban growth by using Fuzzy Method: case study Trikomo, Cyprus
    Kara, Can
    Akcit, Nuhcan
    AIMS GEOSCIENCES, 2021, 7 (04): : 623 - 636
  • [32] Performance of Sustainable Alternatives Using an Integrated Multi-Criteria Method: Evidence from Brazilian Food Sector
    da Silva, Deoclecio Junior Cardoso
    de Castro, Beatriz Leite Gustmann
    da Veiga, Claudimar Pereira
    Campos, Lucila Maria de Souza
    Stertz, Estefana da Silva
    Nunes, Andrieli de Fatima Paz
    Pozzer, Ranice Hoeehr Pedrazzi
    Lopes, Luis Felipe Dias
    PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 8 (01) : 3 - 19
  • [33] Using single impact metrics to assess research in business and economics: why institutions should use multi-criteria systems for assessing research
    Olavarrieta, Sergio
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE, 2022, 27 (53): : 6 - 33
  • [34] Quantitative method to assess the number of jobs created by production systems: Application to multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable biomass supply chain
    Chazara, Philippe
    Negny, Stephane
    Montastruc, Ludouic
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2017, 12 : 134 - 154
  • [35] Evaluating Critical Influencing Factors of Desalination by Membrane Distillation Process-Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Anqi, Ali E.
    Mohammed, Azam A.
    MEMBRANES, 2021, 11 (03) : 1 - 22
  • [36] Supply chain strategy decisions for sustainable development using an integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Sreekumar, V.
    Rajmohan, M.
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 27 (01) : 50 - 60
  • [37] Does the Gold Standard label hold its promise in delivering higher Sustainable Development benefits? A multi-criteria comparison of CDM projects
    Drupp, Moritz A.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (03) : 1213 - 1227
  • [38] Prioritizing Strategies for Sustainable End-of-Life Vehicle Management Using Combinatorial Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method
    Shameem Ahmed
    Shamsuddin Ahmed
    Md. Rezaul Hasan Shumon
    M. Abdul Quader
    Haeng Muk Cho
    Md. Iqbal Mahmud
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2016, 18 : 448 - 462
  • [39] Comparative Analysis of Residents' Attitudes Toward Sustainable Tourism Development Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique
    Selcuk, Onur
    Karakas, Hatice
    Cizel, Beykan
    Ciftci, Sukru Firat
    Oksuz, Fulya Coskun
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2021, 14 (03) : 585 - 607
  • [40] Prioritizing Strategies for Sustainable End-of-Life Vehicle Management Using Combinatorial Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method
    Ahmed, Shameem
    Ahmed, Shamsuddin
    Shumon, Md. Rezaul Hasan
    Quader, M. Abdul
    Cho, Haeng Muk
    Mahmud, Md. Iqbal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 18 (03) : 448 - 462