Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice

被引:13
|
作者
White, Nicole M. [1 ,2 ]
Carter, Hannah E. [1 ,2 ]
Kularatna, Sanjeewa [1 ,2 ]
Borg, David N. [1 ,2 ]
Brain, David C. [1 ,2 ]
Tariq, Amina [1 ,2 ]
Abell, Bridget [1 ,2 ]
Blythe, Robin [1 ,2 ]
McPhail, Steven M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Work, Australian Ctr Hlth Serv Innovat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Publ Hlth & Social Work, Ctr Healthcare Transformat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Metro South Hlth, Digital Hlth & Informat Directorate, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Australian Ctr Hlth Serv Innovat, 60 Musk Ave, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[5] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Ctr Hlth care Transformat, 60 Musk Ave, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
clinical decision support system; electronic medical records; health economics; hospital-based care; PROVIDER ORDER ENTRY; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; IMPLEMENTATION; IMPACT; STEWARDSHIP; MEDICATION; OUTCOMES; CARE; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocad040
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective Sustainable investment in computerized decision support systems (CDSS) requires robust evaluation of their economic impacts compared with current clinical workflows. We reviewed current approaches used to evaluate the costs and consequences of CDSS in hospital settings and presented recommendations to improve the generalizability of future evaluations. Materials and Methods A scoping review of peer-reviewed research articles published since 2010. Searches were completed in the PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases (last searched February 14, 2023). All studies reported the costs and consequences of a CDSS-based intervention compared with current hospital workflows. Findings were summarized using narrative synthesis. Individual studies were further appraised against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation and Reporting (CHEERS) 2022 checklist. Results Twenty-nine studies published since 2010 were included. Studies evaluated CDSS for adverse event surveillance (5 studies), antimicrobial stewardship (4 studies), blood product management (8 studies), laboratory testing (7 studies), and medication safety (5 studies). All studies evaluated costs from a hospital perspective but varied based on the valuation of resources affected by CDSS implementation, and the measurement of consequences. We recommend future studies follow guidance from the CHEERS checklist; use study designs that adjust for confounders; consider both the costs of CDSS implementation and adherence; evaluate consequences that are directly or indirectly affected by CDSS-initiated behavior change; examine the impacts of uncertainty and differences in outcomes across patient subgroups. Discussion and Conclusion Improving consistency in the conduct and reporting of evaluations will enable detailed comparisons between promising initiatives, and their subsequent uptake by decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1218
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Review of computerized clinical decision support in community pharmacy
    不详
    PHARMACEUTICAL CARE ESPANA, 2015, 17 (02): : 357 - 357
  • [32] Future of clinical decision support in computerized prescriber order entry
    Chaffee, Bruce W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2010, 67 (11) : 932 - 935
  • [33] Computerized clinical decision support systems for prescribing in primary care: Characteristics and implementation impact. Scoping review and evidence and gap maps
    Acosta-Garcia, Hector
    Ruano-Ruiz, Juan
    Gomez-Garcia, Francisco Jose
    Sanchez-Fidalgo, Susana
    Santos-Ramos, Bernardo
    Molina-Lopez, Teresa
    HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 14 (02)
  • [34] Decision Support Systems for Tuberculosis: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Lima, Vinicius
    Bernardi, Filipe
    Pellison, Felipe
    Rijo, Rui
    Kritski, Afranio
    Galliez, Rafael
    Alves, Domingos
    HEALTH INFORMATICS VISION: FROM DATA VIA INFORMATION TO KNOWLEDGE, 2019, 262 : 101 - 104
  • [35] Do providers use computerized clinical decision support systems? A systematic review and meta-regression of clinical decision support uptake
    Andrew Kouri
    Janet Yamada
    Jeffrey Lam Shin Cheung
    Stijn Van de Velde
    Samir Gupta
    Implementation Science, 17
  • [36] Do providers use computerized clinical decision support systems? A systematic review and meta-regression of clinical decision support uptake
    Kouri, Andrew
    Yamada, Janet
    Cheung, Jeffrey Lam Shin
    Van de Velde, Stijn
    Gupta, Samir
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [37] The use of computerized clinical decision support systems in emergency care: a substantive review of the literature
    Bennett, Paula
    Hardiker, Nicholas R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (03) : 655 - 668
  • [38] The Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Laboratory Test Ordering Systematic Review
    Delvaux, Nicolas
    Van Thienen, Katrien
    Heselmans, Annemie
    Van de Velde, Stijn
    Ramaekers, Dirk
    Aertgeerts, Bert
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 141 (04) : 585 - 595
  • [39] Nutrition support in clinical practice: Review of published data and recommendations for future research directions
    Klein, S
    Kinney, J
    Jeejeebhoy, K
    Alpers, D
    Hellerstein, M
    Murray, M
    Twomey, P
    Bistrian, B
    Bothe, A
    Heitkemper, M
    Hubbard, V
    Schnackenberg, D
    Bernstein, E
    Hambidge, M
    Heymsfield, S
    IretonJones, C
    Wolfson, M
    Jacobs, D
    Keithley, J
    Meguid, M
    Pingleton, S
    Kopple, J
    Koretz, R
    Shulman, R
    Wilmore, D
    Driscoll, D
    Fleming, CR
    Greene, H
    Sitrin, M
    Herrmann, V
    Lipman, T
    Mock, D
    Borum, P
    Shronts, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1997, 66 (03): : 683 - 706
  • [40] Nutrition support in clinical practice: Review of published data and recommendations for future research directions
    Klein, S
    Kinney, J
    Jeejeebhoy, K
    Alpers, D
    Hellerstein, M
    Murray, M
    Twomey, P
    Bistrian, B
    Bothe, A
    Heitkemper, M
    Hubbard, V
    Schnackenberg, D
    Bernstein, E
    Hambidge, M
    Heymsfield, S
    IretonJones, C
    Wolfson, M
    Jacobs, D
    Keithley, J
    Meguid, M
    Pingleton, S
    Kopple, J
    Koretz, R
    Shulman, R
    Wilmore, D
    Driscoll, D
    Fleming, CR
    Greene, H
    Sitrin, M
    Herrmann, V
    Lipman, T
    Mock, D
    Borum, P
    Shronts, E
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1997, 21 (03) : 133 - 156