Unipolar Latissimus Dorsi Transfer for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Residual Post-traumatic Brachial Plexus Palsy Associated with Distal Humeral Fractures

被引:2
|
作者
Sadek, Ahmed Fathy [1 ]
Ellabban, Mohamed A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Minia Univ, Fac Med, Orthopaed Surg Dept, Hand & Microsurg Unit, Al Minya, Egypt
[2] Suez Canal Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Plast & Reconstruct Surg Unit, Ismailia, Egypt
关键词
latissimus dorsi; restoration of elbow flexion; residual brachial plexus palsy; distal humeral fracture; MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; RECONSTRUCTION; NERVE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1739962
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Elbow flexion is indispensable for both functioning and nonfunctioning hands. It is well perceived that restoration of elbow function is the first reconstructive priority in cases of brachial plexus injuries. The authors assessed the impact of associated distal humeral fractures on the functional outcome after unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer (ULDT) for restoration of elbow flexion in patients with residual brachial plexus palsy (BPP). Patients and Methods Twenty-three patients operated for restoring elbow flexion after residual post-traumatic BPP (with or without distal humeral fracture) by unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer (ULDT) were reviewed for a retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups; associated distal humeral fracture group (HF-group; 10 patients) and non-associated distal humeral fracture group (NHF-group; 13 patients). Elbow flexion active range of motion (AROM), flexion deformity in addition to Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were assessed. Results In both groups there were statistically better postoperative MEPS grading (p = 0.007, p = 0.001, respectively) and scoring with a mean of 81 +/- 16.1 and 90 +/- 4.6, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean postoperative elbow flexion AROM was statistically better in both groups. The mean supination AROM was better in NHF group (p = 0.057). Conclusion The use of ULDT in residual post-traumatic BPP is an efficient procedure in regaining functional flexion and supination. An associated distal humeral fracture does not significantly affect the final functional outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 211
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Distal nerve transfer versus supraclavicular nerve grafting: comparison of elbow flexion outcome in neonatal brachial plexus palsy with C5-C7 involvement
    Carlos O. Heise
    Mario G. Siqueira
    Roberto S. Martins
    Luciano H. Foroni
    Hugo Sterman-Neto
    Child's Nervous System, 2017, 33 : 1571 - 1574
  • [22] Correlation between modified trochleocapitellar index and post-traumatic elbow stiffness in type C2-3 distal humeral fractures among adults
    Hua, Kehan
    Ji, Shangwei
    Li, Ting
    Chen, Chen
    Zha, Yejun
    Gong, Maoqi
    Sun, Weitong
    Lu, Shuai
    Jiang, Xieyuan
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (09) : 1876 - 1883
  • [23] Is one nerve transfer enough? A systematic review and pooled analysis comparing ulnar fascicular nerve transfer and double ulnar and median fascicular nerve transfer for restoration of elbow flexion after traumatic brachial plexus injury
    Donnelly, Megan R.
    Rezzadeh, Kevin T.
    Vieira, Dorice
    Daar, David
    Hacquebord, Jacques
    MICROSURGERY, 2020, 40 (03) : 361 - 369
  • [24] Recovery of elbow flexion in post-traumatic C5-C6 and C5-C6-C7 palsy: Retrospective dual-center study comparing single to double nerve transfer
    Barthel, P. -Y.
    Barbary, S.
    Breton, A.
    Apredoaei, C.
    Dap, F.
    Mansat, P.
    Dautel, G.
    CHIRURGIE DE LA MAIN, 2014, 33 (03) : 211 - 218